[Koha-devel] Moving to Arch?

[MJ Ray]

On 2004-09-23 14:06:18 +0100 Paul POULAIN <paul.poulain at free.fr> wrote:

> If i'm right, then don't you think it's a big task for the release 
> manager ? 

No. I think it's an essential tool for the release manager, to know 
what has finally gone into the release. This was part of the motive 
for taking 2.0 out of CVS to stabilise it.

> I find nice to have "cvs update" to get all developpers code, and, 
> with the 
> help of the cvs-mailing list, see what has been commited.
> Isn't there a way to reproduce CVS behaviour for this : the commit is 
> transmitted automatically to the release manager (& other local 
> copies)

You can have logs emailed to a list and you can have an archive that 
automatically merges selected developer's work. I think this is an 
automatic approximation to the "Linus and lieutenants" way of working 
that used to be used for the kernel. Good for development, but maybe 
not so good for stabilisation.

-- 
MJR/slef    My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
  Creative copyleft computing - http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
LinuxExpo.org.uk village 6+7 Oct http://www.affs.org.uk