[Koha-bugs] [Bug 20271] Merge deleted biblio, biblioitems, biblio_metadata, and items tables

bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org bugzilla-daemon at bugs.koha-community.org
Thu Apr 23 11:23:41 CEST 2020


https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20271

--- Comment #216 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart at bugs.koha-community.org> ---
(In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #212)
> Nice work everyone! I've been looking at the code and so far would like to
> mention:
> - I would prefer 'archived' instead of 'deleted' in the chosen terminology.
> And reserve 'delete' for permanent deletion.

There is deleted_on and is_current (comment 198 and later for the discussion).

> - I'd suggest we split this bug into separate ones for each case to ease
> testing and have more people onboard. I know it might be frustrating to read
> this, but I think it is the best.

There is 2 years history in those commits, splitting them will break everything
and add lot of work. I won't do that. I can help to push this one until the
finish line but as it.

> - In light of the work on the *reserves tables that was announced today, I'd
> suggest we review the column names (this could be done in a follow-up bug,
> but worth thinking about.

That's definitely something different.

> - With the same spirit as the above comment, having views for the 'old
> tables' might be a good idea.

For the reports then you mean?
I would personally prefer to add a warning in the report table if the deleted
tables are used, but we could add a view.
Adding views mean that we will keep them forever? If yes it will add work to
maintain them, otherwise when are we going to remove them? Like 1 year after? 2
years?

> - Can we merge biblio and biblioitems here?

Definitely out of the scope.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


More information about the Koha-bugs mailing list