[Koha-bugs] [Bug 8007] Discharge management

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8007

--- Comment #45 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart at biblibre.com> ---
Thanks all 3 of you for your looks! 

The idea of Service and DataObject was to separate methods for a discharge
object from others routines which are not directly linked to the object
("Manager").

Don't you think if we put all the code in a Koha::Discharge package we will get
back to a new Koha namespace with big files where responsibilities are not
enough separated?

What is the problem with having a simple business object? I don't understand
where the complexity is added, to me it is simplified. Should I put all
methods/routines from Service::Discharge and DataObject::Discharge to
Koha::Discharge?

I personally think we should not call Koha::Database in pl files, do we agree
with that?

If you think it is not the way to do, where can I find a RFC / consensus on how
developers should develop using oop into Koha?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.