Hi to all, after a little time of quietness I had now found time to translate at least the OPAC to german. Now as I wanted to test it I had to recognize that the actual cvs is not working :-( Much of the development goes into different branches. I think this is not clever for futur-releases. What is the reason for the confusing branch situation? Couldn't we merge some branches to the main-trunk? What about rel-1-2? Could it be that some branches are more actual than the main trunk? Can somebody explain me what part of the development goes in what branch and why not in the main-trunk. Sorry, I'm not the cvs-geek! dorian
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 06:18:44PM +0100, Dorian Meid said:
Hi to all, after a little time of quietness I had now found time to translate at least the OPAC to german. Now as I wanted to test it I had to recognize that the actual cvs is not working :-( Much of the development goes into different branches. I think this is not clever for futur-releases. What is the reason for the confusing branch situation?
Hiya Dorian Its not really as bad as it seems :-) There are only 2 real branches rel-1-2 and the main trunk. The rel-1-2 branch should have no active development being done in it anymore. Its the branch the 1.2.x releases come from. There will be at most one more release from this branch. All development should be being done in the main trunk. Which is where the 1.3.x releases come from. And is the future of koha. Any development done in rel-1-2 (and i stress there should be none:-), but sometimes it slips in) Should be merged back into the main trunk as well. As soon as the 2.0 release is done, the rel-1-2 branch will cease to be of any importance at all. I hope this helps some Chris -- Chris Cormack Programmer 025 500 789 Katipo Communications Ltd chris@katipo.co.nz www.katipo.co.nz
participants (2)
-
Chris Cormack -
Dorian Meid