No problem, MJ.
For the rest of the developers, maybe we should schedule an irc meeting about this issue. It seems to be quite a hot topic ; )
Kyle
"Kyle Hall" < kyle.m.hall@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you trust O'Reilly <http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/1438>?
Enough for this. Thanks for the link. So, one of subversion's
managers was the author of anon-cvs, if I understand that right.
> On another
> note, who cares? This is not germane to the topic at hand. It was just a
> passing comment.
If it's off-topic, don't mention it. OTOH, I think it was relevant,
suggesting that subversion was made by experienced gurus. Maybe, but
no more than many: svn devels didn't seem to understand Tom Lord's
explanations (he's good on version control design, but maybe not so
good on user interaction), I've seen horribly-wedged svn servers and
IIRC svn's early mv command was basically an rm and an add, which was
no better than cvs.
> I think you need to relax a little ; )
Don't rely on detecting emotional states from the words people use -
it varies massively from place to place. Instead, rely on what they
write. In other words: I'm quite relaxed. Thanks for your concern.
Regards,
--
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Webmaster/web developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop maker,
developer of koha, debian, gobo, gnustep, various mail and web s/w.
Workers co-op @ Weston-super-Mare, Somerset http://www.ttllp.co.uk/