[Koha-bugs] [Bug 10335] UNIMARC authorities search doesn't display properly information on parallel form

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
Sun May 26 13:02:40 CEST 2013


http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10335

mathieu saby <mathieu.saby at univ-rennes2.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mathieu.saby at univ-rennes2.f
                   |                            |r

--- Comment #2 from mathieu saby <mathieu.saby at univ-rennes2.fr> ---
Hello Janusz
Good idea, but I would like to make some comments before testing : 

The $8 contains the code for a language, not for a kind of script. Scripts
codes are stored  in $7, on 2 characters (interesting info = position 4-5)
ba     latin
ca     cyrillic
fa     arabe
ga     grec
ha     hébreu
etc.

The $8 subfield (not mandatory) can be used in 7XX, but also in 2XX or 4XX.

So, you can have a field coded in case of romanized record, you can have 2
repeated fields, with the same $8, but different $7.

That's the way we work in France. I hope it is not wrong...

Ex from unimarc manual : 
200 #1 $7ba0yba0a $8engrus $aGlinka,$bMihail Ivanovič
200 #1 $7ba0yca0y $8engrus $aГлинка,$bМихайл Иванович

The $7 is mandatory in case of double script records, but the $8 is not
mandatory.

The possible codes in $7 are limited (a dozen), but ALL 639-2 iso codes can be
used in $8. So I wonder if managing them in the templates is a good solution.

So, could you tell me if your patch deals only with 7XX fields ?

M. Saby

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


More information about the Koha-bugs mailing list