[Koha-bugs] [Bug 8007] Discharge management

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8007

--- Comment #44 from Galen Charlton <gmcharlt at gmail.com> ---
Jonathan: first, let me thank you for engaging with DBIC.

(In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #43)
> (In reply to Chris Cormack from comment #41)
> > I have to say, I am really not a fan of the ::DataObject:: and ::Service::
> > idea. I may be overruled on that I guess. I'd prefer a Discharge class I
> > think.
> 
> I believe in our developer discussions at KohaCon13 the basic consensus was
> that the DataObject layer was not needed and was just over-complicating
> everything and adding unnecessary overhead ( it was only in our initial
> designs to join biblio and biblioitems virtually ).

I agree.  There are *some* specific cases, most notably bibs, where an
intermediate class might be useful to deal with legacy defects in the current
data model, and some cases where complicated business logic suggests a
container class, but I am not in favor of creating DataObject classes or the
like automatically.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.