[Koha-bugs] [Bug 12412] Add ability for plugins to convert arbitrary files to MARC from record staging tool

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12412

Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Pushed to Master            |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #16 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Pete Edwards from comment #15)
> (In reply to Pete Edwards from comment #14)
> > This is a really useful facility and I am using it import directly from
> > Excel spreadsheets (XLS binary format). There is a problem if I try and
> > re-import the same file. I get the impression that the import tries to
> > reload the staged file but in this case it doesn't include the
> > transformation step so I get an error:
> > 
> > stage-marc-import.pl: binmode() on closed filehandle STDOUT at
> > /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Templates.pm line 120., referer:
> > http://library-intra.edwards4.co.uk/cgi-bin/koha/tools/stage-marc-import.pl
> > stage-marc-import.pl: Filehandle STDOUT reopened as FH only for input at
> > /usr/lib/perl5/Template/Provider.pm line 964., referer:
> > http://library-intra.edwards4.co.uk/cgi-bin/koha/tools/stage-marc-import.pl
> > 
> > Have I understood the issue correctly and does the staging facility need to
> > remember the transformation too?
> 
> Sorry - this was a red herring. I had another error in my plugin meaning I
> couldn't load the file. However, I still get the following error from
> somewhere when I import a file:
> stage-marc-import.pl: binmode() on closed filehandle STDOUT at
> /usr/share/koha/lib/C4/Templates.pm line 120
> I don't know what causes this. Has anyone seen similar?

I think you should either:

1) send an email to the devel list
2) fill a bug for what you are seeing, and check with the devs taking care of
it.

You should probably do (1) and then (depending on the results) do (2).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.