The work on bibliografic relationships (RFC 3.4 Analytic Record support)
Hi to all, as I say, I have a sponsor to develop this RFC. Savitra Sirohi wrote here that want to do the work in Oct 2010. I can also work on this RFC in Oct 2010, but also later. Probably aslo one person from ByWater has a task on this RFC (Ian Walls?) Are there others developers ? I think we need to start to coordinate ourselves. Do we need a bug on bugzilla ? A specific git server / branch ? How to develop in parallel ? I have add a chat log about this RFC in http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Talk:Analytic_Record_support I also add same consideration about MARC21 and Unimarc here: http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Analytic_Record_support#MARC21_and_Unima... My consideration: --I dont' want to use the embedded fields in Unimarc, too complex to use --In the near future I will add a optional plugin in z39.50 section to traslate Unimarc 4xx fields done with embedded fields to 4xx fields with standard fields. In Italy all Unimarc z39.50 server use embedded fields. -- I like the idea to have all relation in SQL tables but with the option to insert them into MARC data. For me the default is 'insert them into MARC, select to not insert' -- I suggest the idea to work manly with cataloguing plugins Bye Zeno -- Zeno Tajoli CILEA - Segrate (MI) tajoliAT_SPAM_no_prendiATcilea.it (Indirizzo mascherato anti-spam; sostituisci qaunto tra AT con @)
participants (1)
-
Zeno Tajoli