[Koha-bugs] [Bug 10187] precision needed in serials-collection.tt (1/quarter)

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
Thu Jul 18 09:13:59 CEST 2013


http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10187

David Cook <dcook at prosentient.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dcook at prosentient.com.au

--- Comment #4 from David Cook <dcook at prosentient.com.au> ---
(In reply to M. de Rooy from comment #3)
> Would it be more clear to make the scope of this report little bit wider?
> 
> 1/season (spring, summer, etc.) [do not mention quarter anymore]
> 1/quarter (three months) [if quarter is harder, we could also eliminate it]
> 
> BTW I am curious: Why not let every 3 months just cover both?
> 
> Extending this report with:
> 1/week= weekly
> 1/month = monthly
> 1/2 weeks is not completely clear (0,5 or 2?): 1/two weeks
> idem: 1/three weeks, 1/two three four months, 1/two years
> BTW: What do you think of every instead of 1/
> So: every 2 weeks, every 3 months etc.
> 
> each year or annually instead of 1/year
> 2/year: every 6 months, semiannual (?)
> 2/day= twice a day
> 
> Another step: We could also just say the frequency is two weeks etc. instead
> of prefix 75% of the list with 'every'.
> So list: daily, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, .., 4 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2
> years
> 
> What do you think?

I might be wrong, but I think it might be important to have separate
periodicities, as they might be linked to different number patterns/formulas?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


More information about the Koha-bugs mailing list