[Koha-bugs] [Bug 9180] Default rules are not always used for overdues

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9180

Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer at bsz-bw.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Signed Off                  |Failed QA

--- Comment #18 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer at bsz-bw.de> ---
Hi Sophie,

I have tested this twice, but I think there is still a bug/regression in this:

Test user from library A has checked out
- various books from library A and B in A
- books from libary B in B

./misc/cronjobs/overdue_notices.pl -t -v

Tests: Overdue notice triggers
1) only defined for default/all libraries
  - with and without patch: 2 notices are generated.
    Both generated notices contain a complete list of overdue items
    from both branches.
2) defined for default/all libraries and library C
  - without patch: no notice is generated
  - with patch: 2 notices are generated.
3) defined for default/all libraries and library A
  - without patch: only a notice for library A is generated
  - with patch: 2 notices are generated.
4) only defined for library A
  - with and without patch: only 1 notice is generated for library A
5) defined for library A and B, no default rule
  - without patch: 2 messages are generated
  - with patch: only 1 message is generated

For this bug: 2) seems ok with the patch, but we seem to introduce a regression
on 5).

In general: Should the item lists be identical for the patches? I think it
would only make sense if each overdue notice contained a complementary list of
items. But should they be divided by checkout library/homebranch? Should it be
controlled by one of the existing preferences (CircControl or
HomeOrHoldingBranch)?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.