[Koha-bugs] [Bug 10335] UNIMARC authorities search doesn't display properly information on parallel form
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
Sun May 26 13:02:40 CEST 2013
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10335
mathieu saby <mathieu.saby at univ-rennes2.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mathieu.saby at univ-rennes2.f
| |r
--- Comment #2 from mathieu saby <mathieu.saby at univ-rennes2.fr> ---
Hello Janusz
Good idea, but I would like to make some comments before testing :
The $8 contains the code for a language, not for a kind of script. Scripts
codes are stored in $7, on 2 characters (interesting info = position 4-5)
ba latin
ca cyrillic
fa arabe
ga grec
ha hébreu
etc.
The $8 subfield (not mandatory) can be used in 7XX, but also in 2XX or 4XX.
So, you can have a field coded in case of romanized record, you can have 2
repeated fields, with the same $8, but different $7.
That's the way we work in France. I hope it is not wrong...
Ex from unimarc manual :
200 #1 $7ba0yba0a $8engrus $aGlinka,$bMihail Ivanovič
200 #1 $7ba0yca0y $8engrus $aГлинка,$bМихайл Иванович
The $7 is mandatory in case of double script records, but the $8 is not
mandatory.
The possible codes in $7 are limited (a dozen), but ALL 639-2 iso codes can be
used in $8. So I wonder if managing them in the templates is a good solution.
So, could you tell me if your patch deals only with 7XX fields ?
M. Saby
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
More information about the Koha-bugs
mailing list