[Koha-bugs] [Bug 6198] Use 001 (not biblionumber) as record identifier for OAI-PMH

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6198

Jane Wagner <jwagner at ptfs.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jwagner at ptfs.com

--- Comment #1 from Jane Wagner <jwagner at ptfs.com> 2011-04-17 14:58:50 UTC ---
I don't think using 001 is necessarily a good idea.  For many US libraries
using OCLC, the 001 is where the OCLC number lives.  That's a sufficiently
large number of databases to have to take into account.  If your setup will
work with the OCLC number, it may not be a problem.  But if it has to be a
unique number to the system/record, it will be.

What about another field?  A lot of libraries also use the 035 for either OCLC
or system-derived numbers (Unicorn especially), so that's probably not a good
one either.

In USMARC (not sure about UNIMARC), the biblionumber is being mapped into the
999c in the default biblioitems Koha to MARC mapping.  Can this be used or
adapted?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA Contact for the bug.