[Koha-bugs] [Bug 13157] New: improving facet definitions for unimarc

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13157

            Bug ID: 13157
           Summary: improving facet definitions for unimarc
 Change sponsored?: ---
           Product: Koha
           Version: master
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P5 - low
         Component: Searching
          Assignee: gmcharlt at gmail.com
          Reporter: mathsabypro at gmail.com
        QA Contact: testopia at bugs.koha-community.org

The new code for facets calculation could probably be more precise for unimarc
(in biblio-koha-indexdefs.xml)


- for series, 410 tag is probably better than 225
- the date and place subdivisions 6XX$y and 6XX$z could be indexed (in su-geo
and su-chrono)
- the subdivisionn $x is indexed for 606, but all 6XX$x could also be indexed
(in su-to)
- 5XX are not subjects, so I'm not sure that indexing them in su-ut is good
(but we should check in ccl.properties how this index is defined). Anyway, I
always found that indexing 5XX was a weird idea...


and there is maybe a mistake for 995$b - holdingbranch (should be 995$c)

M. Saby

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.