Return-Path: <abanks@buscominc.com>
Delivered-To: online.fr-paul.poulain@free.fr
Received: (qmail 1987 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2003 17:30:56 -0000
Received: from pc2.buscominc.com (HELO aurora.buscominc.com) (65.217.35.9)
  by mrelay1-1.free.fr with SMTP; 3 Mar 2003 17:30:56 -0000
Received: from [192.168.249.254] by aurora.buscominc.com
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 1 (built Aug 19 2002))
 with ESMTPA id <0HB6005MHO809M@aurora.buscominc.com> for
 paul.poulain@free.fr;
 Mon, 03 Mar 2003 11:21:39 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 11:38:41 -0600
From: Al Banks <abanks@buscominc.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Koha DB]
In-reply-to: <3E638B79.1010705@free.fr>
To: paul POULAIN <paul.poulain@free.fr>
Message-id: <1046713125.18929.14.camel@straave>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
References: <1046710244.1708.52.camel@feclar> <3E638B79.1010705@free.fr>

Ok, cool.

I'll start looking through the SQL to see how big of a task I'm talking
about...

Maybe we'll have something like this for the 3.0 :->

-Al=20

On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 11:06, paul POULAIN wrote:
> Al Banks wrote:
>=20
> >I've been reading through the db schema, and have a few questions...
> >
> >First, are you the db lead?  (I don't want to waste your time...)
> >
> I think I can assume this leading too :-)
>=20
> >Does a data dictionary exist for this project?
> >
> No, and i think it's really a pain... there is just a jpg in the wiki=20
> and it's quite out-dated.
> Note I've discovered that phpmyadmin can do a LOT of thinks in the last=20
> 2.4.0 version like (virtual) constaint references, and pdf output of the=20
> DB-schema.
>=20
> >I was working on porting
> >the schema to postgres, and was wondering about the borrowernumber being
> >an int(11).  Are cardnumbers fixed-length 11 digits?
> >
> in the koha code ? no, i dont think so. there is just a specific=20
> checkdigit script that katipo did at beginning of koha and that is still=20
> in use.
> The borrowernumber must pass this check routine at the moment.
> will probably be removed/modularized in a 2.0.x version (where x >0)
>=20
> >There are a couple of tables for deleted items, borrowers, etc.  Is this
> >a requirement?  I would think that adding a 'deleted' boolean in the
> >main record would do the same function, and save a couple of tables.
> > =20
> >
> O'm not the author of the deletedXXX tables.
> I partially agree with you, but deleting those tables would mean having=20
> a deep look to all the code, as we would have to add "and=20
> deleteflag=3Dfalse" in every sql statement.
> It's completly out of scope of the 2.0 release (and this time i'm sure i=20
> can say this coz i'm 2.0 official release manager :-D )
>=20
> --=20
> Paul POULAIN
> Consultant ind=C3=A9pendant en logiciels libres
> responsable francophone de koha (SIGB libre http://www.koha-fr.org)
>=20
>=20




