Hi all :)
thanks for your response

I wish we can apply this as soon as possible

and we can try this for the Arabic language my group is ready to work :)

but the Question is , where we will work ? in the same Pootle Server , or that is not available ?

if that is available , I wish you upload the pot and po files to the server
If you want some guidelines you can use this guide it's very useful , and very easy :
http://pwet.fr/man/linux/commandes/xml2po

and I wish to start work with the the 3.8 manual as Nicole  advice :)

Thanks ^_^

Karam


On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com> wrote:
I think the idea of having po files for translating the manual is an interesting idea - because it means that when Nicole updates the manual, not the whole manual will have to be retranslated, but only the changed parts of it. If we keep the image names the same for each language, we could also have "translated" screenshots for each language.

Git allows to see what has changed in the English manual between versions, but those changes are not reflected in the translated manuals.

If someone wants to do a 1:1 translation, using po files make a lot of sense and it would lower the barrier for translating the manuals.

Agreed. This is a fantastic idea. Generating a po file from Docbook (and vice versa) is easy, and for 1:1 translations would be a great help. I think it would be much better to merge the translated Docbook into the git repository prior to releases, the way we do with Koha, rather than asking the translation teams to rewrite the manual every time something is pushed to the English.

Regards,
Jared

--
Jared Camins-Esakov
Bibliographer, C & P Bibliography Services, LLC
(phone) +1 (917) 727-3445