[Koha-bugs] [Bug 14198] RDA: Indexing 264 field (Zebra)

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
Tue Jun 2 04:19:49 CEST 2015


http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14198

--- Comment #8 from Héctor Eduardo Castro Avalos <hector.hecaxmmx at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #7)

Hi Katrin,

> 
> Thx! Sorry for causing you more work. :(
> 
No problem, you've got right and that's your work. You see things that I
haven't seen before. I really appreciate your help on this.

> One more thought looking at this a bit more awake: Currently the new and the
> old indexes look as they will be mostly identical - they both index 260 and
> 264. I see the note about the Provider index being based on a suggestion
> from LOC, so that makes sense to me. But do we really need the other 2 new
> indexes Provider-place and Provider-date? Should we make them different or
> maybe just map them as an alias in ccl.properties to the existing indexes?

I think that we don't need the two new indexes. I just include them here
because make sense with counterpart 260 field, even though both indexes don't
exist and they are not in any suggestion or standard, i.e., I have included
them here to map at the same as 260 field and find the same results. They work
as an alias of the indexes pl and copydate. If you prefer I will remove both.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


More information about the Koha-bugs mailing list