[Koha-bugs] [Bug 15851] "Analytics: Show analytics" showing regardless of whether they have analytics.

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15851

--- Comment #13 from Hugo Agud <hagud at orex.es> ---
At the what we need is to know if a bib record has analytics, we do not need
silly xslt links based on bib-leve:s (journals) and on the other hand we have
forgotten about chapters not only serial (bib-level:b)

The link between bib and analytics is 773 field... here the big issue is most
of fields are text 773$t and the one to one link are 773$0 773$9 or even
773$x(issn (journals) or 773$w(controlnumber) depends on every library, how
they have created the analytics...they will have more or less filled tags

If you're using koha and have created the analytics with koha you will have a
nice 773 to work create links ;)

Now in the staff cients, in the analytics tab you have info about if that item
has anaytics attached and how many... because the 773$9 (one to one link and it
works fine)

I think there is not a 100% solution, because there will be plenty of different
situations and one solution won't match all possible situations

I like the idea of the syspref 'GetAnalyticsCount' but we must be clear enought
with the customers explaining how the links works

The idea it should be, that the library must  check their current 773 tags and
fix it. (they have a nice batch record modification tool)

There is 3 potential ways:
for current biblionumber --> appear the link if there is any 773$0 that matchs
the biblio
or

for current itemnumbers --> appear a link if there is any 773$9 that matchs the
itemnumber

or
for current issn --> apprear a link if there is any 773$x that matches 022$a

I don not like the control-number:
the use of control number I dislike because koha is not using 001
control-number

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.