[Koha-bugs] [Bug 17621] API: Should the 'update_on' Patron field really be a datetime?

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
Mon Nov 14 08:44:35 CET 2016


https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17621

Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy at rijksmuseum.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |m.de.rooy at rijksmuseum.nl

--- Comment #1 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy at rijksmuseum.nl> ---
(In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #0)
> Bug #17607 highlighted that all other date fields in the Patron response are
> simply 'date', whereas update_on is a date-time (without a timezone).
> 
> We should assess whether it's actually necessary for the update_on field to
> record the timestamp as opposed to just a date, and if it required we should
> ensure we record and return the timezone detail along with it.

We already have quite a number of datetime fields in Koha, but until now we
apparently did not care much about the timezones. What would make this a
different one?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
You are the assignee for the bug.


More information about the Koha-bugs mailing list