Paul Poulain wrote:

- http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Category:Abandoned_RFC => contains abandoned rfcs (because it's no more relevant or we have lost contact with the developer)

I've rescued two of them (multi-level biblios and requiring items) which I'd still like to see in 3.4 although I have no funding for them at the moment.

on page : http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Category:RFCs there are still 19 pages that I don't know what to do with.

FOLLOW-UP => ANYONE who has entered a RFCs on the wiki should go and double-check that it's at the right place. On some RFCs, the author was displayed in the RFC itself (BibLibre or Liblime most of the time, but a few others), but the edition history has been lost when we moved the wiki. So, for many RFCs, there is no information in the RFC itself and it seems to have been filed by nengard, which is wrong.

Why didn't you ask? I have a copy of what I think is the edit history, although the move also disrupted it by renaming many pages. Here is a list of RFC creator usernames from the old wiki: rfcs3.2:rfc32_hourly_circ gmc created rfcs3.2:rfc32_email_checkout_slips gmc created rfcs3.2:rfc32_fine_thresholds gmc created rfcs3.2:rfc32_opening_hours gmc created rfcs3.2:rfc32_recalls gmc created rfcs3.2:rfc32_holdability_flag gmc created rfcs3.2:rfc32_notifications_and_opac_messaging gmc created rfcs3.2:rfc32_system_groups gmc created rfcs3.2:rfc32_marcstructure_translation eric.begin created rfcs3.2:rfc32_description_translation eric.begin created rfcs3.2:rfc32_readingrecordhistory tipaul created reading record management by patron rfcs3.2:acq-permissions nicomo created rfcs3.2:create-item-when-ordering nicomo created rfcs3.2:enhance-closing-basket nicomo created rfcs3.2:refining-budgets nicomo created rfcs3.2:better-stats-about-acq nicomo created rfcs3.2:refining-budgets-management nicomo created rfcs3.2:bib-search-acq nicomo created rfcs3.2:searches-on-orders nicomo created rfcs3.2:suggestion-opac-searchtest nicomo created rfcs3.2:suggestion-opac-hold nicomo created rfcs3.2:suggestion-staff-workflow nicomo created rfcs3.2:pqf_search tipaul created rfcs3.2:display_item tipaul created : RFC for displaying items in large networks rfcs3.2:rfc32_koha_api_uml_diagrams_and_e-r_diagrams tajoli created rfcs3.2:rfc32_guided_reports tipaul created guided reports improved rfcs3.2:rfc32_turn_on_warnings gmc created rfcs3.2:rfc32_general_holds_improvement gmc created rfcs3.2:rfc32_hold_request_targeting gmc created rfcs3.2:rfc32_ajax_in_the_staff_interface pianohacker created rfcs3.2:rfc32_advancedpatronsearch danny.bouman created RFC for advanced patron search rfcs3.2:buying-analysis tipaul created rfcs3.2:rfc32_cas_compatibility nicomo created rfcs3.2:rfc32_unsaved_changes_notification danny.bouman created rfcs3.2:advanced_cataloging_search danny.bouman created rfcs3.2:rfc32_fast_add danny.bouman created rfcs3.2:rfc32_syndetics_support danny.bouman created rfcs3.2:rfc32_place_hold_multiple_items danny.bouman created rfcs3.2:rfc32_tag_multiple_items danny.bouman created rfcs3.2:rfc32_holdings_structure gmc created rfcs3.2:authority_control_improvements gmc created rfcs3.2:rfc32_brief_records gmc created rfcs3.2:improved_batch_capabilities danny.bouman created rfcs3.2:rfc32_improved_permissions danny.bouman created rfcs3.2:rfc32_staff_place_hold_opac danny.bouman created rfcs3.2:rfc32_import_export_system_preferences danny.bouman created rfcs3.2:rfc32_barcode_prefixes rch created rfcs3.2:rfc32_multiple_opac rch created rfcs3.2:rfc32_take_items_out_of_bib gmc created rfcs3.2:storequeries hdl created rfcs3.2:rfc32_improved_security pustake created rfcs3.2:rfc32_item_level_itemtypes rch created rfcs3.2:blocking_non_blocking_rules tipaul created rfcs3.2:fines_in_days tipaul created rfcs3.2:dbix-class amoore created rfcs3.2:rfc32_biblio_table rch created rfcs3.2:rfc32_subtitle_field mdhafen created rfcs3.2:requiring_items mjr created rfcs3.2:rfc32_circ_policies rch created rfcs3.2:rfc32_patronselfprivacy tipaul created : RFC for patron dealing with their Reading History at OPAC If any appear multiple times, I think the later ones are translations. Perhaps someone could recover any RFCs that they think are/should not be abandoned, based on that list? Regards, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. Webmaster, Debian Developer, Past Koha RM, statistician, former lecturer. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire for various work http://www.software.coop/products/