[Koha-bugs] [Bug 7140] Add item type description on the catalogue search and detail screens

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
Wed Nov 30 14:20:50 CET 2011


http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7140

M. de Rooy <m.de.rooy at rijksmuseum.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Patch Status|Needs Signoff               |Failed QA

--- Comment #7 from M. de Rooy <m.de.rooy at rijksmuseum.nl> 2011-11-30 13:20:50 UTC ---
Thanks for responding and providing more info.
You are right about the double itemtype. It is not related to your patch; it is
just a strange thing on several places in Koha to show it twice if
noItemTypeImages is set or the imageurl is empty. In my opinion listing it
twice is just a bug. But that is another bug report.

I would like to add to your comment that results depend on the value of pref
item-level_itypes. I have two points on your patch now:

Search Results:
if item-level_itypes==item, then the itemtype (+icon) is already in the column
Location (per item) 
if item-level_itypes==biblio, then the itemtype (+icon) is already in the
column Results
my conclusion would be: itemtype is not needed additionally here (redundant)

Catalogue Details/Items tab: 
if item-level_itypes==biblio, then the item type is listed with the biblio on
top
if item-level_itypes==item, then the item type is listed per item
Your patch apparently does not really change anything here. (But it would catch
the situation mentioned above!) It merely rearranges the tests on
noItemTypeImages and imageurl.
Looking further, I think that the moredetail script (for the Items tab) should
fill imageurl for items, but it does not. The template uses that empty
variable! So it never shows an icon. If you change the code here, please
resolve that bug too.

After those two points, I am wondering if the changes in Search.pm are
necessary. Did not further look into that. Could you explain why they are
necessary?

I agree with you that this is a lot of text for a small patch ;)

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.


More information about the Koha-bugs mailing list