[Koha-bugs] [Bug 2500] Standing enhancement request for adding/updating call number splitting algorithms in C4/Labels.pm

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=2500

--- Comment #14 from Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger at foundations.edu> 2012-02-26 01:25:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > (In reply to comment #10)
> > > Comment on attachment 3298 [details]
> > > Split LCCN on "segmentation" markers: '/'
> > > 
> > > LCCNs do not have segmentation markers. The example is for DDC, and the feature
> > > is already implemented for that classification.
> > 
> > IIRC this was specifically added at the request of someone on the mailing list.
> > See
> > http://koha.1045719.n5.nabble.com/Split-Call-Numbers-Variation-td3556413.html#a3621392
> > 
> > From this statement:
> > 
> > "That's kind of surprising, I have been playing around a bit on my test box and
> > for me Library of Congress numbers never seem to get split. They usually come
> > in this format: 917.1/0022/2 which always shows up on my labels as 917.100222
> > and that is obviously too long." in one of the posts, it appears that at least
> > one person does get LCCN numbers with a '/' as a segmentation marker.
> 
> Ah, I assumed it was a typo for ddcn that wasn't applied because the issue was
> identified as user error, since the example given is a DDC call number not an
> LC call number. Sorry about that.

Sorry. As you can see, I took what was requested and added it assuming the
requester knew what he/she was talking about. I'm by no means a call number
expert. :-) If this is not a valid LCCN, then feel free to correct and/or
obsolete.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.