Blog post about BibLibre development rebases
Hello all, I wrote a blog post about our developments and the community integration. You can read it here: http://drupal.biblibre.com/en/blog/entry/biblibre-developpments-rebase-and-y... It is about: - 2012 goals development rebases - Vision and roadmap - Progress and learnt of january and february - Why the community needs you The purpose was to make visible our work and explain how people can invest into this development integration (for example for our french customers). If you have questions, juste ask. Have a good day, Claire;
Hello, We continue to invest a lot of time and energy to this task (and signoff and qa) but it seems that today, the goal fixed at the beginning of the year can't be reached, because in 3 months no progress is really noticable... Have a look https://docs.google.com/a/biblibre.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuZF5Y_c4pIxdHE3... I found 37 bugs assigned to BibLibre people which are in a "Needs Signoff" status. I follow 25 of them with a special attention in the google doc: https://docs.google.com/a/biblibre.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuZF5Y_c4pIxdHE3... https://trello.com/board/community-biblibre-koha-devs/4f1d247284210f0e6300d7... We could continue (would like) to provide more patches and features (serials and all others). I would like to keep the queue under 20-30 to avoid rebasing all the time. There is also a dependency "problem". Today, we really would like to see these 3 bugzilla moving forward: - 5335 More granular VAT => I know that not everybody is interested in and this is a big patch and big work - 5342 Serial claiming improvement - 7294 status "in order" (not in needs signoff today but soon, keep an eye on it) Thanks in advance for your committment for signing patches, Claire; On 05/03/2012 17:12, Claire Hernandez wrote:
Hello all,
I wrote a blog post about our developments and the community integration. You can read it here: http://drupal.biblibre.com/en/blog/entry/biblibre-developpments-rebase-and-y...
It is about: - 2012 goals development rebases - Vision and roadmap - Progress and learnt of january and february - Why the community needs you
The purpose was to make visible our work and explain how people can invest into this development integration (for example for our french customers).
If you have questions, juste ask.
Have a good day, Claire;
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
* Claire Hernandez (claire.hernandez@biblibre.com) wrote:
Hello,
We continue to invest a lot of time and energy to this task (and signoff and qa) but it seems that today, the goal fixed at the beginning of the year can't be reached, because in 3 months no progress is really noticable... Have a look https://docs.google.com/a/biblibre.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuZF5Y_c4pIxdHE3...
To that end, I have been creating the statistics of signoffs http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/2012/04/01/bug-statistics-for-march-2012/ http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/2012/05/04/statistics-for-koha-april-2012/ http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/2012/06/01/bugenh-statistics-for-may-2012/ http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/2012/07/01/bugzilla-statistics-for-june-2012/ So people can recognise the hard work of the people doing sign offs Do some sign offs, become famous!! Save some kittens! Chris -- Chris Cormack Catalyst IT Ltd. +64 4 803 2238 PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington 6142, New Zealand
On 05/07/2012 20:46, Chris Cormack wrote:
To that end, I have been creating the statistics of signoffs
http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/2012/04/01/bug-statistics-for-march-2012/ http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/2012/05/04/statistics-for-koha-april-2012/ http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/2012/06/01/bugenh-statistics-for-may-2012/ http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/2012/07/01/bugzilla-statistics-for-june-2012/
So people can recognise the hard work of the people doing sign offs
Do some sign offs, become famous!! Save some kittens! Hello Chris,
I am not sure to understand why you answer me that. I wasn't saying that nothing is done. What I am saying is a measure of our (BibLibre) investment (people, time and energy) versus the result (and metrics I have put to follow it). We are able to challenge our (BibLibre) practices if you (community) have feedback to give us. Secondly, signoffs statistics does not say everything : as Marcel show this morning, a patch can be signed-off multiple times before being integrated (and my main metric is "done" as "patch pushed"). Furthermore, the main patches attached are not bugfixes but enhancements which needs acceptance tests and non regression validation. If you sort bugs that "need signoff" by change date, that's clear that almost of patches waiting are enhancements. The most important thing for me is the value added we deliver to users at the end... Thanks, Claire.
Claire, I was just trying to encourage more people to sign off by showing them that they would end up in the stats reports. Hence the do some sign offs, become famous. I thought that is what you were wanting. Chris Claire Hernandez <claire.hernandez@biblibre.com> wrote: On 05/07/2012 20:46, Chris Cormack wrote:
To that end, I have been creating the statistics of signoffs
http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/2012/04/01/bug-statistics-for-march-2012/ http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/2012/05/04/statistics-for-koha-april-2012/ http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/2012/06/01/bugenh-statistics-for-may-2012/ http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/2012/07/01/bugzilla-statistics-for-june-2012/
So people can recognise the hard work of the people doing sign offs
Do some sign offs, become famous!! Save some kittens! Hello Chris,
I am not sure to understand why you answer me that. I wasn't saying that nothing is done. What I am saying is a measure of our (BibLibre) investment (people, time and energy) versus the result (and metrics I have put to follow it). We are able to challenge our (BibLibre) practices if you (community) have feedback to give us. Secondly, signoffs statistics does not say everything : as Marcel show this morning, a patch can be signed-off multiple times before being integrated (and my main metric is "done" as "patch pushed"). Furthermore, the main patches attached are not bugfixes but enhancements which needs acceptance tests and non regression validation. If you sort bugs that "need signoff" by change date, that's clear that almost of patches waiting are enhancements. The most important thing for me is the value added we deliver to users at the end... Thanks, Claire.
On 7 July 2012 03:58, Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
Claire,
I was just trying to encourage more people to sign off by showing them that they would end up in the stats reports.
Hence the do some sign offs, become famous. I thought that is what you were wanting.
In order to perhaps help get more people signing off, I wrote a little script that writes out json of the last sign offs. I then wrote some jquery to pull that in after a set interval. http://stats.workbuffer.org/scroller.html Please ignore how hideous it looks, or better yet, please help me with some css to make it less hideous if people think it is worth continuing. It was a late night Saturday night idea, so might be dumb :) If not I was thinking signoffs.koha-community.org Chris
Hi all, I really like this idea and we talked about it some more on IRC this weekend. Chris added some new elements with important information to the page: - last 5 sign offs - 'needs signoff' with the 5 oldest bugs waiting to get tested - a list of current bug status numbers - 'random bug' to give you some inspiratoin on what to fix next Take a look and get inspired to do lots of sign offs and bug work! New URL: http://dashboard.koha-community.org/ Katrin -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: koha-devel-bounces@lists.koha-community.org im Auftrag von Chris Cormack Gesendet: Sa 07.07.2012 13:44 An: koha@lists.katipo.co.nz Cc: koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org Betreff: Re: [Koha-devel] [Koha] BibLibre efforts on reversing developments and you On 7 July 2012 03:58, Chris Cormack <chrisc@catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
Claire,
I was just trying to encourage more people to sign off by showing them that they would end up in the stats reports.
Hence the do some sign offs, become famous. I thought that is what you were wanting.
In order to perhaps help get more people signing off, I wrote a little script that writes out json of the last sign offs. I then wrote some jquery to pull that in after a set interval. http://stats.workbuffer.org/scroller.html Please ignore how hideous it looks, or better yet, please help me with some css to make it less hideous if people think it is worth continuing. It was a late night Saturday night idea, so might be dumb :) If not I was thinking signoffs.koha-community.org Chris _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
Le 08/07/2012 12:33, Fischer, Katrin a écrit :
Hi all,
I really like this idea and we talked about it some more on IRC this weekend.
Chris added some new elements with important information to the page:
- last 5 sign offs What would be very interesting imo, would be the 5 (or 10 ?) bugs that are "need signoff" and haven't changed since the longest period ("oldest need signoff")
I'm always sad when I see a bug submitted yesterday signed off when some bugs have no activity for more 2 months ! -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08
On 9 July 2012 21:34, Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com> wrote:
Le 08/07/2012 12:33, Fischer, Katrin a écrit :
Hi all,
I really like this idea and we talked about it some more on IRC this weekend.
Chris added some new elements with important information to the page:
- last 5 sign offs What would be very interesting imo, would be the 5 (or 10 ?) bugs that are "need signoff" and haven't changed since the longest period ("oldest need signoff")
It's already there, at the bottom of the page Before the jenkins status. Needs signoff ordered by the last time it was changed, ascending
I'm always sad when I see a bug submitted yesterday signed off when some bugs have no activity for more 2 months !
I'm sometimes sad, depends on the bug. Chris
-- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
Le 09/07/2012 11:38, Chris Cormack a écrit :
On 9 July 2012 21:34, Paul Poulain <paul.poulain@biblibre.com> wrote:
Le 08/07/2012 12:33, Fischer, Katrin a écrit :
Hi all,
I really like this idea and we talked about it some more on IRC this weekend.
Chris added some new elements with important information to the page:
- last 5 sign offs What would be very interesting imo, would be the 5 (or 10 ?) bugs that are "need signoff" and haven't changed since the longest period ("oldest need signoff")
It's already there, at the bottom of the page Hey, I saw "Needs signoff", I missed that is was the 5 oldest needing signoff !!! maybe that would be worth changing the wording (and adding something like : "5635 bulkmarcimport new parameters & features is waiting since XXX days to be signed-off"
-- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08
participants (5)
-
Chris Cormack -
Chris Cormack -
Claire Hernandez -
Fischer, Katrin -
Paul Poulain