Hi Tomas,

 

we rely heavily on the described behaviour to hide the record if all items are hidden. It seems logical to me - what will a user do with a record, that has no items? They can't place a hold, they don't know where to find it, which library owns copies etc. To me it seems more confusing then helpful.

 

I think we shouldn't change the behaviour, especially because it has always worked like described and libraries might be unpleasantly surprised by a sudden change. Having the different behaviour as a configuration option would make sense.