At 11:29 AM 2/28/2014 -0800, Galen Charlton wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Paul A <paul.a@navalmarinearchive.com> wrote: [snip]
-rw-rw---- 1 mysql mysql 1117782016 Feb 28 18:43 ibdata1 [log files identical]
Two questions if I may. First, are my numbers typical?
Hard to say without knowing how many bibs you have.
Thanks Galen -- ~35k bibs , but (probably atypically because of serials) more than 150k items.
Regardless, if you're not using the innodb_file_per_table option, [snip]
No -- we're not at the moment. Next upgrade (May/June this year), we intend (but see MariaDB below) to use mysql 5.6 which defaults to per_table.
Second, has MariaDB been shelved permanently? Far from it. At present, I've seen no issues using MariaDB 5.5 as a drop-in replacement for MySQL, either on my personal development boxes or in production use.
Sounds good (particularly the "production use" part) -- I had seen Bug 5366 which doesn't appear to be signed off. Is there a Koha write-up anywhere on implementing MariaDB? I've never even played with it, but understand that the Oracle/ibdata problem is non-existent. tnx and br -- paul
participants (1)
-
Paul A