Hi all, I want to update the template to show the right text, but I don't know for sure which is which and figure one of those of you who have done dev work will know: The dontmerge preference says "Don't automatically update attached biblios when changing an authority record. If this is off, please ask your administrator to enable the merge_authorities.pl cronjob". -- it shouldn't say OFF - what should it say? "if this is set to 'do'" - which is off? do or don't? Thanks Nicole
Le 01/06/2010 19:38, Nicole Engard a écrit :
Hi all,
I want to update the template to show the right text, but I don't know for sure which is which and figure one of those of you who have done dev work will know:
The dontmerge preference says "Don't automatically update attached biblios when changing an authority record. If this is off, please ask your administrator to enable the merge_authorities.pl cronjob". -- it shouldn't say OFF - what should it say? "if this is set to 'do'" - which is off? do or don't?
Hi Nicole, as far as that system preference is concerned, and in accordance to the Coding Guidelines which ask that NO systempreference should have a negative noun or effect, this preference is now replaced by MergeAuthoritiesOnUpdate which, if set edits all the related biblios and reports the heading into them. Hopes that helps. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:49 PM, LAURENT Henri-Damien <henridamien.laurent@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Nicole, as far as that system preference is concerned, and in accordance to the Coding Guidelines which ask that NO systempreference should have a negative noun or effect, this preference is now replaced by MergeAuthoritiesOnUpdate which, if set edits all the related biblios and reports the heading into them. Hopes that helps.
This preference is not in HEAD as of yet - when it is there will dontmerge be removed? If so then it helps because we won't have that poorly worded preference summary anymore :) Nicole
See : http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3178 this patch was never complete which explains why I don't have the new preference. On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Nicole Engard <nengard@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:49 PM, LAURENT Henri-Damien <henridamien.laurent@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Nicole, as far as that system preference is concerned, and in accordance to the Coding Guidelines which ask that NO systempreference should have a negative noun or effect, this preference is now replaced by MergeAuthoritiesOnUpdate which, if set edits all the related biblios and reports the heading into them. Hopes that helps.
This preference is not in HEAD as of yet - when it is there will dontmerge be removed? If so then it helps because we won't have that poorly worded preference summary anymore :)
Nicole
participants (2)
-
LAURENT Henri-Damien -
Nicole Engard