[Koha-bugs] [Bug 13040] Improve exporter to allow multiple branch selections

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13040

Paola Rossi <paola.rossi at cineca.it> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Needs Signoff               |Failed QA

--- Comment #5 from Paola Rossi <paola.rossi at cineca.it> ---
Thanks, Robin Sheat, for the answer in comment 3. I've made some further tests.
I agree with you: the problem is the same on MASTER.
And the error managed by Bug 12860 happens when the MARC field XXX occurs at
least in one of the records selected for the export. Otherwise, no abort
occurs.

Today I've applied the patch against master 3.17.00.030.
I've found the following problems.

1) I selected no branch [so all branches were selected]. Then I've selected a
value for the two input fields:
>From item call number
To item call number

Koha has answered only about the current selected library, not about all the
libraries as required.

2) > By default all branches will be selected.
No, the default was the current selected library (that I could uncheck,
anyway).

3) There were some records biblio in my DB, all the biblios had at least one
item. Exporting all records [no branch checked, item type ALL, the other input
fields empty] was OK. Then I catalogued a new biblio record [Default framework]
without items. And then I edited an old item changing the barcode, inventory
and something else. 
Exporting in the same way as above, not all the records were exported, but only
some of them: in particular, the biblio record of the changed item was not
exported.
[I went back to master on the same DB. Exporting [ALL Library selected, item
type ALL, the other input fields empty], all the records were exported: the
biblio record without items too, as well as the biblio record whose item I
changed.]

So I pass the patch to "Failed QA" status.

NB-1. On the template of export, "Accession date" is shown, but the field is
shown as the item's "d - Date acquired" on CAT.
NB-2. If I didn't selected "From biblio number" and "To biblio number", in some
cases the export file is not sorted on biblio number. This seemed strange to
me: the sort of the export file could be an important information for me, but I
didn't recognize what it was.
NB-3. If no record was selected, an output file was created, empty. Perhaps the
answer could be given to the user in intranet.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.