[Koha-bugs] [Bug 8958] Facets are not fully UNIMARC compliant

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8958

Frédéric Demians <frederic at tamil.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |7421

--- Comment #2 from Frédéric Demians <frederic at tamil.fr> ---
Very welcomed patch. Bug 3216 was implying such a follow-up patch, for
UNIMARC, and for MARC21 (someone intersted?)

In my opinion, you should propose first a patch fixing issues, and then
propose a patch enhencing facets.

> - The "Place" Facet cannot show up because it is mapped on 651 field
> instead of 607 field.

Yes.

> - Some fields are missing in Unimarc facets (topics : 608, 616 ; authors :
> 710, 711, 712, 716, 720, 721, 722).

Check that new fields added to topic facets are searcheable. Since they
are multi-part facets (coming from several subfields), biblio DOM
indexing may be required. Improving facets, we can reach a point where
deprecated GRS-1 indexing may be necessary.

Why not a new facet for Corporate Name? Is it a good idea to mix
Personal/Corporate Name?

> - Serials are mapped on 225a. This field is subject to many variants
> ("Collection Que sais-je?", "Que sais-je", "Que sais je?", etc). Facets
> would be nicer if we used 410t.

Disputable for libraries not using 410 field but only 225.

> Some other fields could be better indexed : 600ab (name/surname)
> instead of 600a, 601abcdef (hierarchical collectivity or congress)
> instead of 601a, 604at (author+title) instead of 604a

It's not a matter of indexing but of facets building, even if it's
related to the ability to use Koha indexes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.