[Koha-bugs] [Bug 7417] Include alternate forms from authorities in bibliographic searches

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7417

--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart at biblibre.com> ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> I don't know, I think Moo is a good candidate for packaging ourselves, and
> using that instead of Moose for Solr, etc. It would be easy enough to do the
> packaging. I just tried it, and unlike when I tried to get Moose to compile,
> it worked without any major hitches.

We can rewrite Koha::SearchEngine::Solr with Moo. But this module use a
Data::SearchEngine::Solr module which use Moose :-/
Then we have to rewrite this external library too to drop the Moose dependency.

> All of which is a bit of a tangent. I would have no objection to rewriting
> Koha::Authority and the RecordProcessor stuff to use Moo, if there is a
> clear reason why it is better than using Class::Accessor.

I never used Moo and just used Moose for the Koha::SearchEngine::Solr. But I
heard many good about it and it seems it is widely used now by Perl programmers
communities.
I am not attached or a fervent defender of any of them. However I'm convinced
that Koha should have a powerfull and adapted object system.
We want to write less code as possible then we have to choose a system with a
minimum of code verbosity.
In fact I think it will be difficult to have a consensus but all propositions
must be considered in order to choose the most pertinent.

My 1st comment there was not to troll or to impose my choices. I just gave my
opinion about introducing a new auth class without rules

However if each one of us keeps waiting for others not decision will be taken
:-/

That is why I think that it would be worth having this discussion in a special
topic in the koha-devel mailing list.

Then everybody will participate and share about the subject, and then maybe we
could reach a global consensus in agreement with the whole community (Maybe we
should wait for the end of summer to launch such a discussion, as many people
are currently on vacation :)).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.