[Koha-bugs] [Bug 13383] RDA: 100/110/111 changes to XSLT

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13383

--- Comment #6 from rgravel at marlboro.edu ---
Thanks for catching that, Winona! I think this should be included in the fix,
as it was just overlooked and is the equivalent of the $e in the 100/110s.


(In reply to Winona Salesky from comment #5)
> Also, while working on this I noticed that the relator code for field 111 is
> actually subfield j, should I add that change into this fix as well? This is
> not handled by the current version of the stylesheet. 
> Thanks, 
> -Winona
> 
> 
> (In reply to Winona Salesky from comment #4)
> > Should there be a separator? Or should each be on their own line? 
> > -Winona
> > 
> > (In reply to rgravel from comment #3)
> > > I agree with Katrin about the $4 and $e conflict- always favor the term over
> > > the code, as that is what patrons will more readily understand. 
> > > 
> > > I also still like the vertical bar as a separator for the reasons I
> > > mentioned in Bug 13382.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.