[Koha-bugs] [Bug 7031] More options for AdvancedSearchTypes
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
Wed Dec 28 17:52:26 CET 2011
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7031
Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins at cpbibliography.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jcamins at cpbibliography.com
--- Comment #13 from Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins at cpbibliography.com> 2011-12-28 16:52:26 UTC ---
Katrin,
(In reply to comment #12)
> Created attachment 6938 [details]
> screenshot of advanced search
>
> I tested this and have some questions/notes:
>
> 1) I was searching for a special combination of itemtype A, location B, and
> collection code C. The search turned up a record where no item had this
> combination. There was one item with my itemtype A, while the other item had
> itemtype D, location B, and collection code C.
> Is it possible to make the search more specific here?
Not with GRS-1 indexing. DOM indexing would make it possible.
> 2) Why use phrase for itype, but not for ccode or loc?
> No results match your search with limit(s): 'mc-itype,phr:BK or
> mc-itype,phr:CF or mc-itype,phr:CR mc-ccode:"NFIC" mc-loc:"CART" or
> mc-loc:"CHILD"'.
I'm not sure, but I would think that adding a phrase index and using that would
be preferable here (however, I wouldn't hold up the QA process for it if I were
the one signing off). Of course, while we're using GRS-1 indexing, it probably
doesn't really matter all that much anyway.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
More information about the Koha-bugs
mailing list