Hi Dave - Welcome to Koha. I'm the new QA Manager. You wrote:
I do however have quite a few suggestions and bugs to point out (I'm running > version 1.2.3) and I was wondering whether or not to send them all through > Bugzilla. How active and useful is it?
My response is PLEEEEESE report any bugs you find through Bugzilla. http://bugs.koha.org/ It is very active. Saturday as I was testing and posting bugs I kept on getting emails saying that the bugs that I had posted were fixed. I couldn't keep up. Of course the trickier ones take longer. There are programmers working on Koha who specialize in fixing bugs. They sit down and look at the list and proceed. The developers also work from the Bugzilla list. And the Bugzilla list also assists users (especially the less technically oriented ones) - am I doing something wrong or is it a bug? I know you're a developer but let me add this link for others who may not be familiar with Bugzilla. http://www.saas.nsw.edu.au/wiki/index.php?page=BugReportingForNewbies Thanks, Ingrid Ingrid Lacis The Cherry Hill Company www.chillco.com 11664 National Blvd. #143 Los Angeles, CA 90064 (310) 397-2999 ilacis@chillco.com _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Ingrid Lacis <ilacis@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is very active. Saturday as I was testing and posting bugs I kept on getting emails saying that the bugs that I had posted were fixed. I couldn't keep up. Of course the trickier ones take longer.
I'm noticing very few bugs moving to VERIFIED. Is this something that needs more people to help with the QA?
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, MJ Ray wrote:
Ingrid Lacis <ilacis@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is very active. Saturday as I was testing and posting bugs I kept on getting emails saying that the bugs that I had posted were fixed. I couldn't keep up. Of course the trickier ones take longer.
I'm noticing very few bugs moving to VERIFIED. Is this something that needs more people to help with the QA?
This would be an awesome (and low badnwidth) task for somebod(y|ies) to take on. -pate
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/koha-devel
Pat Eyler wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, MJ Ray wrote:
Ingrid Lacis <ilacis@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is very active. Saturday as I was testing and posting bugs I kept on getting emails saying that the bugs that I had posted were fixed. I couldn't keep up. Of course the trickier ones take longer.
I'm noticing very few bugs moving to VERIFIED. Is this something that needs more people to help with the QA?
This would be an awesome (and low badnwidth) task for somebod(y|ies) to take on.
for sure, that would be nice. The question being : should it be done on a released version (1.9.3 for today's bugs) or on CVS. I think doing this on a released version would be better. -- Paul POULAIN Consultant indépendant en logiciels libres responsable francophone de koha (SIGB libre http://www.koha-fr.org)
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, paul POULAIN wrote:
Pat Eyler wrote:
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, MJ Ray wrote:
I'm noticing very few bugs moving to VERIFIED. Is this something that needs more people to help with the QA?
This would be an awesome (and low badnwidth) task for somebod(y|ies) to take on.
for sure, that would be nice. The question being : should it be done on a released version (1.9.3 for today's bugs) or on CVS. I think doing this on a released version would be better.
I agree ... they should be verified against the latest release, and fixed in the CVS. -pate
-- Paul POULAIN Consultant ind�pendant en logiciels libres responsable francophone de koha (SIGB libre http://www.koha-fr.org)
Pat Eyler <pate@eylerfamily.org> wrote:
I agree ... they should be verified against the latest release, and fixed in the CVS.
Uh, VERIFIED state is to verify the closure. This means bugfixes can only be verified against a release. That may or may not be what you want. Personally, I think that's a good idea, as it should make it easier to batch QA work until 2.0. MJR
participants (4)
-
Ingrid Lacis -
MJ Ray -
Pat Eyler -
paul POULAIN