[Koha-bugs] [Bug 13019] Add base classes on which to build Koha objects

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13019

Kyle M Hall <kyle at bywatersolutions.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|In Discussion               |Passed QA

--- Comment #52 from Kyle M Hall <kyle at bywatersolutions.com> ---
I agree with Jonathan. This has been discussed in great detail. This *has* been
a team effort with much input from Jonathan and Martin. This is also the third
iteration of this idea that I've proposed. It would be great if we could get
input from every single person, but there will always be opposing opinions on
how things should be done. At this point, I ( and probably others ) just want
something, anything, we can get and use. This does not by any means prevent us
from making improvements in the future! But we need to start somewhere.

(In reply to David Cook from comment #51)
> (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #50)
> > I personally don't want to discuss this implementation for the following
> > reasons:
> > 1/ We already have discussed (or at least tried) for years.
> > 2/ We already have different proposals (At least from Kyle, Yohann and me).
> > 3/ This code is functional and we will able to improve it according to our
> > further needs.
> > 4/ Everybody knows that putting a bug report to the 'in discussion' status
> > without any other actions (mail on mailing list, discussion on #koha, etc)
> > don't permit to move it forward.
> > 
> > I strongly believe that the next step is to get the RM point of view.
> > 
> > You can provide a patch on another report to improve the code and show us
> > what could be better, that would be great :)
> 
> Fair enough. Maybe the next step is to get the RM point of view.
> 
> While I do have ideas for what I think would be better code and a better
> proposal, I think it would need to be a more concerted team effort 
> (admittedly, that has historically been extraordinarily difficult to
> achieve). As for individual work, I'm not willing to dedicate the time in my
> personal life at the moment, and I don't have the time to do it
> professionally, so I suppose it's not fair for me to be too critical if I
> can't provide any work myself.
> 
> Feel free to switch it back to Passed QA.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.