[Koha-devel] Building zebradb

[Joshua Ferraro]

Tumer,

Sebastian's been good enough to respond to your post (I forwarded
this to the koha-zebra list). If you get a change, could you join
koha-zebra (if you're not already on it) and follow up -- I've a 
feeling it could prove to be a very productive thread.

Cheers,

Joshua

----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Hammer <quinn at indexdata.com> -----


Hi Joshua,

Thanks for this feedback, it's very interesting. Clearly some of the 
issues you describe (i.e. a lack of stability around upadets) indicate 
software problems, but there's also some interesting ideas for possible 
refinements or new developments which I think would be really useful to 
get into the general development plans for the software... there are 
more folks at ID involved in Zebra development that I'd like to get into 
these thoughts... I dunno if a wiki or just a larger zebra-dev list is 
in order, but it's something to think about.

Joshua Ferraro wrote:

>----- Forwarded message from Tümer Garip <tgarip at neu.edu.tr> -----
>
>
>Hi,
>We have now put the zebra into production level systems. So here is some
>experience to share.
>
>Building the zebra database from single records is a veeeeery looong
>process. (100K records 150k items)
> 
>
Yes, that confirms my expectations. We could think about building  some 
kind of buffering into for first-time updating, or else the logic has to 
be in the application, as you've seen... the situation is particularly 
grim if shadow-indexing is enabled during indexing and every record is 
committed, since this causes a sync of the disks, which could take up to 
a whole second.

Also, I'm not sure which version of Zebra you're using? I've been foing 
some performance-testing of Zebra for the Internet Archive, and noted 
quite a difference between 1.3 and 1.4 (the CVS version) which is really 
where all the development happens.

>Best method we found:
>
>1- Change zebra.cfg file to include
>
>iso2079.recordType:grs.marcxml.collection
>recordType:grs.xml.collection
>
>2- Write (or hack export.pl) to export all the marc records as one big
>chunk to the correct directory with an extension .iso2079 And system
>call "zebraidx -g iso2079 -d <dbnamehere> update records -n".
>
>This ensures that zebra knows its reading marc records rather than xml
>and builds 100K+ records in zooming speed.
>Your zoom module always uses the grs.xml filter while you can anytime
>update or reindex any big chunk of the database as long as you have marc
>records.
> 
>
Good strategy, I think.. but of course it's weird and awkward to have to 
use two different formats, especially when they both have limitations. 
We really must look into handling ISO2709 from ZOOM.

Mind you, version 1.4 should be able to read multiple collection-wrapped 
MARCXML records in one file, but only (AFAIK) in conjunction witht the 
new XSLT-based index rules. I *would* like to try to develop a good way 
to work with bibliographic data in that framework.

>3-We are still using the old API so we read the xml and use
>MARC::Record->new_from_xml( $xmldata )
>A note here that we did not had to upgrade MARC::Record or MARC::Charset
>at all. Any marc created within KOHA is UTF8 and any marc imported into
>KOHA (old marc_subfield_tables) was correctly decoded to utf8 with
>char_decode of biblio.
> 
>
Why not ask for the records in ISO2709 from Zebra if that's what you 
want to work with (when records are loaded in MARCXML, it can spit out 
either 2709 or XML)? Or is it just that you want to have them in 
MARC::Record? At any rate, ISO2709 is a more compact exchange format, so 
it seems to make sense to use it.

>4- We modified circ2.pm and items table to have item onloan field and
>mapped it to marc holdings data. Now our opac search do not call mysql
>but for the branchname.
>
>5- Average updates per day is about 2000 (circulation+cataloger). I can
>say that the speed of the zoom search which slows down during a commit
>operation is acceptable considering the speed gain we have on the
>search.
> 
>
Again, I'd be keen to know which Zebra version you're running?

Beause the Internet Archive will be doing similar point-updates for 
records (only a *lot* more often than 2000 times per day) I have been 
looking a lot at the update speed for these small changes that only 
affect a single term in a record (like a circulation code).. In my test 
database of 150K records, 10K average size, I get update times around 
.5-.7 seconds, which just seems intuitively faster than it should have 
to be. I'm going to nudge the coders to see if we can possibly do this 
better.

>6- Zebra behaves very well with searches but is very tempremental with
>updates. A queue of updates sometimes crashes the zebraserver. When the
>database crash we can not save anything even though we are using shadow
>files. I'll be reporting on this issue once we can isolate the problems.
> 
>
Now *that* is nasty. Do you have *any* way of consistently recreating 
the problem? Even if you don't, I'm sure Adam and the Zebra crew would 
like to see some stack traces of those crashes!!

--Sebastian

>Regards,
>Tumer
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Koha-devel mailing list
>Koha-devel at nongnu.org
>http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
>
>----- End forwarded message -----
>
> 
>

-- 
Sebastian Hammer, Index Data
quinn at indexdata.com   www.indexdata.com
Ph: (603) 209-6853



----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Joshua Ferraro               VENDOR SERVICES FOR OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE
President, Technology       migration, training, maintenance, support
LibLime                                Featuring Koha Open-Source ILS
jmf at liblime.com |Full Demos at http://liblime.com/koha |1(888)KohaILS