[Koha-bugs] [Bug 11395] Batch modifications for records

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11395

Paola Rossi <paola.rossi at cineca.it> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Needs Signoff               |Failed QA
                 CC|                            |paola.rossi at cineca.it

--- Comment #33 from Paola Rossi <paola.rossi at cineca.it> ---
Today I've tried to test the patches against master 3.17.00.009

I've applied:
5 patches of 11319,
3 patches of 11914,
and the 8 patches of the current 11395.

I've found three errors.

1) ERROR on MARC modification templates: unavailable "Every" option:

I've edited this action:
Copy field 650$x to 650$y if 650$x matches RegEx m/ ^second 650 / 

Then I've changed all the 650-s into 750-s. I see "All" becoming "Every" (I
have not understood why it has happened). I've saved, and I've editing the
action again: now "All" is shown.
I've not been able to set "Every" option. 
I think that showing "Every" is an error, or there's a lack in managing that
option (see C) below).

So I've passed the patch to "Failed QA" status.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2) On Batch record modification [and on cart Action Modify too], I've cleared
all the listed records.
I've selected "Modify the selected records". Instead of "No record was
selected", the program has started, and then has ended showing:
"All records have successfully been modified! ".

--------------------------------------------------------------------
3) ERROR on batch_record_modification.pl [I've checked only "Preview MARC"]:
case of repeteable subfield [x] in repeteable fields [650]:

My biblio record had 3 fields 650, each one had 3 $x:
650  0 ......
       _x1-650 x 1 Digital techniques 1
       _xfirst 650, second $x
       _x1-650 x 3 Digital techniques 3
650  0 ........
       _x2-650 x 1 Digital techniques 1
       _xsecond 650, second $x
       _x2-650 x 3 Digital techniques 3
650  0 ......
       _x3-650 x 1 Digital techniques 1
       _xthird 650, second $x
       _x3-650 x 3 Digital techniques 3

I wanted to delete only the second occurrence of $x, only in the second
occurrence of 650 field. So my action was:
(A) Delete field 650$x if 650$x matches RegEx m/ ^second 650 / 

On preview MARC the result is not what I wanted, but:
650  0 ...
       _x1-650 x 1 Digital techniques 1
       _xfirst 650, second $x
       _x1-650 x 3 Digital techniques 3
650  0 ....
650  0 ....
       _x3-650 x 1 Digital techniques 1
       _xthird 650, second $x
       _x3-650 x 3 Digital techniques 3

Then I've tried another action, selecting the "first" option:
B) Delete 1st field 650$x if 650$x matches RegEx m/ ^second 650 / 
but the result remained the same as for "All" (A).

Neither the 2 negative forms gave me what I wanted:
C) Delete field 650$x unless 650$x does not match RegEx m/ ^second 650 /
D) Delete 1st field 650$x unless 650$x does not match RegEx m/ ^second 650 /

Similar behaviours occurred in Copy, Update and Move cases.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.