[Koha-bugs] [Bug 11202] Improve UNIMARC biblio indexing

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11202

--- Comment #54 from mathieu saby <mathsabypro at gmail.com> ---
> 
> 1) In general I am having problems with pubdate and acqdate searches in
> UNIMARC compared to their MARC21 equivalents Mathieu, could you please take
> a look? Syntaxes I tried:
>   pubdate=yyyy, pubdate:yyyy
>   With QueryParser: pubdate(yyyy), acqdate(yyyy)


I will take a look


> 3) In general I am a bit worried about removing indexes. I can see, why
>    some subfields are not making much sense to index, I also have read
>    the comments on bug 11119, but some of the  changes might be debatable. 
>    For example the following change could break functionality some 
>    libraries rely on. Maybe it would not hurt to keep those around?
>     
> -#FIXME Fields 603, 630, 631, 632, 633, 634, 635, 636, 646 are not defined
> in Unimarc, but may be used by some libraries.

I don't know who added these indexes and why, but they were never used in
Unimarc, so it was clearly a mistake to put them in standard configuration
files.
Maybe some french library made one day a very specific developpment using these
fields (I'm thinking of Frantiq network, specialised in Archeology). Or maybe
it is just a mistake... I will send a message to french list to warn everybody
that if a library want to index those fields in 3.14 they need to edit the
config files before reindexing.

Mathieu

Mathieu

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.