[Koha-bugs] [Bug 17519] Item editor handles clearing dateaccessioned and replacementpricedate inconsistently

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org]

https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17519

Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy at rijksmuseum.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|In Discussion               |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #16 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy at rijksmuseum.nl> ---
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #15)
> Actually no - I just didn't have the time to write another answer.
> 
> I think this patch makes the behaviour inconsistent. If you can empty out on
> editing, but not on adding the item -  that will look like a bug. 
> 
> The behaviour right now is consistent as the field is forced to be mandatory
> and as I said, we rely on this in some contexts - for example in context of
> inventory books.
> 
> Maybe we should discuss use cases first?
> 
> Things that come to my mind:
> - new books list
> - inventory book (electronical, sometimes printed out)
> - sorting by accession date in the OPAC
> - weeding reports/workflows

OK. The current behavior is not really consistent (if you compare with the
other date). But in view of its low importance, I would rather close this
report now if it disturbs other users too much.. No problem!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.