[Koha-bugs] [Bug 10459] borrowers should have a timestamp

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
Thu Apr 28 13:08:07 CEST 2016


https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10459

Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy at rijksmuseum.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Signed Off                  |In Discussion

--- Comment #32 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy at rijksmuseum.nl> ---
(In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #31)
> I really dislike having a field name being the same as a mysql data type. I
> think it introduces ambiguity. Would you or anyone else be opposed to naming
> it "updated_on"?

Have a look the discussion from some time ago.
I introduced bortimestamp (an ugly but unique name so no ambiguous column
problems), but the majority pressed me back to use timestamp and first
resolving possible clashes in joins here and there..

Moving this back to In Discussion

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


More information about the Koha-bugs mailing list