Hi, I test an adaptation of Fluid 960 Grid System ( http://www.designinfluences.com/fluid960gs ) with Koha 3.2.5 and I have great results on my test OPAC ( http://minhabiblioteca.com/ or http://109.123.108.51/ ). The Fluid 960 Grid System is more flexible than Yahoo UI. Its possible to think about change grid system on official koha template? Cheers, -- Tiago Murakami
Le 02/03/2011 01:03, Tiago Murakami a écrit :
Hi,
I test an adaptation of Fluid 960 Grid System ( http://www.designinfluences.com/fluid960gs ) with Koha 3.2.5 and I have great results on my test OPAC ( http://minhabiblioteca.com/ or http://109.123.108.51/ ). The Fluid 960 Grid System is more flexible than Yahoo UI. Its possible to think about change grid system on official koha template? Hi Tiago,
in fact we plan to abandon YUI not to adopt Fluid960, but switch to jquery-ui. nothing done on this matter though. -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08
in fact we plan to abandon YUI not to adopt Fluid960, but switch to jquery-ui.
This is incorrect. We plan to abandon use of the YUI JavaScript library in favor of jQuery-UI. We will continue to use the YUI Grids CSS framework
nothing done on this matter though.
I have already put in several hours of work on the jQuery-UI conversion. All of it is publicly available in a branch called "ip-bug-5481-jquery-ui-2010-12-09" at http://gitorious.org/koha-dev/koha-dev. It's still a work in progress as far as completeness is concerned, but most of the converted elements should be working properly. -- Owen -- Web Developer Athens County Public Libraries http://www.myacpl.org
Hi, 2011/3/1 Tiago Murakami <trmurakami@gmail.com>:
I test an adaptation of Fluid 960 Grid System ( http://www.designinfluences.com/fluid960gs ) with Koha 3.2.5 and I have great results on my test OPAC ( http://minhabiblioteca.com/ or http://109.123.108.51/ ). The Fluid 960 Grid System is more flexible than Yahoo UI. Its possible to think about change grid system on official koha template?
We would need a bit more information to consider this. Do you have patches we could look at? Guidance on what it would take to convert the entire OPAC and/or staff interface? Something a bit more specific to explain why you believe this is more flexible than YUI? This is not to speak one way or the other on the merits of your proposal, but since, unlike the date picker, this isn't such an obvious win, a bit more information would help. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton gmcharlt@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Galen Charlton <gmcharlt@gmail.com> wrote:
This is not to speak one way or the other on the merits of your proposal, but since, unlike the date picker, this isn't such an obvious win, a bit more information would help.
Getting more into design and planning philosophy than the specifics at hand, see-- http://960.gs/ The 960 scheme can be thought of as a spacing framework. This is something that's easy to not see you wished you had until it's far too late and you've got a lot of page components bulging out in untidy ways. It's probably a good thing to be looking at as a follow on to the template toolkit conversion. -reed
participants (5)
-
Galen Charlton -
Owen Leonard -
Paul Poulain -
Reed Wade -
Tiago Murakami