Release Manager for 2.4
Hi all I was having a think the other night, about possible candidates for release manager for 2.4. Id like to suggest Joshua from NPL and Liblime. If he's willing of course. I think its important to share the release manager duties around. Paul has done a great job but I think it would be nice to let him concentrate on programming for a while and let someone else take over the management role for the next big release. Joshua has been involved with Koha for quite some time, and I think that because he doesnt come from a programmer background would bring some new/different skills to the release managers role. Any thoughts/suggestions/other nominations? Chris -- Chris Cormack Programmer 027 4500 789 Katipo Communications Ltd chris@katipo.co.nz www.katipo.co.nz
I'd be happy to serve as 2.4 release manager, and I'm honored that you thought of me. Being heavily invested in Koha on two fronts now (NPL and LibLime), I've got quite a few ideas for what should go into version 2.4, as well as what needs to be fixed in code carried over from 2.2 before I'd consider 2.4 stable. LibLime will have financial resources to devote to some of these 2.4 projects and I believe I can effectively help to coordinate the efforts of other developers and keep 2.4 on track. I'm good at making lists and bugging folks to fix things ;-), I'm very active on #koha and the Koha lists (so I'm easy to get a hold of) and I'm in constant contact with librarians who use Koha every day (and have ideas for how it could be improved). My primary concern with 2.4 will be Quality Assurance both in existing code and any new code that is committed. Over the next few days I'll put together a list of what my specific 2.4 goals would be should I be selected as 2.4 release manager and I'll post that to the koha-devel list. Thanks, -- Joshua Ferraro VENDOR SERVICES FOR OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE CEO, LIBLIME migration, training, maintenance, support jmf@liblime.com Koha ILS, Mambo Intranet, DiscrimiNet Filter 1(740)707-7654 TRY OUR FULL DEMOS AT http://liblime.com On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 11:31:58AM +1200, Chris Cormack wrote:
Hi all
I was having a think the other night, about possible candidates for release manager for 2.4.
Id like to suggest Joshua from NPL and Liblime. If he's willing of course. I think its important to share the release manager duties around. Paul has done a great job but I think it would be nice to let him concentrate on programming for a while and let someone else take over the management role for the next big release.
Joshua has been involved with Koha for quite some time, and I think that because he doesnt come from a programmer background would bring some new/different skills to the release managers role.
Any thoughts/suggestions/other nominations?
Chris -- Chris Cormack Programmer 027 4500 789 Katipo Communications Ltd chris@katipo.co.nz www.katipo.co.nz
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20 _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/koha-devel
Hello, I got a Question I had installed the koha 2.2.1 on linux 9.2 But when I would open the start page access forbidden is coming. At the moment I don't know what I could do. I'm looking forward to hear from you ! Jochen Geiser
Jochen Geiser a écrit :
Hello,
I got a Question I had installed the koha 2.2.1 on linux 9.2 But when I would open the start page access forbidden is coming. At the moment I don't know what I could do. I'm looking forward to hear from you !
PLEASE : * begin a new thread when you want to speak of something that is new (don't clic on "reply-to" button) * write a subject that is related to your question * write to the correct mailing list : koha-devel is for developpment purposes & problem. You it not really a devel problem, it's right place is more the main koha mailing list. -- Paul POULAIN Consultant indépendant en logiciels libres responsable francophone de koha (SIGB libre http://www.koha-fr.org)
Hello Jochen, we have a german speaking mailinglist at koha@de.koha.org You can subscribe via mailto:koha-subscribe@de.koha.org The german list is by far not as active as the english user list or the developer list, to which you are posting right now, is. But maybe we can help you too or even better. Dorian Meid Monday, May 9, 2005, 9:53:25 AM, you wrote:
Hello,
I got a Question I had installed the koha 2.2.1 on linux 9.2 But when I would open the start page access forbidden is coming. At the moment I don't know what I could do. I'm looking forward to hear from you !
Jochen Geiser
Chris Cormack a écrit :
Hi all I was having a think the other night, about possible candidates for release manager for 2.4.
Id like to suggest Joshua from NPL and Liblime. If he's willing of course. I think its important to share the release manager duties around. Paul has done a great job but I think it would be nice to let him concentrate on programming for a while and let someone else take over the management role for the next big release.
Joshua has been involved with Koha for quite some time, and I think that because he doesnt come from a programmer background would bring some new/different skills to the release managers role.
Any thoughts/suggestions/other nominations?
Hi Chris & koha-devel mailing list, Your mail was interesting. However, before choosing anyone, i wanted to give you some informations (from France) : * SAN ouest provence. It's a large "médiathèque" (= french library with multimedia, not only paper books), as large as Nelsonville in fact, which means large for france. * Ineo is a large -french & european- company that is involved in library world. They have something like 70 employees, 25M€ income each year. I was with them in Nelsonville last month. The result of this trip (apart from meeting in real life stephen, owen & joshua that was really great) was that SAN decided definetly to go with Koha. And that's a very very very important news (not sure to have permission to announce it officially, but announcing it anyway ;-) ) For many reasons. First of all, in France, they will give a very big boost to Koha reputation (that is already good it seems !) Second, they plan to add some (many) features to Koha. They have dedicated 3 (yes, three) developpers for this. I'll add them in koha dev list in a few minut (they gave me sf nicknames yesterday : btoumi, hpassini, alaurin). I'll suggest them to introduce themself here (none of them three were in Nelsonville) What i'll request is to write what they will add & publish it ASAP. In fact, i/we already have written some pages (in french) about that. Still has to be completed & translated. But should arrive soon. What will Ineo do in this matter ? Ineo, as a large company, will help SAN to go to Koha. So, they will coordinate dev of new features, help them migrating, teach... More than this, Ineo answered an RFP from a french university (Angers. I think Nicolas Morin reads this list, but he can't say anything on this topic & I can't ask him anything either). They will probably answer RFP from another university (Antilles, french too but closer from US than france) This means Ineo want to appear as a major company in Koha-project. My opinion is that the best way for them to appear is... to take the role of Release Manager. That's an important thing for another reason. Ineo is not known in the OSS world yet, so, taking this role would be the "ticket" for them, imho, to prove they want to play a fair game. They still don't have decided officially. But that should arrive very very very soon. I cc Francois Laurent Contenay (he was in nelsonville) & could be dedicated to this role by Ineo. Once again, that is not an official information, just to warn you. So, the next question is : who, from Joshua or Ineo would be the best RM ? My opinion is that Joshua has more experience in Koha, but there are many other reasons that make me prefer Ineo : - With frenchies (once again ;-) ) on the top of developper list (me, henri damien, sylvain machefert -for ensmp-, SAN, Ineo), it's easier to have ppl with the same working hours. Coordinating would be easier. We just have to be very very careful not to work only with/for frenchies, but stay a world-wide project. That would probably be our main risk (not to be careful enough). - SAN ouest provence has a deadline : they want Koha to be ready on January, 1st. And Ineo don't want them to fail (because Ineo want to be able to say to futures libraries : look, Koha is great, we are koha-experts) It means we need a Release Manager that can work heavily on head. Even 24/7 if needed. So how could we "use" Joshua ? He answered the question himself :
My primary concern with 2.4 will be Quality Assurance both in existing code and any new code that is committed.
Great, we have a QA manager volunteer. That's what we still lacks. Let me know your opinion/reactions. -- Paul POULAIN Consultant indépendant en logiciels libres responsable francophone de koha (SIGB libre http://www.koha-fr.org)
Paul POULAIN wrote:
Hi Chris & koha-devel mailing list,
Your mail was interesting. However, before choosing anyone, i wanted to give you some informations (from France) : * SAN ouest provence. It's a large "médiathèque" (= french library with multimedia, not only paper books), as large as Nelsonville in fact, which means large for france. * Ineo is a large -french & european- company that is involved in library world. They have something like 70 employees, 25M€ income each year.
Thats very cool.
I was with them in Nelsonville last month. The result of this trip (apart from meeting in real life stephen, owen & joshua that was really great) was that SAN decided definetly to go with Koha. And that's a very very very important news (not sure to have permission to announce it officially, but announcing it anyway ;-) )
For many reasons. First of all, in France, they will give a very big boost to Koha reputation (that is already good it seems !) Second, they plan to add some (many) features to Koha. They have dedicated 3 (yes, three) developpers for this. I'll add them in koha dev list in a few minut (they gave me sf nicknames yesterday : btoumi, hpassini, alaurin). I'll suggest them to introduce themself here (none of them three were in Nelsonville)
What i'll request is to write what they will add & publish it ASAP. In fact, i/we already have written some pages (in french) about that. Still has to be completed & translated. But should arrive soon.
Excellent
What will Ineo do in this matter ? Ineo, as a large company, will help SAN to go to Koha. So, they will coordinate dev of new features, help them migrating, teach... More than this, Ineo answered an RFP from a french university (Angers. I think Nicolas Morin reads this list, but he can't say anything on this topic & I can't ask him anything either). They will probably answer RFP from another university (Antilles, french too but closer from US than france) This means Ineo want to appear as a major company in Koha-project. My opinion is that the best way for them to appear is... to take the role of Release Manager. That's an important thing for another reason. Ineo is not known in the OSS world yet, so, taking this role would be the "ticket" for them, imho, to prove they want to play a fair game.
They still don't have decided officially. But that should arrive very very very soon. I cc Francois Laurent Contenay (he was in nelsonville) & could be dedicated to this role by Ineo. Once again, that is not an official information, just to warn you.
So, the next question is : who, from Joshua or Ineo would be the best RM ? My opinion is that Joshua has more experience in Koha, but there are many other reasons that make me prefer Ineo : - With frenchies (once again ;-) ) on the top of developper list (me, henri damien, sylvain machefert -for ensmp-, SAN, Ineo), it's easier to have ppl with the same working hours. Coordinating would be easier. We just have to be very very careful not to work only with/for frenchies, but stay a world-wide project. That would probably be our main risk (not to be careful enough).
Yes, we have a lot of Koha installations to do here in New Zealand (including another public library), and will be working heavily again on Koha. So id imagine id be committing a lot more code again.
- SAN ouest provence has a deadline : they want Koha to be ready on January, 1st. And Ineo don't want them to fail (because Ineo want to be able to say to futures libraries : look, Koha is great, we are koha-experts) It means we need a Release Manager that can work heavily on head. Even 24/7 if needed.
I dont personally think the release managers should nessecarily be committing code ... I think that the release manager should not be a programmer but more someone who knows the project and can manage the programmers. IE the release manager doesnt have to touch CVS really, as long as he can direct others who can. I think there is always a danger (I fell into the trap myself when I was looking after 1.0 and 1.2) that a programmer is tempted to sneak features in. I think now that project has grown as big as it has, we want a manager who can devote themselves to setting goals, checking they are met, communicating with the developers etc. So maybe we are thinking of different roles? Id be thinking of Ineo having huge input into helping set the goals, and doing lots of development.Perhaps doing the QA. Perhaps they have someone who could fulfil the role I was thinking of, or perhaps others were thinking of a more hands on/code writing release manager.
So how could we "use" Joshua ? He answered the question himself :
My primary concern with 2.4 will be Quality Assurance both in existing code and any new code that is committed.
Great, we have a QA manager volunteer. That's what we still lacks.
Let me know your opinion/reactions.
Maybe we could switch it round, Ineo doing QA (the most essential job IMHO if you want to impress clients) Just some thoughts on a wednesday night after spending all day in Koha meetings. Dont take anything to seriously, im just thinking out loud :) Chris
Maybe we could switch it round, Ineo doing QA (the most essential job IMHO if you want to impress clients)
I think this is an excellent idea. I like the idea of trying to involve Ineo in an important position in the open source process, in order to try to help ensure that they will be open contributors and partners. We don't want to get ourselves in a situation like we are with the Argentinian developers, where some great work has been done but we don't have access to it! Involving Ineo as QA Manager would help encourage them to be part of the community. I'm hesitant to have the RM position be filled by someone who hasn't spent some time working with the Koha project. I don't doubt that they're going to make some great contributions, and could really help the Koha Project grow by leaps and bounds. But I'd like for us all to have a chance to get to know them, and for them to get to know us, before we give them a job like Release Manager. Just my $.02. I hope all that came out right... :) -- Owen
Paul POULAIN said:
The result of this trip (apart from meeting in real life stephen, owen & joshua that was really great) was that SAN decided definetly to go with Koha.
Excellent! (I had a felling Yves would make the "right" decision.)
What i'll request is to write what they will add & publish it ASAP. In fact, i/we already have written some pages (in french) about that. Still has to be completed & translated. But should arrive soon.
Good. I think it would be very interesting to see what SAN-Ouest Provence would like to add to Koha. It's quite likely that their "wish list" will have a big impact on the future direction of Koha.
What will Ineo do in this matter ? Ineo, as a large company, will help SAN to go to Koha. So, they will coordinate dev of new features, help them migrating, teach...
Frankly, I am a little nervous about INEO being too deeply involved with Koha too quickly. It is a large company, with lots of resources (it's part of a much, much larger company), but that can be both good and bad. A large company can do a lot to promote Koha. But a large company, if it wants, could easily absorb Koha. Koha is still a small open-source group. INEO's involvement will instantly increase the number of _active_ developers by about 50% (or more). That could be either good or bad. INEO has recently hired a very experienced library automation person (Jean-Pierre) to manage their experiment with Koha. (François-Laurent, please correct me if that is incorrect.) But I think that INEO will want to assess this experiment at some point and decide if they want to continue their involvement with Koha. So once again, I think we might want to proceed with caution as we build a relationship with INEO.
So, the next question is : who, from Joshua or Ineo would be the best RM ?
I think both -- but Joshua first (2.4), then INEO (2.6 -- or even 3.0, if SAN-Ouest Provence proposes some really BIG changes) in about six months. That would give INEO time to become part of the Koha community and get very familiar with the code (and decide if they want to continue with Koha). And perhaps Chris' idea of having INEO do the QA would be a very good way to accomplish that. Stephen -- Stephen Hedges Skemotah Solutions, USA www.skemotah.com -- shedges@skemotah.com
Chris Cormack a écrit :
Hi all
I was having a think the other night, about possible candidates for release manager for 2.4.
Ok, all your arguments are fine to me. I'm sure Joshua will be a good/great release manager. The only difficulty will be for SAN to have an american Release Manager AND a deadline of 2006/01/01. I'll do all what I can to avoid having SAN-code not in main branch, as we have "argentina-code" that is waited since months (and should arrive, but still is not) And I agree our kaitiaki should organise an IRC meeting. As usual, should be planned at something like 8-10PM GMT for european ppl to be able to be here. Possible dates for me are : May 10,11,12,16,19,20,23,24,25,26,27 PS : I'm VERY happy to see some mails on koha-devel & seeing new ideas for next releases. -- Paul POULAIN Consultant indépendant en logiciels libres responsable francophone de koha (SIGB libre http://www.koha-fr.org)
participants (7)
-
Chris Cormack -
Dorian Meid -
Jochen Geiser -
Joshua Ferraro -
Owen Leonard -
Paul POULAIN -
Stephen Hedges