> light of that, I think two months would be reasonable.

> In
2 months ? That's really a long period, considering we've a 6 months
release cycle, with Feature & String Freeze. That let only a short time
for New Features and Enhancements
I was thinking of 2 ... weeks. Let's cut the fruit in two (frenchism ?)
and say one month ?

> Also, it's worth pointing out that we have a QA *team*. If there's a
> BibLibre patch that's been signed off that isn't getting QAed, it is
> absolutely reasonable for you to e-mail the koha-devel list a message
> something like: "[QA] Does anyone have time to review poor benighted bug
> XXXX?"

By default (at least for me), the "signed off" list is organised by
date. I've the assignee & changed column in the result list, it's
trivial to see who did what, and when it has been signed-off.