[Koha-bugs] [Bug 19826] Introduce Koha::Acquisition::Budget(s) and Koha::Acquisition:: Fund(s)

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19826

--- Comment #24 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomascohen at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #21)
> (In reply to Julian Maurice from comment #18)
> > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #15)
> > > Hum, so Koha::Acquisition::Vendor::Basket::Order? :)
> > 
> > Please, no :)
> > Not everything can be represented in a tree.
> > Where do you place basket groups in this hierarchy ? It could be
> > Koha::Acq::Vendor::Basketgroup::Basket, but not every basket belongs to a
> > basketgroup.
> > Also, there is a 1-n relationship between biblio and aqorders, but
> > Koha::Biblio::Orders does not make much sense IMHO.
> > 
> > If there was a vote, I'd vote for everything on one level
> 
> Not everything, but I would prefer Koha::Acq::Budget[s] and
> Koha::Acq::fund[s] too.
> Setting to In Discussion to get more opinions.

I don't really care, really. I've moved Fund(s).pm one level up, and marked PQA
so Matthias can code the funds endpoint on top of this. Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.