2015-06-04 14:48 GMT-03:00 Galen Charlton <
gmc@esilibrary.com>:
>
>
Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Tomas Cohen Arazi <
tomascohen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> to our (abuse?) of $dbh->{AutoCommit} = 0 on the tests.
>
>
Not abuse - one way or another, the DB-dependent tests really ought
> not
to be make permanent changes to the database.
Agreed.
> > Before someone says it: reverting the commits will put us back to
the
> > previous state, of course. But it will just hide the problem
for a while.
>
> Time to revert regardless. :)
Unless we do what you propose :)
> However, here's a diff that shows one way to get DBIx::Class and
DBI
> to stop fighting over who gets to control the transaction:
>
http://paste.lisp.org/display/149194Thanks
for the solution.
--
Tomás Cohen Arazi
Prosecretaría de
Informática
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
✆ +54 351 5353750 ext
13168
GPG: B76C 6E7C 2D80 551A C765 E225 0A27 2EA1 B2F3 C15F