Hi all, I've been working to determine which fonts work best for all browsers/OSes when using UTF-8 and I ran across this email: http://lists.indexdata.dk/pipermail/yazlist/2006-April/001586.html That suggests: font-family: Lucida Grande, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif; I've tried it and it does seem to be the best option. I propose that NPL templates in rel_2_2 switch to this font and in Koha 2.4/3.0 we use it as well. The current NPL font-family setting doesn't work well for geko-based browsers on OSX (combined characters in particular aren't displayed combined (and the second character is often represented as a box) in Arial or sans-serif). Any comments? -- Joshua Ferraro SUPPORT FOR OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE President, Technology migration, training, maintenance, support LibLime Featuring Koha Open-Source ILS jmf@liblime.com |Full Demos at http://liblime.com/koha |1(888)KohaILS
Joshua Ferraro <jmf@liblime.com>
http://lists.indexdata.dk/pipermail/yazlist/2006-April/001586.html That suggests: font-family: Lucida Grande, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif; [...] Any comments?
That doesn't list any browsers /GNU as far as I can see and I suspect that will either use another Lucida font or Helvetica here. Are there test pages? Personally, I've never noticed much display trouble as long as Unicode browsers use Unicode fonts for Unicode pages - Firefox packages still seem to be configured by some distributions to use Latin-1 fonts for Unicode, which is surprising. Thanks, -- MJR/slef Laux nur mia opinio: vidu http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Bv sekvu http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
participants (2)
-
Joshua Ferraro -
MJ Ray