[Koha-devel] Guidelines for Patch Acceptance/Rejection

LAURENT Henri-Damien henridamien.laurent at biblibre.com
Sun Nov 14 20:41:13 CET 2010


Le 11/11/2010 04:07, Chris Cormack a écrit :
>> Question for Mr. 3.4 RM:
>>
> :)
> 
>> Is the procedure for dealing with DB revision numbers still the same? As far
>> as I remember from the 3.2 development days, the procedure was to patch
>> kohastructure.sql (or sysprefs.sql, or whatever), then add the update to the
>> end of updatedatabase.pl with a generic version number, like 3.01.00.XXX.
>> Patching kohastructure.pl was left to the RM when they applied the patch.
> 
> Patching kohaversion.pl you mean?
>>
>> I had a crazy table on the wiki for a bit, but this seemed to work better.
>>
>> That still the consensus?
>>
> Yup that is the current practice.
> 
> If we do implement DBIx::Class::Schema and
> DBIx::Class::Schema::Versioned, updatedatabase.pl and kohastructure.pl
> might both go away. But not yet.
Well, as far as DB structure is concerned, this is ok.
But if we need some new systempreference or some new data in the
database (for instance some change in the marc framework...) then Schema
and its versioning system would not be enough. Any plans for that ?
-- 
Henri-Damien LAURENT


More information about the Koha-devel mailing list