Hi,

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:47 AM, MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> wrote:
> Christopher Nighswonger wrote:
>> In light of the momentum the community has built up in the area of
>> change in recent months, now would be a good time to resume licensing
>> discussions and bring them to a final resolve.
>
> I cannot contribute fully to this discussion at this time.  Please can
> we try to limit the number of simultaneous disruptive changes?  As you
> know, we have 3.2 releasing, new websites and urgent trademark
> challenges which I'd like to contribute to and my work is already
> spread a bit too thin.  Please can we leave this until after 3.2.0?

I, for one, do not want to attempt relicensing prior to release of
3.2.0 or as a condition for release of that version.  Personally,
while I am currently in favor of relicensing to GPL3+ (assuming that
we can resolve the matter of dependencies on GPL2 code such as
OpenNCIP) and think that the AGPL3 should be considered as well, it
would be too disruptive to even think of doing this for 3.2.

However, since the proposal is relevant for 3.4, I do think that now
is as a good a time as any to start a discussion of this issue.