[Koha-bugs] [Bug 7417] Include alternate forms from authorities in bibliographic searches

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7417

Frédéric Demians <frederic at tamil.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |frederic at tamil.fr

--- Comment #41 from Frédéric Demians <frederic at tamil.fr> ---
Jared, this is a great and welcome initiative! Like Johnathan, I would
have preferred another OO framework (Moose), but well... too early.

In _processrecord, I can see you populate biblio record with see also
forms, and you add 'z' as field first indicator, in order to
distinguish, I suppose, authorized form and see also forms. Is it you
own convention, or is it a norm?

Are you sure nothing must be modified in UNIMARC XSL? You've edited
MARC21 XSL in order to avoid displaying see also forms for authors, for
example: 

<xsl:for-each select="marc:datafield[(@tag=100 or @tag=700) and @ind1!='z']">

Doesn't it mean that for UNIMARC, see also author forms will be
displayed alongside with authorized form?

And what about subjects? Are subjects see also forms displayed after
authorized forms? It may be the case for 650 fields. Some libraries will
want that, others won't.

Otherwise, do you have any plan/idea to add other forms than see also?
rejected forms, broader terms, narrower terms?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.