http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=557 seems to be specific to a single site. How should we handle it? It seems that we will have a fix for http://bugs.koha.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=561 today but should there be a category for "Templates"? Other edited highlights of the shortened meeting: <slef> 59 bugs open, 6 new this week, 310 bugfixes awaiting checking, 0 awaiting closure <owen> If you don't mind, could you talk about 'bugfixes awaiting checking'? What needs to be done there? <slef> Those are bugs that a developer says they fixed, but no-one has checked that independently. It shows up on koha if you search for bugs marked "RESOLVED" against 1.9x and 2.0 version. If you have a 2.0 pre-release koha running, you can check to see if a bug reported as fixed before it was released really is. <owen> So anyone can (and should) go in and check those fixes? <slef> Yes, please. I'm still plodding through installer fixes, so I've not done any for a few weeks. <slef> It would be great if we can catch any half-fixed bugs before 2.0.0 <slef> 2.0.0pre2 was released on 9 July <slef> The bug life cycle is something like: reported -> NEW -> ASSIGNED -> RESOLVED -> VERIFIED -> CLOSED <slef> right now, we're not getting that many reports, but things seem to go from NEW to RESOLVED quite quick and they get stuck there just now. <slef> owen: oh, small point: the developers of that part of koha should not be the ones to mark a bug VERIFIED I think -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ jabber://slef@jabber.at Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ Thought: Edwin A Abbott wrote about trouble with Windows in 1884