On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Michael Kuhn <mik@adminkuhn.ch> wrote:

Dewey Decimal Classification uses characters that indeed do look like Arabic numbers (standing for classes, divisions, sections), but these characters do not behave like numbers, so the correct sorting is actually not as you would expect (namely seen from the right to left)

  1
  2
 11
 21
100
230

but (and thus seen from left to right)

1
100
11
2
21
230

Hope this helps.

That's' not the way I understand it. The Dewey classes:

000 – Computer science, information & general works
100 – Philosophy and psychology
200 – Religion
300 – Social sciences
400 – Language
500 – Pure Science
600 – Technology
700 – Arts & recreation
800 – Literature
900 – History & geography

000 is sub-divided into the hundreds group

000 Computer science, knowledge & systems
010 Bibliographies
020 Library & information sciences
030 Encyclopedias & books of facts
040 [Unassigned]
050 Magazines, journals & serials
060 Associations, organizations & museums
070 News media, journalism & publishing
080 Quotations
090 Manuscripts & rare books 

and then sub-divided again into the thousands groups...

000 Computer science, information & general works
001 Knowledge
002 The book
003 Systems
004 Data processing & computer science
005 Computer programming, programs & data
006 Special computer methods
007 [Unassigned]
008 [Unassigned]
009 [Unassigned]

...and then sub-divisions of the thousands are done after the decimal point  -- 001.1, 001.2, etc...

as such, I don't think that callnumber 1.1 is a valid DDC number... it lacks the class and hundred-level group, and should, for the purposes of cn_sort, be converted to 001_100000000000000.

(Numbers above are taken from https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/dewey/DDC%2023_Summaries.pdf).