From lculber at mdah.state.ms.us Tue Feb 1 15:07:26 2011 From: lculber at mdah.state.ms.us (Linda Culberson) Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:07:26 -0600 Subject: [Koha-devel] trying to maintain our control numbers as biblionumber Message-ID: <4D48139E.5060507@mdah.state.ms.us> Our local perl guru has managed to load our control numbers into the biblio.biblionumber, biblioitems.biblionumber, and items.biblionumber, However, it isn't matching the biblioitems.marcxml field for the 999 subfield c. I'm assuming it needs to match. Right? -- Linda Culberson lculber at mdah.state.ms.us Archives and Records Services Division Ms. Dept. of Archives& History P. O. Box 571 Jackson, MS 39205-0571 Telephone: 601/576-6873 Facsimile: 601/576-6824 From gmcharlt at gmail.com Tue Feb 1 15:20:46 2011 From: gmcharlt at gmail.com (Galen Charlton) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:20:46 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] trying to maintain our control numbers as biblionumber In-Reply-To: <4D48139E.5060507@mdah.state.ms.us> References: <4D48139E.5060507@mdah.state.ms.us> Message-ID: Hi, On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Linda Culberson wrote: > ?Our local perl guru has managed to load our control numbers into the > biblio.biblionumber, biblioitems.biblionumber, and items.biblionumber, > However, it isn't matching the biblioitems.marcxml field for the 999 > subfield c. > I'm assuming it needs to match. > Right? Right. You can run the batchRepairMissingBiblionumbers.pl batch job to update the MARC and MARXML blobs. After that, you should also reindex your database using rebuild_zebra.pl. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton gmcharlt at gmail.com From lculber at mdah.state.ms.us Tue Feb 1 15:24:01 2011 From: lculber at mdah.state.ms.us (Linda Culberson) Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 08:24:01 -0600 Subject: [Koha-devel] trying to maintain our control numbers as biblionumber In-Reply-To: References: <4D48139E.5060507@mdah.state.ms.us> Message-ID: <4D481781.8030004@mdah.state.ms.us> That helps a great deal, Galen. Thanks! On 2/1/2011 8:20 AM, Galen Charlton wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Linda Culberson > wrote: >> ? Our local perl guru has managed to load our control numbers into the >> biblio.biblionumber, biblioitems.biblionumber, and items.biblionumber, >> However, it isn't matching the biblioitems.marcxml field for the 999 >> subfield c. >> I'm assuming it needs to match. >> Right? > Right. You can run the batchRepairMissingBiblionumbers.pl batch job > to update the MARC and MARXML blobs. After that, you should also > reindex your database using rebuild_zebra.pl. > > Regards, > > Galen -- Linda Culberson lculber at mdah.state.ms.us Archives and Records Services Division Ms. Dept. of Archives& History P. O. Box 571 Jackson, MS 39205-0571 Telephone: 601/576-6873 Facsimile: 601/576-6824 From nengard at gmail.com Wed Feb 2 13:32:04 2011 From: nengard at gmail.com (Nicole Engard) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 07:32:04 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Vote for KohaCon 2011 Message-ID: Hello all, I have published the official vote for the location of KohaCon 2011. The vote will remain open until the 17th of February (EST). Please enter one vote per person and rank your options with your most favorite as 1 and your least favorite as 4. If you won't go somewhere no matter what then don't vote for that location. Read the proposals before you vote: http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/KohaCon2011_Proposals Vote here: http://survey.web2learning.net/limesurvey/index.php?sid=15529&lang=en Thanks Nicole C. Engard Documentation Manager From mjr at phonecoop.coop Wed Feb 2 16:00:08 2011 From: mjr at phonecoop.coop (MJ Ray) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:00:08 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Vote for KohaCon 2011 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20110202150008.3383E5028C@nail.towers.org.uk> Thomas Dukleth wrote: > I would appreciate people adding some informal range of expected > accommodation prices either to the wiki, > http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/KohaCon2011_Proposals , or on the > mailing list. I've done this for the UK offer. I estimate median hotel price is ?65/room/night and lowest I've seen so far is ?18. Restaurant dinners are mostly ?15-?50/person, a good take-away meal is ?5/person, a bad one is cheaper ;-) and you can, of course, spend much much more! That's all assuming we're in the seaside resort rather than the city, but it should be do-able. It would be nice to have more links to hotels at least from the other venues besides us and Kolkata, too. Regards, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. Past Koha Release Manager (2.0), LMS programmer, statistician, webmaster. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire for Koha work http://www.software.coop/products/koha From kmkale at anantcorp.com Thu Feb 3 07:17:11 2011 From: kmkale at anantcorp.com (Koustubha Kale) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:47:11 +0530 Subject: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Vote for KohaCon 2011 In-Reply-To: <20110202150008.3383E5028C@nail.towers.org.uk> References: <20110202150008.3383E5028C@nail.towers.org.uk> Message-ID: Hi, I have updated the information at http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/KohaCon2011_Proposals for VPM, Thane, India. Also thanks to Thomas Dukleth for updating some information.. Regards, Koustubha Kale Anant Corporation Contact Details : Address? : 103, Armaan Residency, R. W Sawant Road, Nr. Golden Dyes Naka, Thane (w), ? ? ? ? ??? ? ? Maharashtra, India, Pin : 400601. TeleFax? : +91-22-21720108, +91-22-21720109 Mobile? ?? : +919820715876 Website? :?http://www.anantcorp.com Blog :?http://www.anantcorp.com/blog/?author=2 From ecarrazana at uci.cu Thu Feb 3 17:48:16 2011 From: ecarrazana at uci.cu (Edisnel Carrazana Castro) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:48:16 -0500 (CST) Subject: [Koha-devel] Save user visits in Opac In-Reply-To: <204057158.153151296751318348.JavaMail.root@ucimail1.uci.cu> Message-ID: <338669340.157151296751696185.JavaMail.root@ucimail1.uci.cu> I want to register in a table the user visits to the site after logged in. In wich place of the source code of Koha can I do that? I push the function to insert the visit in a page [in opac-user.pl] , but several insertions occur whenever this page is accessed. What can I do? Thanks From tomascohen at gmail.com Thu Feb 3 18:17:55 2011 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 14:17:55 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Save user visits in Opac In-Reply-To: <338669340.157151296751696185.JavaMail.root@ucimail1.uci.cu> References: <204057158.153151296751318348.JavaMail.root@ucimail1.uci.cu> <338669340.157151296751696185.JavaMail.root@ucimail1.uci.cu> Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Edisnel Carrazana Castro wrote: > > ?I want to register in a table the user visits to the site after logged in. In wich place of the source code of Koha can I do that? > > I push the function to insert the visit in a page [in opac-user.pl] , but several insertions occur > whenever this page is accessed. What can I do? If I was you, I would rather enable the apache's access log and process it from the outside with some specialized tool like awstats. That way you can be sure you count several visits as different ones and such. If you want to do it visit-then-insert-into-table, the I would create a page (the language you prefer) and call it from a javascript function in 'opacuserjs' configuration variable. You can even use Google Analytics the same way. To+ From nfredsell at gmail.com Mon Feb 7 16:00:04 2011 From: nfredsell at gmail.com (Nelson Fredsell) Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:00:04 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Install hurdle, OpenSUSE on virtualbox Message-ID: <001f01cbc6d7$b4e55db0$1eb01910$@com> Dear all, I've been repeatedly working through install steps at http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Koha_3.0.0_on_openSUSE_11.3, and keep getting stuck. Currently, my Windows 7 laptop can't see the apache LAMP server on the OpenSUSE 11.3 virtualbox. With ifconfig I can see eth0 inet addr 192.168.1.16 Bcast 192.168.1.255 Mask 255.255.255.0. When I ping from the Windows side, I get request timed out. As indicated in the steps, I have a minimum install with no gui. Using yast to configure network. As an added step I changed from NAT to Bridged adapter in the VirtualBox config, but this didn't help. Any suggestions would be much appreciated. My current goal w/ Koha is to "simply" install the software, including Zebra. Nelson (nfred - irc) From oleonard at myacpl.org Mon Feb 7 16:06:03 2011 From: oleonard at myacpl.org (Owen Leonard) Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:06:03 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Install hurdle, OpenSUSE on virtualbox In-Reply-To: <001f01cbc6d7$b4e55db0$1eb01910$@com> References: <001f01cbc6d7$b4e55db0$1eb01910$@com> Message-ID: > Currently, my Windows 7 laptop can't see the apache LAMP > server on the OpenSUSE 11.3 virtualbox. This is not a problem with Koha installation, this is a problem with VirtualBox. I would recommend asking your question in their forum: http://forums.virtualbox.org/ Why not work on your Koha installation problems at the same time? Ask here about those while you're waiting to figure out your VirtualBox problems. -- Owen -- Web Developer Athens County Public Libraries http://www.myacpl.org From reedwade at gmail.com Mon Feb 7 19:06:10 2011 From: reedwade at gmail.com (Reed Wade) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 07:06:10 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Install hurdle, OpenSUSE on virtualbox In-Reply-To: References: <001f01cbc6d7$b4e55db0$1eb01910$@com> Message-ID: is getting slightly off the Koha topic but-- I tend to set up 2 network devices. One set for NAT and the other for Host-Only. The NAT interface normally gets a 10.x.x.x address (assigned via dhcp)and allows the guest OS to reach out to the outside world and get software updates and for other outgoing things. The Host-Only device normally gets a 192.x.x.x address assigned via dhcp and is used to connect inbound from the host machine. -reed On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Owen Leonard wrote: >> Currently, my Windows 7 laptop can't see the apache LAMP >> server on the OpenSUSE 11.3 virtualbox. > > This is not a problem with Koha installation, this is a problem with > VirtualBox. I would recommend asking your question in their forum: > > http://forums.virtualbox.org/ > > Why not work on your Koha installation problems at the same time? Ask > here about those while you're waiting to figure out your VirtualBox > problems. > > ?-- Owen > > > -- > Web Developer > Athens County Public Libraries > http://www.myacpl.org > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > From nengard at gmail.com Tue Feb 8 04:14:33 2011 From: nengard at gmail.com (Nicole Engard) Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 19:14:33 -0800 Subject: [Koha-devel] Call for Articles: February Newsletter Message-ID: Hi all, It's that time again - please get me your newsletter articles by the 23rd (your time zone) of February so that I can include them in the newsletter. Thanks a bunch, Nicole C. Engard From henridamien.laurent at biblibre.com Tue Feb 8 10:05:44 2011 From: henridamien.laurent at biblibre.com (LAURENT Henri-Damien) Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:05:44 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Workgroup on data persistence Message-ID: <4D510768.2070401@biblibre.com> Hi back in 2010, we talked about data persistance. And soon release is coming soon. So it is now time we make something about Data Persistance. Some tests have been done. Some results can be used. I propose we set some meeting next week any day in the morning between 8AM UTC to 12AM UTC. I donot set up a doodle. You can answer this message, I will try to gather trends. Hope that helps. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT From henridamien.laurent at biblibre.com Tue Feb 8 10:29:08 2011 From: henridamien.laurent at biblibre.com (LAURENT Henri-Damien) Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:29:08 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Solr and Z3950 server some news. Message-ID: <4D510CE4.70409@biblibre.com> Hi We are getting a pretty nice working z3950 server for solr there. We are parsing RPN queries quite generally using a perl module Regexp::Grammars::Z3950::RPN and RPN2Solr It is working quite well for simple usage (no exp1 or gils queries). But at the moment it is serving right only marcxml and not ISO2709. I think we may have to try and determine exactly what type of data the Z3950 server is supposed to send to yaz-client when serving "MARC" data. It comes with the wip/solr branch. I hope I will be able to add some information as of how to set a box on that branch soon. Hope that helps. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT From paul.poulain at biblibre.com Tue Feb 8 10:56:23 2011 From: paul.poulain at biblibre.com (Paul Poulain) Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:56:23 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Introducing Marc::Loader Message-ID: <4D511347.3030000@biblibre.com> Hello, We are happy (and proud) to announce the release of MARC::Loader 0.001001 It's a small lirary that transforms a hash into a MARC record. http://search.cpan.org/~reiveune/MARC-Loader-0.001001/lib/MARC/Loader.pm Feedback is welcomed either here or directly at perl at biblibre.com We plan to release some/many other tools around MARC in the next months. They are tools we use internally for our migrations. Hoping that will be usefull for many ppl ! (you can send congratulations to Stephane D: That's its first cpan contribution ;-) ) -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 From mjr at phonecoop.coop Tue Feb 8 11:42:59 2011 From: mjr at phonecoop.coop (MJ Ray) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 10:42:59 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Koha-devel] Workgroup on data persistence In-Reply-To: <4D510768.2070401@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <20110208104259.5E0005028C@nail.towers.org.uk> LAURENT Henri-Damien > So it is now time we make something about Data Persistance. > Some tests have been done. > Some results can be used. > I propose we set some meeting next week any day in the morning between > 8AM UTC to 12AM UTC. I would prefer Monday, Tuesday or Friday (strongly), 10-12 (weakly). Hope that helps, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. Past Koha Release Manager (2.0), LMS programmer, statistician, webmaster. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire for Koha work http://www.software.coop/products/koha From bmb at mail.libs.uga.edu Tue Feb 8 14:41:41 2011 From: bmb at mail.libs.uga.edu (Brad Baxter) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 08:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Introducing Marc::Loader In-Reply-To: <4D511347.3030000@biblibre.com> References: <4D511347.3030000@biblibre.com> Message-ID: Hello, I wonder why the hash structure you're proposing doesn't match the MARC-in-JSON proposal, http://dilettantes.code4lib.org/blog/2010/09/a-proposal-to-serialize-marc-in-json/ At first glance, it looks to me that your structure can't retain the order of fields or subfields. I realize that it's a first release, but it looks like the source is using modules that it isn't, well, using, e.g., YAML, Carp, Scalar::Util::reftype. But I may have missed something. Regards, Brad On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Paul Poulain wrote: > Hello, > > We are happy (and proud) to announce the release of MARC::Loader 0.001001 > It's a small lirary that transforms a hash into a MARC record. > > http://search.cpan.org/~reiveune/MARC-Loader-0.001001/lib/MARC/Loader.pm > > Feedback is welcomed either here or directly at perl at biblibre.com > > We plan to release some/many other tools around MARC in the next months. > They are tools we use internally for our migrations. > > Hoping that will be usefull for many ppl ! > > (you can send congratulations to Stephane D: That's its first cpan > contribution ;-) ) > > -- > Paul POULAIN > http://www.biblibre.com > Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc > Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 > > From oleonard at myacpl.org Tue Feb 8 17:46:51 2011 From: oleonard at myacpl.org (Owen Leonard) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 11:46:51 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking comments on Bug 5234 - Remove unused CSS files Message-ID: These CSS files look like they're a relic of pre-3.0 days: intranet-print.css intranet.css intranet2.css intranet2popup.css This one hasn't been touched sine 2007: staff-global2.css ...Is it used by anyone? What about blue.css? http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5234 Thanks, Owen -- Web Developer Athens County Public Libraries http://www.myacpl.org From ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Tue Feb 8 18:14:42 2011 From: ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com (Ian Walls) Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:14:42 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking comments on Bug 5234 - Remove unused CSS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Owen, I know one library that uses blue.css. It either needs some work, or they need to use intranetusercss to do the eye-pleasing colour change. -Ian On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Owen Leonard wrote: > These CSS files look like they're a relic of pre-3.0 days: > > intranet-print.css > intranet.css > intranet2.css > intranet2popup.css > > This one hasn't been touched sine 2007: > > staff-global2.css > > ...Is it used by anyone? > > What about blue.css? > > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5234 > > Thanks, > > Owen > > -- > Web Developer > Athens County Public Libraries > http://www.myacpl.org > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Ian Walls Lead Development Specialist ByWater Solutions Phone # (888) 900-8944 http://bywatersolutions.com ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Twitter: @sekjal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bob at calyx.net.au Tue Feb 8 22:12:57 2011 From: bob at calyx.net.au (Bob Birchall) Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 08:12:57 +1100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking comments on Bug 5234 - Remove unused CSS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D51B1D9.8060007@calyx.net.au> We also have one client using blue.css but they intend to change back at the next upgrade. Bob Birchall Calyx On 09/02/11 04:14, Ian Walls wrote: > Owen, > > > I know one library that uses blue.css. It either needs some work, or > they need to use intranetusercss to do the eye-pleasing colour change. > > > -Ian > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Owen Leonard > wrote: > > These CSS files look like they're a relic of pre-3.0 days: > > intranet-print.css > intranet.css > intranet2.css > intranet2popup.css > > This one hasn't been touched sine 2007: > > staff-global2.css > > ...Is it used by anyone? > > What about blue.css? > > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5234 > > Thanks, > > Owen From laurenthdl at alinto.com Tue Feb 8 22:18:25 2011 From: laurenthdl at alinto.com (LAURENT Henri-Damien) Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:18:25 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking comments on Bug 5234 - Remove unused CSS files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D51B321.1010505@alinto.com> Hi blue.css was left quite unmaintained, though it brought along more colors and therefore was warmer. But well would need work. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT BibLibre Le 08/02/2011 18:14, Ian Walls a ?crit : > Owen, > > > I know one library that uses blue.css. It either needs some work, or > they need to use intranetusercss to do the eye-pleasing colour change. > > > -Ian > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Owen Leonard > wrote: > > These CSS files look like they're a relic of pre-3.0 days: > > intranet-print.css > intranet.css > intranet2.css > intranet2popup.css > > This one hasn't been touched sine 2007: > > staff-global2.css > > ...Is it used by anyone? > > What about blue.css? > > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5234 > > Thanks, > > Owen > From paul.poulain at biblibre.com Wed Feb 9 09:22:31 2011 From: paul.poulain at biblibre.com (Paul Poulain) Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:22:31 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking comments on Bug 5234 - Remove unused CSS files In-Reply-To: <4D51B321.1010505@alinto.com> References: <4D51B321.1010505@alinto.com> Message-ID: <4D524EC7.3020104@biblibre.com> Le 08/02/2011 22:18, LAURENT Henri-Damien a ?crit : > Hi > blue.css was left quite unmaintained, though it brought along more > colors and therefore was warmer. > But well would need work. My opinion is that the standard "white and black" colors are not fancy enough. I changed my mind on this subject : I thought fancyness was just something for tv ppl that must hide their emptyness behing fancy colors. I still think that in fact. But when competing another ILS in a RFP, when the librarians have a demo, I have heard some librarians saying "your interface is sad, more colors/pictures would be better,..." I know *for sure* we already have lost one RFP just because of the look of our librarian interface. The library project manager was very annoyed by this reason, thinking Koha was the best in terms of features, but the librarians were convinced by another ILS, and the main reason was ... the colors. I agree it's really stupid/silly/whatever you want, but I think we have to deal with that : I think Koha 3.4 with a new librarian default color style could be advertised as "we changed everything, look how fancy it is", and that would work much better than "in Koha 3.4 we now have this great feature". So, the next question is, imo: who could write a nice&fancy color stylesheet ? (no-one at BibLibre :( ) -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 From paul.poulain at biblibre.com Wed Feb 9 10:27:32 2011 From: paul.poulain at biblibre.com (Paul Poulain) Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:27:32 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha 3.4 sprint-week organised by BibLibre Message-ID: <4D525E04.80602@biblibre.com> Hello, For those not following our blog, pls take a look at: http://www.biblibre.com/en/blog/entry/koha-34-sprint-week-from-apr-4th-to-8th All BibLibre will work on this sprint week, and we hope many ppl will join us ! If someone in America,Oceania, Asia, Africa, or Artica want to join, he will be welcomed, but maybe it's even better to organize your own sprint-week in your area ;-) friendly -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 From ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Wed Feb 9 14:36:49 2011 From: ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com (Ian Walls) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 08:36:49 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking comments on Bug 5234 - Remove unused CSS files In-Reply-To: <4D524EC7.3020104@biblibre.com> References: <4D51B321.1010505@alinto.com> <4D524EC7.3020104@biblibre.com> Message-ID: yes, unfortunately "how it looks" is a factor in the decision. The OPAC gets lots of attention, and there are some gorgeous ones out there, but not a lot of folks customize the staff client, since just the librarains see it. I'd love to spend more time on the staff interface, but I'm hardly a CSS artist. I'll happily test and provide feedback, and work in depth on small details like rounded edges with CSS3 or adjusting margins, if anyone else can provide the initial design. I'd also like to see a new feature that allows librarians to upload their own CSS file through the GUI. Provide a template to download, them them go to town, and then upload. Same with XSLT, now that I mention it. -Ian On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Paul Poulain wrote: > Le 08/02/2011 22:18, LAURENT Henri-Damien a ?crit : > > Hi > > blue.css was left quite unmaintained, though it brought along more > > colors and therefore was warmer. > > But well would need work. > My opinion is that the standard "white and black" colors are not fancy > enough. > I changed my mind on this subject : I thought fancyness was just > something for tv ppl that must hide their emptyness behing fancy colors. > I still think that in fact. But when competing another ILS in a RFP, > when the librarians have a demo, I have heard some librarians saying > "your interface is sad, more colors/pictures would be better,..." > I know *for sure* we already have lost one RFP just because of the look > of our librarian interface. > The library project manager was very annoyed by this reason, thinking > Koha was the best in terms of features, but the librarians were > convinced by another ILS, and the main reason was ... the colors. > I agree it's really stupid/silly/whatever you want, but I think we have > to deal with that : I think Koha 3.4 with a new librarian default color > style could be advertised as "we changed everything, look how fancy it > is", and that would work much better than "in Koha 3.4 we now have this > great feature". > > So, the next question is, imo: who could write a nice&fancy color > stylesheet ? (no-one at BibLibre :( ) > > -- > Paul POULAIN > http://www.biblibre.com > Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc > Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Ian Walls Lead Development Specialist ByWater Solutions Phone # (888) 900-8944 http://bywatersolutions.com ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Twitter: @sekjal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dschust1 at gmail.com Wed Feb 9 18:40:01 2011 From: dschust1 at gmail.com (David Schuster) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:40:01 -0600 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha 3.4 sprint-week organised by BibLibre In-Reply-To: <4D525E04.80602@biblibre.com> References: <4D525E04.80602@biblibre.com> Message-ID: Wonderful idea! Wish I could come, but then again I wouldn't be of much use! Well guess I could document and wrangle bugs! David On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Paul Poulain wrote: > Hello, > > For those not following our blog, pls take a look at: > > http://www.biblibre.com/en/blog/entry/koha-34-sprint-week-from-apr-4th-to-8th > > All BibLibre will work on this sprint week, and we hope many ppl will > join us ! > > If someone in America,Oceania, Asia, Africa, or Artica want to join, he > will be welcomed, but maybe it's even better to organize your own > sprint-week in your area ;-) > > friendly > > -- > Paul POULAIN > http://www.biblibre.com > Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc > Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- David Schuster Plano ISD Library Technology Coordinator -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From chris at bigballofwax.co.nz Wed Feb 9 18:41:21 2011 From: chris at bigballofwax.co.nz (Chris Cormack) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 06:41:21 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha 3.4 sprint-week organised by BibLibre In-Reply-To: References: <4D525E04.80602@biblibre.com> Message-ID: 2011/2/10 David Schuster : > Wonderful idea!? Wish I could come, but then again I wouldn't be of much > use!? Well guess I could document and wrangle bugs! > > You can do that anyway :) The sprint is a great idea, but we need people testing and closing bugs NOW also :) Chris From dschust1 at gmail.com Wed Feb 9 19:09:27 2011 From: dschust1 at gmail.com (David Schuster) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:09:27 -0600 Subject: [Koha-devel] Workgroup on data persistence In-Reply-To: <20110208104259.5E0005028C@nail.towers.org.uk> References: <4D510768.2070401@biblibre.com> <20110208104259.5E0005028C@nail.towers.org.uk> Message-ID: Is this a programmer type thing or are there things lay librarians could help with? On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:42 AM, MJ Ray wrote: > LAURENT Henri-Damien > > So it is now time we make something about Data Persistance. > > Some tests have been done. > > Some results can be used. > > I propose we set some meeting next week any day in the morning between > > 8AM UTC to 12AM UTC. > > I would prefer Monday, Tuesday or Friday (strongly), 10-12 (weakly). > > Hope that helps, > -- > MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. > Past Koha Release Manager (2.0), LMS programmer, statistician, webmaster. > In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html > Available for hire for Koha work http://www.software.coop/products/koha > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- David Schuster Plano ISD Library Technology Coordinator -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kohadevel at agogme.com Fri Feb 11 01:08:11 2011 From: kohadevel at agogme.com (Thomas Dukleth) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:08:11 -0000 (UCT) Subject: [Koha-devel] Solr and Z3950 server some news. In-Reply-To: <4D510CE4.70409@biblibre.com> References: <4D510CE4.70409@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <4ef2c1d826b8ef42ff870d0fba44be54.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> Reply inline: On Tue, February 8, 2011 09:29, LAURENT Henri-Damien wrote: > Hi > We are getting a pretty nice working z3950 server for solr there. > We are parsing RPN queries quite generally using a perl module > Regexp::Grammars::Z3950::RPN > and RPN2Solr > It is working quite well for simple usage (no exp1 or gils queries). Hooray. I greatly appreciate the work which BibLibre are doing for supporting a Z39.50/SRU server using Solr/Lucene. I note that the tests for SimpleServer using Solr/Lucene, http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/SimpleServer_as_a_Z39.50/SRU_Server_Test_Queries_for_Koha_with_Solr/Lucene , are as underpopulated as I had left them when I had to return to working on a non-library project. I took the time to write this message but I do not have the time to completely populate the tests presently. An important point of the few tests which I had included is that useful functionality such as stemming should not be activated for a Z39.50/SRU query unless specifically specified in the query. In the case of copy cataloguing, avoiding matches not specifically specified in the query is very important. Copy cataloguing use might need the opposite defaults to what may most often benefit OPAC users. If providing or avoiding various forms of query expansion cannot be specified at query time for Solr/Lucene, then we will need separate indexes with different defaults to which queries may be directed as appropriate to the query. > > But at the moment it is serving right only marcxml and not ISO2709. I > think we may have to try and determine exactly what type of data the > Z3950 server is supposed to send to yaz-client when serving "MARC" data. YAZ can convert between MARCXML and ISO 2709. YAZ can perform both server and client functions. I have not investigated precisely how to pass MARCXML to YAZ for returning ISO 2709 as a server side function, although, I have implemented such conversions as client functionality. I do not have time to investigate presently. A Z39.50/SRU server should return records in accordances whatever record syntaxes are specified as supported in the explain record. Universal practise for Z39.50 server support of record syntax differs from the standard in that a single Z39.50 server database is only expected to support one record syntax. Support for different record syntaxes over Z39.50 is obtained in practise by providing different database targets on the server which may be specified by the server as different database names or the same database name but running on a different port. In the case of SRU, it is common for a single database target to support multiple record syntaxes and return the record syntax which is specified in the SRU query. We are still a long ways from an ISO 2709 free world, therefore, a server which only returns MARCXML is insufficient. I note that the default Zebra Z39.50 server configuration in Koha seems to only return MARCXML, but that is a configuration deficiency. We should also not presume that a Z39.50/SRU client is using YAZ, although, a YAZ based client would be best as the primary client for testing. [...] Thomas Dukleth Agogme 109 E 9th Street, 3D New York, NY 10003 USA http://www.agogme.com +1 212-674-3783 From henridamien.laurent at biblibre.com Fri Feb 11 09:14:29 2011 From: henridamien.laurent at biblibre.com (LAURENT Henri-Damien) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:14:29 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Solr and Z3950 server some news. In-Reply-To: <4ef2c1d826b8ef42ff870d0fba44be54.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> References: <4D510CE4.70409@biblibre.com> <4ef2c1d826b8ef42ff870d0fba44be54.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> Message-ID: <4D54EFE5.2070403@biblibre.com> Le 11/02/2011 01:08, Thomas Dukleth a ?crit : > Reply inline: > > > On Tue, February 8, 2011 09:29, LAURENT Henri-Damien wrote: >> Hi >> We are getting a pretty nice working z3950 server for solr there. >> We are parsing RPN queries quite generally using a perl module >> Regexp::Grammars::Z3950::RPN >> and RPN2Solr >> It is working quite well for simple usage (no exp1 or gils queries). > > Hooray. I greatly appreciate the work which BibLibre are doing for > supporting a Z39.50/SRU server using Solr/Lucene. > > I note that the tests for SimpleServer using Solr/Lucene, > http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/SimpleServer_as_a_Z39.50/SRU_Server_Test_Queries_for_Koha_with_Solr/Lucene > , are as underpopulated as I had left them when I had to return to working > on a non-library project. I took the time to write this message but I do > not have the time to completely populate the tests presently. > > An important point of the few tests which I had included is that useful > functionality such as stemming should not be activated for a Z39.50/SRU > query unless specifically specified in the query. In the case of copy > cataloguing, avoiding matches not specifically specified in the query is > very important. Copy cataloguing use might need the opposite defaults to > what may most often benefit OPAC users. If providing or avoiding various > forms of query expansion cannot be specified at query time for > Solr/Lucene, then we will need separate indexes with different defaults to > which queries may be directed as appropriate to the query. Yes, could be achieved with separate indexes and some tweaking to the query. But at the moment, we have not embedded Stemming or approximative search, so it would be the default behaviour. > >> >> But at the moment it is serving right only marcxml and not ISO2709. I >> think we may have to try and determine exactly what type of data the >> Z3950 server is supposed to send to yaz-client when serving "MARC" data. > > YAZ can convert between MARCXML and ISO 2709. YAZ can perform both server > and client functions. I have not investigated precisely how to pass > MARCXML to YAZ for returning ISO 2709 as a server side function, although, > I have implemented such conversions as client functionality. I do not > have time to investigate presently. Problem is that simply sending the marc generated by koha leads to this BAD MARC error. So we are looking for information in order to know WHAT SimpleServer should be sending. We are still investigating. Friendly -- Henri-Damien LAURENT > > A Z39.50/SRU server should return records in accordances whatever record > syntaxes are specified as supported in the explain record. > > Universal practise for Z39.50 server support of record syntax differs from > the standard in that a single Z39.50 server database is only expected to > support one record syntax. Support for different record syntaxes over > Z39.50 is obtained in practise by providing different database targets on > the server which may be specified by the server as different database > names or the same database name but running on a different port. In the > case of SRU, it is common for a single database target to support multiple > record syntaxes and return the record syntax which is specified in the SRU > query. > > We are still a long ways from an ISO 2709 free world, therefore, a server > which only returns MARCXML is insufficient. I note that the default Zebra > Z39.50 server configuration in Koha seems to only return MARCXML, but that > is a configuration deficiency. We should also not presume that a > Z39.50/SRU client is using YAZ, although, a YAZ based client would be best > as the primary client for testing. > > [...] From kohadevel at agogme.com Fri Feb 11 10:31:52 2011 From: kohadevel at agogme.com (Thomas Dukleth) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:31:52 -0000 (UCT) Subject: [Koha-devel] Solr and Z3950 server some news. In-Reply-To: <4D54EFE5.2070403@biblibre.com> References: <4D510CE4.70409@biblibre.com> <4ef2c1d826b8ef42ff870d0fba44be54.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> <4D54EFE5.2070403@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <02ac1f4ee319671a732cc1440d28be21.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> Reply inline: On Fri, February 11, 2011 08:14, LAURENT Henri-Damien wrote: [...] > Problem is that simply sending the marc generated by koha leads to this > BAD MARC error. What part of the server or client is reporting the "BAD MARC" error when sending ISO 2709 records but not reporting an error when sending MARCXML records? > So we are looking for information in order to know WHAT > SimpleServer should be sending. > We are still investigating. [...] Thomas Dukleth Agogme 109 E 9th Street, 3D New York, NY 10003 USA http://www.agogme.com +1 212-674-3783 From savitra.sirohi at osslabs.biz Fri Feb 11 18:12:29 2011 From: savitra.sirohi at osslabs.biz (savitra sirohi) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:42:29 +0530 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha and IE7 Message-ID: Folks, one of our customers is looking to use Koha with IE7. We will probably need to test Koha on IE7 and then fix all significant issues in a short period of time. We don't want to overcommit, so should we take this on? How many issues are we likely to find? And of what type - css, js? I really appreciate any input on this. - Savitra From oleonard at myacpl.org Fri Feb 11 18:32:25 2011 From: oleonard at myacpl.org (Owen Leonard) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:32:25 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha and IE7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > We don't want to overcommit, so should we take this on? How many > issues are we likely to find? And of what type - css, js? From oleonard at myacpl.org Fri Feb 11 18:44:17 2011 From: oleonard at myacpl.org (Owen Leonard) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:44:17 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha and IE7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I wrote: > We have tried to correct > JavaScript problems with Internet Explorer whenever we find them, but > it's likely you'll find more. ...and it didn't take me long to find one. I've submitted a patch, but take a look: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5741 This is probably the most common JavaScript problem in Internet Explorer we've seen in the past. -- Owen -- Web Developer Athens County Public Libraries http://www.myacpl.org From kohadevel at agogme.com Fri Feb 11 20:01:04 2011 From: kohadevel at agogme.com (Thomas Dukleth) Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:01:04 -0000 (UCT) Subject: [Koha-devel] Solr and Z3950 server some news. In-Reply-To: <4D550BB2.1090801@gmail.com> References: <4D510CE4.70409@biblibre.com> <4ef2c1d826b8ef42ff870d0fba44be54.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> <4D54EFE5.2070403@biblibre.com> <02ac1f4ee319671a732cc1440d28be21.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> <4D550BB2.1090801@gmail.com> Message-ID: <35132216e858a2e00a6b966fa9552380.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> When briefly testing the BibLibre test configuration of SimpleServer Z39.50 server I have found same problem as BibLibre are reporting when using yaz-client. I have also noted some other issues. 1. BAD MARC ERROR. When setting format to UNIMARC in yaz-client, the following error message is returned along with the record when displaying a record with the show command. "[]Record type: Unimarc bad MARC. Dumping as it is:" When setting format to XML in yaz-client, no error message is returned when displaying a record with the show command. "[]Record type: XML" The issue seems to be consistent for all records in the result set. YAZ is converting between ISO 2709 and MARCXML on the client side. yaz-client does not report a "bad MARC" error when displaying UNIMARC MARCXML records returned from Zebra in ISO 2709 form. Whatever the MARC error may be, it prevents YAZ from parsing the records properly in ISO 2709. Consequently, unlike yaz-client, my very well tested PHP YAZ based Z39.50 client obtains the result set but cannot even attempt to display the records because it relies upon YAZ for parsing them. 2. INVARIANT RESULT SET. In the configuration which I tested, any query would return exactly the same 1011 record result set whether or not there would be any legitimate matches. 3. MISSING EXPLAIN RECORD. Lack of an Explain record should not be fatal but might be helpful for obtaining more debugging information from YAZ. 4. DEBUGGING. I do not have time to try intensive tests myself. First, fix the issue where the result set is an invariant 1011 records. I suggest having yaz-client save the ISO 2709 records, then attempt to validate them with MARC::Lint keeping in mind that most errors would be from the MARC 21 checks in MARC::Lint. I have not verified that MARCXML is working with SimpleServer using Solr/Lucene but I would be happy to test that if some SimpleServer target would be configured to return only MARCXML. If all else fails, Index Data can help solve the problems for a very significant fee. Thomas Dukleth Agogme 109 E 9th Street, 3D New York, NY 10003 USA http://www.agogme.com +1 212-674-3783 From savitra.sirohi at osslabs.biz Sun Feb 13 12:08:44 2011 From: savitra.sirohi at osslabs.biz (savitra sirohi) Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 16:38:44 +0530 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha and IE7 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Owen, thanks very much for the input, this makes me more comfortable. I think we should be able to resolve this type of JS issues quickly and we may get the customer to accept the IE CSS rendering as is. If we do this we will create bugs and submit patches for your signoff. Thanks, Savitra On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Owen Leonard wrote: > I wrote: >> We have tried to correct >> JavaScript problems with Internet Explorer whenever we find them, but >> it's likely you'll find more. > > ...and it didn't take me long to find one. I've submitted a patch, but > take a look: > > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5741 > > This is probably the most common JavaScript problem in Internet > Explorer we've seen in the past. > > ?-- Owen > > -- > Web Developer > Athens County Public Libraries > http://www.myacpl.org > From cnighswonger at foundations.edu Mon Feb 14 03:51:20 2011 From: cnighswonger at foundations.edu (Chris Nighswonger) Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 21:51:20 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] 3.2.4 Release Schedule Message-ID: Well, its that time again! 3.2.4 is on track to be released on February 22, 2011, however, there is another important date between now and then which you should be aware of. On February 15, 2011, 3.2.4 will enter a string freeze to facilitate finalization of translation updates. After this date the only patches introducing string changes which will be pushed for 3.2.4 will be those addressing blocker bugs or security issues. All others will be pushed to 3.2.5. Patches not introducing string changes will be pushed up to the time of the release. Keep up the good work! Kind Regards, Chris Nighswonger 3.2 Release Maintainer -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nengard at gmail.com Mon Feb 14 15:49:05 2011 From: nengard at gmail.com (Nicole Engard) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:49:05 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Vote for KohaCon 2011 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello all, we already have over 400 votes. If you want your vote counted be sure to vote before the 17th (this week). Nicole On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Nicole Engard wrote: > Hello all, > > I have published the official vote for the location of KohaCon 2011. > The vote will remain open until the 17th of February (EST). ?Please > enter one vote per person and rank your options with your most > favorite as 1 and your least favorite as 4. If you won't go somewhere > no matter what then don't vote for that location. ?Read the proposals > before you vote: > http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/KohaCon2011_Proposals > > Vote here: http://survey.web2learning.net/limesurvey/index.php?sid=15529&lang=en > > Thanks > Nicole C. Engard > Documentation Manager > From paul.poulain at biblibre.com Mon Feb 14 18:26:50 2011 From: paul.poulain at biblibre.com (Paul Poulain) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:26:50 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Partneship between BibLibre and Catalyst to sponsor development on Koha Message-ID: <4D5965DA.7010506@biblibre.com> Just FYI : http://www.biblibre.com/en/blog/entry/partneship-between-biblibre-and-catalyst-to-sponsor-development-on-koha Friendly -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 From dearden at sarsf.org Mon Feb 14 20:15:22 2011 From: dearden at sarsf.org (Doug Dearden) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:15:22 -0700 Subject: [Koha-devel] Intro and question Message-ID: Hello all, I realized I had never introduced myself on this list. I am the "do everything" guy at the School for Advanced Research in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. We are a non-profit research facility and have an on-campus library where we are currently running Koha. I am responsible for all computer support, networks, servers, etc. on campus except for our public web site - that is handled by a couple of other very capable guys. As such I get into programming infrequently, but have enough of a history coding in different languages that I can usually figure out what I need to do by hitting online references and such. I would definitely not characterize myself as a full time developer, but feel comfortable tweaking existing code to get things working the way we want. On our current Koha install I modified the xsl files to display links stored in the 856u field as images instead of text link, a feature our librarian wanted to function on a particular database that she is using to catalog some archival photos. I am now working on getting this working in a way that I can contribute back and hopefully have integrated into Koha - see bug 5738. I have this working for the MARC21 files - I got it working on the OPAC last week and on the Staff Client today, but also wanted to get the unimarc files modified as well. I have done some coding but realized I needed to test this. And here is my question. I did another DEV install, and chose unimarc during the when answering the questions. That question only seemed to apply to zebra though. Looking at the koha-conf.xml it looks like it is pointing to the MARC21 xsl files. What do I need to do to get a unimarc dev install working? I have not yet connected to the admin page as I didn't want to populate the database with MARC21 info. Does it happen automatically there? Any guidance appreciated. Thanks, Doug Dearden Director, IT School for Advanced Research (505)954-7220 sarweb.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jransom at library.org.nz Mon Feb 14 21:14:23 2011 From: jransom at library.org.nz (Joann Ransom) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:14:23 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Partneship between BibLibre and Catalyst to sponsor development on Koha In-Reply-To: References: <4D5965DA.7010506@biblibre.com> Message-ID: yay! I love the Koha community so much :) Go Biblibre and go Catalyst :) Cheers Jo. 2011/2/15 Lori Bowen Ayre > BibLibre and Catalyst +++ > > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Paul Poulain wrote: > >> Just FYI : >> >> http://www.biblibre.com/en/blog/entry/partneship-between-biblibre-and-catalyst-to-sponsor-development-on-koha >> >> Friendly >> >> -- >> Paul POULAIN >> http://www.biblibre.com >> Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc >> Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org >> Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz >> http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha >> > > > > -- > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > Lori Bowen Ayre // Library Technology Consultant > The Galecia Group // www.galecia.com > (707) 763-6869 // Lori.Ayre at galecia.com > > Specializing in open source ILS solutions, RFID, > filtering, > workflow optimization, and materials handling > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org > Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz > http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha > > -- Joann Ransom RLIANZA Head of Libraries, Horowhenua Library Trust. *Q: Why is this email three sentences or less? A: http://three.sentenc.es* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gmcharlt at gmail.com Mon Feb 14 22:46:32 2011 From: gmcharlt at gmail.com (Galen Charlton) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 16:46:32 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Intro and question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Doug, 2011/2/14 Doug Dearden : > I have this working for the MARC21 files ? I got it working on the OPAC last > week and on the Staff Client today, but also wanted to get the unimarc files > modified as well.?? I have done some coding but realized I needed to test > this.? And here is my question.? I did another DEV install, and chose > unimarc during the when answering the questions.? That question only seemed > to apply to zebra though.? Looking at the koha-conf.xml it looks like it is > pointing to the MARC21 xsl files.? What do I need to do to get a unimarc dev > install working?? I have not yet connected to the admin page as I didn?t > want to populate the database with MARC21 info.? Does it happen > automatically there?? Any guidance appreciated. Good on you for thinking of the UNIMARC users. In this case, the references to the MARC21 stylesheets that you see even after choosing UNIMARC can be ignored for your immediate purposes. They are used only if you are using requesting on-the-fly conversion of the MARC records to other formats such as RDF, MODS, and so forth from Koha's Z39.50 server. However, Koha's OPAC itself doesn't use that functionality, so if you're working on the OPAC display XSLT, the fact that you chose UNIMARC during installation is enough to get Koha to point to the correct stylesheets. Obviously, it *is* a bug that the stylesheets referenced in koha-conf.xml don't have UNIMARC equivalents, but that's a bug that quite possibly has never been encountered in practice. For your reference, what it's doing is checking the marcflavour system preference to determine if the database is UNIMARC or MARC21. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton gmcharlt at gmail.com From reedwade at gmail.com Tue Feb 15 00:54:17 2011 From: reedwade at gmail.com (Reed Wade) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:54:17 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] reminder when editing JS -- (IE hates you) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: And, if I learned how to read mail better I'd notice this was already a recent topic of discussion. Nevermind, -reed On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Reed Wade wrote: > I've just been fixing some of these which cause random versions of IE > to fail in random ways so thought I'd send a reminder to the list. > > Compare this: > > > Calendar.setup({ > ? ?blah ?: "pie", > ? ?blarg : "cake", > }); > > > with this: > > > Calendar.setup({ > ? ?blah ?: "pie", > ? ?blarg : "cake" > }); > > > That spare comma after the cake in the first example will cause some > flavours of IE to choke. Most browsers aren't so fragile on that > point. > > It's easy to accidentally leave these laying around when changing args > around and they don't tend to break for most browsers. Maybe we can > add in a test for these at some point in the future. I can imagine a > regex that should catch the bulk if not all of them. > > -reed > From kohalist at agogme.com Wed Feb 2 13:43:01 2011 From: kohalist at agogme.com (Thomas Dukleth) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:43:01 -0000 (UCT) Subject: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Vote for KohaCon 2011 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I would appreciate people adding some informal range of expected accommodation prices either to the wiki, http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/KohaCon2011_Proposals , or on the mailing list. Thomas Dukleth Agogme 109 E 9th Street, 3D New York, NY 10003 USA http://www.agogme.com +1 212-674-3783 From lori.ayre at galecia.com Mon Feb 14 19:22:31 2011 From: lori.ayre at galecia.com (Lori Bowen Ayre) Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:22:31 -0800 Subject: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Partneship between BibLibre and Catalyst to sponsor development on Koha In-Reply-To: <4D5965DA.7010506@biblibre.com> References: <4D5965DA.7010506@biblibre.com> Message-ID: BibLibre and Catalyst +++ On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Paul Poulain wrote: > Just FYI : > > http://www.biblibre.com/en/blog/entry/partneship-between-biblibre-and-catalyst-to-sponsor-development-on-koha > > Friendly > > -- > Paul POULAIN > http://www.biblibre.com > Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc > Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 > > _______________________________________________ > Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org > Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz > http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha > -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Lori Bowen Ayre // Library Technology Consultant The Galecia Group // www.galecia.com (707) 763-6869 // Lori.Ayre at galecia.com Specializing in open source ILS solutions, RFID, filtering, workflow optimization, and materials handling =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From reed at catalyst.net.nz Tue Feb 15 00:08:52 2011 From: reed at catalyst.net.nz (Reed Wade) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:08:52 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] reminder when editing JS -- (IE hates you) Message-ID: I've just been fixing some of these which cause random versions of IE to fail in random ways so thought I'd send a reminder to the list. Compare this: Calendar.setup({ blah : "pie", blarg : "cake", }); with this: Calendar.setup({ blah : "pie", blarg : "cake" }); That spare comma after the cake in the first example will cause some flavours of IE to choke. Most browsers aren't so fragile on that point. It's easy to accidentally leave these laying around when changing args around and they don't tend to break for most browsers. Maybe we can add in a test for these at some point in the future. I can imagine a regex that should catch the bulk if not all of them. -reed From mjr at phonecoop.coop Tue Feb 15 10:37:09 2011 From: mjr at phonecoop.coop (MJ Ray) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:37:09 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Koha-devel] Devel list admin OK? was: [Koha] Vote for KohaCon 2011 Message-ID: <20110215093709.367DC5028C@nail.towers.org.uk> > Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:43:01 -0000 (UCT) > From: "Thomas Dukleth" [...] > X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:32:02 +0100 15-2 = 13 days. Does the devel list need more admins? Thanks, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. Past Koha Release Manager (2.0), LMS programmer, statistician, webmaster. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire for Koha work http://www.software.coop/products/koha From henridamien.laurent at gmail.com Tue Feb 15 11:18:06 2011 From: henridamien.laurent at gmail.com (LAURENT Henri-Damien) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:18:06 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Devel list admin OK? was: [Koha] Vote for KohaCon 2011 In-Reply-To: <20110215093709.367DC5028C@nail.towers.org.uk> References: <20110215093709.367DC5028C@nail.towers.org.uk> Message-ID: <4D5A52DE.7090503@gmail.com> Le 15/02/2011 10:37, MJ Ray a ?crit : >> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:43:01 -0000 (UCT) >> From: "Thomas Dukleth" > [...] >> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:32:02 +0100 > > 15-2 = 13 days. Does the devel list need more admins? > > Thanks, Are you putting your name on that ? kind regards. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT From semarie-koha at latrappe.fr Tue Feb 15 11:53:30 2011 From: semarie-koha at latrappe.fr (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E8re_S=E9bastien?= Marie) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:53:30 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Imported MARC notice and Authorities: : inconsistent database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20110215105330.GB20709@latrappe.fr> Hello, As we obtain no reply for an inconsistent database, I will explain again the problem, with SQL for examples. Currently, after using imported set of notices and using it we have the following results: SELECT count(*) FROM biblioitems WHERE extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') != '' AND extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') NOT IN ( SELECT authid FROM auth_header ); +----------+ | count(*) | +----------+ | 121 | +----------+ english-version: If I extract from MarcXML (on table biblioitems) the 700.9 (Primary Author, koha_internal_code) and search in auth_header, we currently have 121 items with no-existent 700.9 . This is only a part of the problem: some 700.9 are existent but wrong (points to bad authority). SELECT count(*) FROM biblioitems, auth_header WHERE extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') = auth_header.authid AND extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="a"]') != extractvalue(auth_header.marcxml, '/record/datafield[@tag="200"]/subfield[@code="a"]'); +----------+ | count(*) | +----------+ | 3 | +----------+ Any suggestions ? This seems a bug (in import of notices where old koha_internal_code is not removed), but I would prefered have your opinion before submit a bugreport. And I will like some clues to correct the inconsitences ! Thanks. -- Fr?re S?bastien Marie Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe 61380 Soligny-la-Trappe T?l: 02.33.84.17.00 Fax: 02.33.34.98.57 Web: http://www.latrappe.fr/ On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:13:28PM +0100, Fr?re S?bastien Marie wrote: > Hello, > > Recently, we have imported a set of notices, from another abbey, in > the reservoir. > > When we create a new examplar using the previous imported notices, > the field 700.9 (authority - internal koha number) refering the > auth_id isn't updated or removed (still reference the old authority > number, in the other catalog). > > As result, we have an examplar with 700.a (authority name) correct, > but with an internal reference wrong (not valid in us catalog). > > If we search all notices linked with an authority, there is wrong > attribution. > > Next an example. > > Starting with: > - Notices in reservoir: > - Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) [from import] > > - Authority in catalog: > - Author_B (auth_id = 1) [created locally] > > - Notice in catalog: > - Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > > Next, we create a new examplar based on notice in reservoir, result: > - Authority in catalog: > - Author_B (auth_id = 1) [created locally] > > - Notice in catalog: > - Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) > - Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > (doubt if Author_A added in authorities or not) > > Now, if search notice attached with Author_B (auth_id = 1): > results: > - Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) > - Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > The database is inconsistent. > > Where is the problem: > - a misused of imported MARC: an option somewhere should be set... > - a bug in importing MARC: 700.9 should be cleaned before import... > - another possibility ? > > Currently, no bug report filled, as I don't no if it is a misusing > or a bug. > > Thanks. > -- > Fr?re S?bastien Marie > Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe > 61380 Soligny-la-Trappe > T?l: 02.33.84.17.00 > Fax: 02.33.34.98.57 > Web: http://www.latrappe.fr/ From fridolyn.somers at gmail.com Tue Feb 15 12:44:22 2011 From: fridolyn.somers at gmail.com (Fridolyn SOMERS) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:44:22 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Imported MARC notice and Authorities: : inconsistent database In-Reply-To: <20110215105330.GB20709@latrappe.fr> References: <20110215105330.GB20709@latrappe.fr> Message-ID: Hie, I see what you meen. But has far as I know, the link between biblio and authorities is not managed during import (it would be quite difficult I think). Subfield 700$9 is considered as a normal data. You may find a script in Koha to synchronise the biblio fields with the existing authorities. If not, you'll have to create it. Maybe a SQL script is enought. Tell us if you suceed. Best regards, 2011/2/15 Fr?re S?bastien > Hello, > > As we obtain no reply for an inconsistent database, I will explain again > the problem, with SQL for examples. > > Currently, after using imported set of notices and using it we have the > following results: > > SELECT count(*) > FROM biblioitems > WHERE extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') != '' > AND extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') NOT IN ( > SELECT authid FROM auth_header ); > +----------+ > | count(*) | > +----------+ > | 121 | > +----------+ > > english-version: If I extract from MarcXML (on table biblioitems) the 700.9 > (Primary Author, koha_internal_code) and search in auth_header, we currently > have 121 items with no-existent 700.9 . > > This is only a part of the problem: some 700.9 are existent but wrong > (points to bad authority). > > SELECT count(*) > FROM biblioitems, auth_header > WHERE extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') = auth_header.authid > AND extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="a"]') != > extractvalue(auth_header.marcxml, > '/record/datafield[@tag="200"]/subfield[@code="a"]'); > +----------+ > | count(*) | > +----------+ > | 3 | > +----------+ > > Any suggestions ? This seems a bug (in import of notices where old > koha_internal_code is not removed), but I would prefered have your opinion > before submit a bugreport. > > And I will like some clues to correct the inconsitences ! > > Thanks. > > -- > Fr?re S?bastien Marie > Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe > 61380 Soligny-la-Trappe > T?l: 02.33.84.17.00 > Fax: 02.33.34.98.57 > Web: http://www.latrappe.fr/ > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:13:28PM +0100, Fr?re S?bastien Marie wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Recently, we have imported a set of notices, from another abbey, in > > the reservoir. > > > > When we create a new examplar using the previous imported notices, > > the field 700.9 (authority - internal koha number) refering the > > auth_id isn't updated or removed (still reference the old authority > > number, in the other catalog). > > > > As result, we have an examplar with 700.a (authority name) correct, > > but with an internal reference wrong (not valid in us catalog). > > > > If we search all notices linked with an authority, there is wrong > > attribution. > > > > Next an example. > > > > Starting with: > > - Notices in reservoir: > > - Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) [from import] > > > > - Authority in catalog: > > - Author_B (auth_id = 1) [created locally] > > > > - Notice in catalog: > > - Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > > > > > Next, we create a new examplar based on notice in reservoir, result: > > - Authority in catalog: > > - Author_B (auth_id = 1) [created locally] > > > > - Notice in catalog: > > - Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) > > - Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > > > (doubt if Author_A added in authorities or not) > > > > Now, if search notice attached with Author_B (auth_id = 1): > > results: > > - Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) > > - Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > > > The database is inconsistent. > > > > Where is the problem: > > - a misused of imported MARC: an option somewhere should be set... > > - a bug in importing MARC: 700.9 should be cleaned before import... > > - another possibility ? > > > > Currently, no bug report filled, as I don't no if it is a misusing > > or a bug. > > > > Thanks. > > -- > > Fr?re S?bastien Marie > > Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe > > 61380 Soligny-la-Trappe > > T?l: 02.33.84.17.00 > > Fax: 02.33.34.98.57 > > Web: http://www.latrappe.fr/ > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Fridolyn SOMERS ICT engineer PROGILONE - Lyon - France fridolyn.somers at gmail.com -------------- section suivante -------------- Une pi?ce jointe HTML a ?t? nettoy?e... URL: From fridolyn.somers at gmail.com Tue Feb 15 13:25:28 2011 From: fridolyn.somers at gmail.com (Fridolyn SOMERS) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:25:28 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Install hurdle, OpenSUSE on virtualbox In-Reply-To: References: <001f01cbc6d7$b4e55db0$1eb01910$@com> Message-ID: Hie, We also have problems with Win7 and VirtualBox (3.3 and 4). The most working mode for network is "bridge" : the network is used on guest like a new machine (new IP in DHCP). The problem is only when pc is not connected to a network. For your developers, we use Linux installed laptops. Best regards, On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Reed Wade wrote: > is getting slightly off the Koha topic but-- > > I tend to set up 2 network devices. One set for NAT and the other for > Host-Only. The NAT interface normally gets a 10.x.x.x address > (assigned via dhcp)and allows the guest OS to reach out to the outside > world and get software updates and for other outgoing things. The > Host-Only device normally gets a 192.x.x.x address assigned via dhcp > and is used to connect inbound from the host machine. > > -reed > > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Owen Leonard wrote: > >> Currently, my Windows 7 laptop can't see the apache LAMP > >> server on the OpenSUSE 11.3 virtualbox. > > > > This is not a problem with Koha installation, this is a problem with > > VirtualBox. I would recommend asking your question in their forum: > > > > http://forums.virtualbox.org/ > > > > Why not work on your Koha installation problems at the same time? Ask > > here about those while you're waiting to figure out your VirtualBox > > problems. > > > > -- Owen > > > > > > -- > > Web Developer > > Athens County Public Libraries > > http://www.myacpl.org > > _______________________________________________ > > Koha-devel mailing list > > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Fridolyn SOMERS ICT engineer PROGILONE - Lyon - France fridolyn.somers at gmail.com -------------- section suivante -------------- Une pi?ce jointe HTML a ?t? nettoy?e... URL: From henridamien.laurent at gmail.com Tue Feb 15 15:45:11 2011 From: henridamien.laurent at gmail.com (LAURENT Henri-Damien) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:45:11 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Workgroup on data persistence In-Reply-To: <20110208104259.5E0005028C@nail.towers.org.uk> References: <20110208104259.5E0005028C@nail.towers.org.uk> Message-ID: <4D5A9177.5000605@gmail.com> Le 08/02/2011 11:42, MJ Ray a ?crit : > LAURENT Henri-Damien >> So it is now time we make something about Data Persistance. >> Some tests have been done. >> Some results can be used. >> I propose we set some meeting next week any day in the morning between >> 8AM UTC to 12AM UTC. > > I would prefer Monday, Tuesday or Friday (strongly), 10-12 (weakly). > > Hope that helps, Since MJ was the only one to answer, let's set that on Friday, 10-12. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT From mjr at phonecoop.coop Tue Feb 15 15:45:55 2011 From: mjr at phonecoop.coop (MJ Ray) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:45:55 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Koha-devel] Devel list admin OK? was: [Koha] Vote for KohaCon 2011 In-Reply-To: <4D5A52DE.7090503@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20110215144555.55E9F5028C@nail.towers.org.uk> LAURENT Henri-Damien wrote: > Le 15/02/2011 10:37, MJ Ray a ?crit : > >> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 12:43:01 -0000 (UCT) > >> From: "Thomas Dukleth" > > [...] > >> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:32:02 +0100 > > > > 15-2 = 13 days. Does the devel list need more admins? > > > > Thanks, > Are you putting your name on that ? If the devel list needs more admins and there are no other volunteers, I would do it. I'd prefer someone to say clearly whether the list needs more admins because I would resign another moderation to make time. Does it? Hope that explains, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. Past Koha Release Manager (2.0), LMS programmer, statistician, webmaster. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire for Koha work http://www.software.coop/products/koha From chrisc at catalyst.net.nz Tue Feb 15 20:27:01 2011 From: chrisc at catalyst.net.nz (Chris Cormack) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:27:01 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Imported MARC notice and Authorities: : inconsistent database In-Reply-To: References: <20110215105330.GB20709@latrappe.fr> Message-ID: <20110215192701.GK27877@rorohiko> * Fridolyn SOMERS (fridolyn.somers at gmail.com) wrote: > Hie, > > I see what you meen. > > But has far as I know, the link between biblio and authorities is not > managed during import (it would be quite difficult I think). > Subfield 700$9 is considered as a normal data. > > You may find a script in Koha to synchronise the biblio fields with the > existing authorities. > If not, you'll have to create it. Maybe a SQL script is enought. > > Tell us if you suceed. Hi All There is a script in misc link_bibs_to_authorities.pl which should create the linkages for you Chris > > Best regards, > > 2011/2/15 Fr?re S?bastien <[1]semarie-koha at latrappe.fr> > > Hello, > > As we obtain no reply for an inconsistent database, I will explain again > the problem, with SQL for examples. > > Currently, after using imported set of notices and using it we have the > following results: > > SELECT count(*) > ?FROM biblioitems > ?WHERE extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') != '' > ? AND extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') NOT IN ( > ? ?SELECT authid FROM auth_header ); > +----------+ > | count(*) | > +----------+ > | ? ? ?121 | > +----------+ > > english-version: If I extract from MarcXML (on table biblioitems) the > 700.9 (Primary Author, koha_internal_code) and search in auth_header, we > currently have 121 items with no-existent 700.9 . > > This is only a part of the problem: some 700.9 are existent but wrong > (points to bad authority). > > SELECT count(*) > ?FROM biblioitems, auth_header > ?WHERE extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') = > auth_header.authid > ? AND extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="a"]') != > extractvalue(auth_header.marcxml, > '/record/datafield[@tag="200"]/subfield[@code="a"]'); > +----------+ > | count(*) | > +----------+ > | ? ? ? ?3 | > +----------+ > > Any suggestions ? This seems a bug (in import of notices where old > koha_internal_code is not removed), but I would prefered have your > opinion before submit a bugreport. > > And I will like some clues to correct the inconsitences ! > Thanks. > > -- > Fr?re S?bastien Marie > Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe > 61380 Soligny-la-Trappe > T?l: 02.33.84.17.00 > Fax: 02.33.34.98.57 > Web: [2]http://www.latrappe.fr/ > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:13:28PM +0100, Fr?re S?bastien Marie wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Recently, we have imported a set of notices, from another abbey, in > > the reservoir. > > > > When we create a new examplar using the previous imported notices, > > the field 700.9 (authority - internal koha number) refering the > > auth_id isn't updated or removed (still reference the old authority > > number, in the other catalog). > > > > As result, we have an examplar with 700.a (authority name) correct, > > but with an internal reference wrong (not valid in us catalog). > > > > If we search all notices linked with an authority, there is wrong > > attribution. > > > > Next an example. > > > > Starting with: > > ?- Notices in reservoir: > > ? ?- Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) [from import] > > > > ?- Authority in catalog: > > ? ?- Author_B (auth_id = 1) [created locally] > > > > ?- Notice in catalog: > > ? ?- Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > > > > > Next, we create a new examplar based on notice in reservoir, result: > > ?- Authority in catalog: > > ? ?- Author_B (auth_id = 1) [created locally] > > > > ?- Notice in catalog: > > ? ?- Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) > > ? ?- Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > > > (doubt if Author_A added in authorities or not) > > > > Now, if search notice attached with Author_B (auth_id = 1): > > ?results: > > ? - Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) > > ? - Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > > > The database is inconsistent. > > > > Where is the problem: > > ?- a misused of imported MARC: an option somewhere should be set... > > ?- a bug in importing MARC: 700.9 should be cleaned before import... > > ?- another possibility ? > > > > Currently, no bug report filled, as I don't no if it is a misusing > > or a bug. > > > > Thanks. > > -- > > Fr?re S?bastien Marie > > Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe > > 61380 Soligny-la-Trappe > > T?l: 02.33.84.17.00 > > Fax: 02.33.34.98.57 > > Web: [3]http://www.latrappe.fr/ > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > [4]Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > [5]http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : [6]http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : [7]http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : [8]http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > > -- > Fridolyn SOMERS > ICT engineer > PROGILONE - Lyon - France > [9]fridolyn.somers at gmail.com > > References > > Visible links > 1. mailto:semarie-koha at latrappe.fr > 2. http://www.latrappe.fr/ > 3. http://www.latrappe.fr/ > 4. mailto:Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > 5. http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > 6. http://www.koha-community.org/ > 7. http://git.koha-community.org/ > 8. http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > 9. mailto:fridolyn.somers at gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -- Chris Cormack Catalyst IT Ltd. +64 4 803 2238 PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington 6142, New Zealand -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From reedwade at gmail.com Tue Feb 15 20:39:16 2011 From: reedwade at gmail.com (Reed Wade) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:39:16 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Install hurdle, OpenSUSE on virtualbox In-Reply-To: References: <001f01cbc6d7$b4e55db0$1eb01910$@com> Message-ID: In bridge mode the virtual machine will be looking your machine for address assignment via DHCP so -- I would expect taking it off the network to cause trouble. -reed On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Fridolyn SOMERS wrote: > Hie, > > We also have problems with Win7 and VirtualBox (3.3 and 4). > The most working mode for network is "bridge" : the network is used on guest > like a new machine (new IP in DHCP). > The problem is only when pc is not connected to a network. > > For your developers, we use Linux installed laptops. > > Best regards, > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Reed Wade wrote: >> >> is getting slightly off the Koha topic but-- >> >> I tend to set up 2 network devices. One set for NAT and the other for >> Host-Only. The NAT interface normally gets a 10.x.x.x address >> (assigned via dhcp)and allows the guest OS to reach out to the outside >> world and get software updates and for other outgoing things. The >> Host-Only device normally gets a 192.x.x.x address assigned via dhcp >> and is used to connect inbound from the host machine. >> >> -reed >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Owen Leonard wrote: >> >> Currently, my Windows 7 laptop can't see the apache LAMP >> >> server on the OpenSUSE 11.3 virtualbox. >> > >> > This is not a problem with Koha installation, this is a problem with >> > VirtualBox. I would recommend asking your question in their forum: >> > >> > http://forums.virtualbox.org/ >> > >> > Why not work on your Koha installation problems at the same time? Ask >> > here about those while you're waiting to figure out your VirtualBox >> > problems. >> > >> > ?-- Owen >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Web Developer >> > Athens County Public Libraries >> > http://www.myacpl.org >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Koha-devel mailing list >> > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > > > > -- > Fridolyn SOMERS > ICT engineer > PROGILONE - Lyon - France > fridolyn.somers at gmail.com > From reedwade at gmail.com Tue Feb 15 20:39:58 2011 From: reedwade at gmail.com (Reed Wade) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:39:58 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Install hurdle, OpenSUSE on virtualbox In-Reply-To: References: <001f01cbc6d7$b4e55db0$1eb01910$@com> Message-ID: sorry-- "...looking beyond your machine..." On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Reed Wade wrote: > In bridge mode the virtual machine will be looking your machine for > address assignment via DHCP so -- I would expect taking it off the > network to cause trouble. > > -reed > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Fridolyn SOMERS > wrote: >> Hie, >> >> We also have problems with Win7 and VirtualBox (3.3 and 4). >> The most working mode for network is "bridge" : the network is used on guest >> like a new machine (new IP in DHCP). >> The problem is only when pc is not connected to a network. >> >> For your developers, we use Linux installed laptops. >> >> Best regards, >> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Reed Wade wrote: >>> >>> is getting slightly off the Koha topic but-- >>> >>> I tend to set up 2 network devices. One set for NAT and the other for >>> Host-Only. The NAT interface normally gets a 10.x.x.x address >>> (assigned via dhcp)and allows the guest OS to reach out to the outside >>> world and get software updates and for other outgoing things. The >>> Host-Only device normally gets a 192.x.x.x address assigned via dhcp >>> and is used to connect inbound from the host machine. >>> >>> -reed >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Owen Leonard wrote: >>> >> Currently, my Windows 7 laptop can't see the apache LAMP >>> >> server on the OpenSUSE 11.3 virtualbox. >>> > >>> > This is not a problem with Koha installation, this is a problem with >>> > VirtualBox. I would recommend asking your question in their forum: >>> > >>> > http://forums.virtualbox.org/ >>> > >>> > Why not work on your Koha installation problems at the same time? Ask >>> > here about those while you're waiting to figure out your VirtualBox >>> > problems. >>> > >>> > ?-- Owen >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Web Developer >>> > Athens County Public Libraries >>> > http://www.myacpl.org >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Koha-devel mailing list >>> > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>> > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>> > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>> > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>> > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Koha-devel mailing list >>> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >>> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >>> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >>> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >>> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ >> >> >> >> -- >> Fridolyn SOMERS >> ICT engineer >> PROGILONE - Lyon - France >> fridolyn.somers at gmail.com >> > From fridolyn.somers at gmail.com Wed Feb 16 08:47:22 2011 From: fridolyn.somers at gmail.com (Fridolyn SOMERS) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 08:47:22 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Imported MARC notice and Authorities: : inconsistent database In-Reply-To: <20110215192701.GK27877@rorohiko> References: <20110215105330.GB20709@latrappe.fr> <20110215192701.GK27877@rorohiko> Message-ID: Hie, Thanks for the solution. I have a question : In this script, it seems that if the authority is changed, the items are deleted : # delete any item tags my ($itemtag, $itemsubfield) = GetMarcFromKohaField("items.itemnumber", ''); foreach my $field ($bib->field($itemtag)) { $bib->delete_field($field); } Why is that ? Regards, 2011/2/15 Chris Cormack > * Fridolyn SOMERS (fridolyn.somers at gmail.com) wrote: > > Hie, > > > > I see what you meen. > > > > But has far as I know, the link between biblio and authorities is not > > managed during import (it would be quite difficult I think). > > Subfield 700$9 is considered as a normal data. > > > > You may find a script in Koha to synchronise the biblio fields with > the > > existing authorities. > > If not, you'll have to create it. Maybe a SQL script is enought. > > > > Tell us if you suceed. > > Hi All > > There is a script in misc link_bibs_to_authorities.pl which should > create the linkages for you > > Chris > > > > > Best regards, > > > > 2011/2/15 Fr?re S?bastien <[1]semarie-koha at latrappe.fr> > > > > Hello, > > > > As we obtain no reply for an inconsistent database, I will explain > again > > the problem, with SQL for examples. > > > > Currently, after using imported set of notices and using it we have > the > > following results: > > > > SELECT count(*) > > ?FROM biblioitems > > ?WHERE extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > > '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') != '' > > ? AND extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > > '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') NOT IN ( > > ? ?SELECT authid FROM auth_header ); > > +----------+ > > | count(*) | > > +----------+ > > | ? ? ?121 | > > +----------+ > > > > english-version: If I extract from MarcXML (on table biblioitems) > the > > 700.9 (Primary Author, koha_internal_code) and search in > auth_header, we > > currently have 121 items with no-existent 700.9 . > > > > This is only a part of the problem: some 700.9 are existent but > wrong > > (points to bad authority). > > > > SELECT count(*) > > ?FROM biblioitems, auth_header > > ?WHERE extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > > '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') = > > auth_header.authid > > ? AND extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > > '/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="a"]') != > > extractvalue(auth_header.marcxml, > > '/record/datafield[@tag="200"]/subfield[@code="a"]'); > > +----------+ > > | count(*) | > > +----------+ > > | ? ? ? ?3 | > > +----------+ > > > > Any suggestions ? This seems a bug (in import of notices where old > > koha_internal_code is not removed), but I would prefered have your > > opinion before submit a bugreport. > > > > And I will like some clues to correct the inconsitences ! > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > Fr?re S?bastien Marie > > Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe > > 61380 Soligny-la-Trappe > > T?l: 02.33.84.17.00 > > Fax: 02.33.34.98.57 > > Web: [2]http://www.latrappe.fr/ > > > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:13:28PM +0100, Fr?re S?bastien Marie > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Recently, we have imported a set of notices, from another abbey, > in > > > the reservoir. > > > > > > When we create a new examplar using the previous imported notices, > > > the field 700.9 (authority - internal koha number) refering the > > > auth_id isn't updated or removed (still reference the old > authority > > > number, in the other catalog). > > > > > > As result, we have an examplar with 700.a (authority name) > correct, > > > but with an internal reference wrong (not valid in us catalog). > > > > > > If we search all notices linked with an authority, there is wrong > > > attribution. > > > > > > Next an example. > > > > > > Starting with: > > > ?- Notices in reservoir: > > > ? ?- Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) [from import] > > > > > > ?- Authority in catalog: > > > ? ?- Author_B (auth_id = 1) [created locally] > > > > > > ?- Notice in catalog: > > > ? ?- Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > > > > > > > > Next, we create a new examplar based on notice in reservoir, > result: > > > ?- Authority in catalog: > > > ? ?- Author_B (auth_id = 1) [created locally] > > > > > > ?- Notice in catalog: > > > ? ?- Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) > > > ? ?- Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > > > > > (doubt if Author_A added in authorities or not) > > > > > > Now, if search notice attached with Author_B (auth_id = 1): > > > ?results: > > > ? - Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) > > > ? - Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > > > > > The database is inconsistent. > > > > > > Where is the problem: > > > ?- a misused of imported MARC: an option somewhere should be > set... > > > ?- a bug in importing MARC: 700.9 should be cleaned before > import... > > > ?- another possibility ? > > > > > > Currently, no bug report filled, as I don't no if it is a misusing > > > or a bug. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > -- > > > Fr?re S?bastien Marie > > > Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe > > > 61380 Soligny-la-Trappe > > > T?l: 02.33.84.17.00 > > > Fax: 02.33.34.98.57 > > > Web: [3]http://www.latrappe.fr/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Koha-devel mailing list > > [4]Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > > [5] > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > > website : [6]http://www.koha-community.org/ > > git : [7]http://git.koha-community.org/ > > bugs : [8]http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > > > > -- > > Fridolyn SOMERS > > ICT engineer > > PROGILONE - Lyon - France > > [9]fridolyn.somers at gmail.com > > > > References > > > > Visible links > > 1. mailto:semarie-koha at latrappe.fr > > 2. http://www.latrappe.fr/ > > 3. http://www.latrappe.fr/ > > 4. mailto:Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > > 5. > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > > 6. http://www.koha-community.org/ > > 7. http://git.koha-community.org/ > > 8. http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > > 9. mailto:fridolyn.somers at gmail.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > Koha-devel mailing list > > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > > > -- > Chris Cormack > Catalyst IT Ltd. > +64 4 803 2238 > PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington 6142, New Zealand > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAk1a04UACgkQZgbcHEvgMLP8wgCgk+uADfW1pIdH4bg3NqhRJBy4 > VEkAmgLTX84coNwkJT7j18YgXV2OOiCt > =3N0Z > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- Fridolyn SOMERS ICT engineer PROGILONE - Lyon - France fridolyn.somers at gmail.com -------------- section suivante -------------- Une pi?ce jointe HTML a ?t? nettoy?e... URL: From chrisc at catalyst.net.nz Wed Feb 16 09:02:28 2011 From: chrisc at catalyst.net.nz (Chris Cormack) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:02:28 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Imported MARC notice and Authorities: : inconsistent database In-Reply-To: References: <20110215105330.GB20709@latrappe.fr> <20110215192701.GK27877@rorohiko> Message-ID: <20110216080228.GX27877@rorohiko> * Fridolyn SOMERS (fridolyn.somers at gmail.com) wrote: > Hie, > > Thanks for the solution. > > I have a question : > In this script, it seems that if the authority is changed, the items are > deleted : > ??????????? # delete any item tags > ??????????? my ($itemtag, $itemsubfield) = > GetMarcFromKohaField("items.itemnumber", ''); > ??????????? foreach my $field ($bib->field($itemtag)) { > ??????????????? $bib->delete_field($field); > ??????????? } > > Why is that ? Hi Fridolyn http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=2258 If you want to know more check out commit 6858da97c361fe9a5fddfed7c6d9b1103b27dca0 The commit message is bug 2258 - do not duplicate embedded items If a MARC bib is modified by this batch job, do not duplicate the item tags embedded in it (e.g., 952 for MARC21). When modifying a bib record, any embedded item tags must be removed before calling ModBiblio - perhaps this should be moved to ModBiblio itself. Also removed an error in the job's help text. FYI I found this information using git blame. Chris > > Regards, > > 2011/2/15 Chris Cormack <[1]chrisc at catalyst.net.nz> > > * Fridolyn SOMERS ([2]fridolyn.somers at gmail.com) wrote: > > ? ?Hie, > > > > ? ?I see what you meen. > > > > ? ?But has far as I know, the link between biblio and authorities is > not > > ? ?managed during import (it would be quite difficult I think). > > ? ?Subfield 700$9 is considered as a normal data. > > > > ? ?You may find a script in Koha to synchronise the biblio fields with > the > > ? ?existing authorities. > > ? ?If not, you'll have to create it. Maybe a SQL script is enought. > > > > ? ?Tell us if you suceed. > > Hi All > > There is a script in misc [3]link_bibs_to_authorities.pl which should > create the linkages for you > > Chris > > > > > ? ?Best regards, > > > > ? ?2011/2/15 Fr?re S?bastien <[1][4]semarie-koha at latrappe.fr> > > > > ? ? ?Hello, > > > > ? ? ?As we obtain no reply for an inconsistent database, I will > explain again > > ? ? ?the problem, with SQL for examples. > > > > ? ? ?Currently, after using imported set of notices and using it we > have the > > ? ? ?following results: > > > > ? ? ?SELECT count(*) > > ? ? ??FROM biblioitems > > ? ? ??WHERE extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > > ? ? ?'/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') != '' > > ? ? ?? AND extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > > ? ? ?'/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') NOT IN ( > > ? ? ?? ?SELECT authid FROM auth_header ); > > ? ? ?+----------+ > > ? ? ?| count(*) | > > ? ? ?+----------+ > > ? ? ?| ? ? ?121 | > > ? ? ?+----------+ > > > > ? ? ?english-version: If I extract from MarcXML (on table biblioitems) > the > > ? ? ?700.9 (Primary Author, koha_internal_code) and search in > auth_header, we > > ? ? ?currently have 121 items with no-existent 700.9 . > > > > ? ? ?This is only a part of the problem: some 700.9 are existent but > wrong > > ? ? ?(points to bad authority). > > > > ? ? ?SELECT count(*) > > ? ? ??FROM biblioitems, auth_header > > ? ? ??WHERE extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > > ? ? ?'/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="9"]') = > > ? ? ?auth_header.authid > > ? ? ?? AND extractvalue(biblioitems.marcxml, > > ? ? ?'/record/datafield[@tag="700"]/subfield[@code="a"]') != > > ? ? ?extractvalue(auth_header.marcxml, > > ? ? ?'/record/datafield[@tag="200"]/subfield[@code="a"]'); > > ? ? ?+----------+ > > ? ? ?| count(*) | > > ? ? ?+----------+ > > ? ? ?| ? ? ? ?3 | > > ? ? ?+----------+ > > > > ? ? ?Any suggestions ? This seems a bug (in import of notices where > old > > ? ? ?koha_internal_code is not removed), but I would prefered have > your > > ? ? ?opinion before submit a bugreport. > > > > ? ? ?And I will like some clues to correct the inconsitences ! > > ? ? ?Thanks. > > > > ? ? ?-- > > ? ? ?Fr?re S?bastien Marie > > ? ? ?Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe > > ? ? ?61380 Soligny-la-Trappe > > ? ? ?T?l: 02.33.84.17.00 > > ? ? ?Fax: 02.33.34.98.57 > > ? ? ?Web: [2][5]http://www.latrappe.fr/ > > > > ? ? ?On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:13:28PM +0100, Fr?re S?bastien Marie > wrote: > > ? ? ?> Hello, > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> Recently, we have imported a set of notices, from another > abbey, in > > ? ? ?> the reservoir. > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> When we create a new examplar using the previous imported > notices, > > ? ? ?> the field 700.9 (authority - internal koha number) refering the > > ? ? ?> auth_id isn't updated or removed (still reference the old > authority > > ? ? ?> number, in the other catalog). > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> As result, we have an examplar with 700.a (authority name) > correct, > > ? ? ?> but with an internal reference wrong (not valid in us catalog). > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> If we search all notices linked with an authority, there is > wrong > > ? ? ?> attribution. > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> Next an example. > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> Starting with: > > ? ? ?> ?- Notices in reservoir: > > ? ? ?> ? ?- Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) [from import] > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> ?- Authority in catalog: > > ? ? ?> ? ?- Author_B (auth_id = 1) [created locally] > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> ?- Notice in catalog: > > ? ? ?> ? ?- Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> Next, we create a new examplar based on notice in reservoir, > result: > > ? ? ?> ?- Authority in catalog: > > ? ? ?> ? ?- Author_B (auth_id = 1) [created locally] > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> ?- Notice in catalog: > > ? ? ?> ? ?- Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) > > ? ? ?> ? ?- Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> (doubt if Author_A added in authorities or not) > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> Now, if search notice attached with Author_B (auth_id = 1): > > ? ? ?> ?results: > > ? ? ?> ? - Title_A / Author_A (auth_id = 1) > > ? ? ?> ? - Title_B / Author_B (auth_id = 1) > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> The database is inconsistent. > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> Where is the problem: > > ? ? ?> ?- a misused of imported MARC: an option somewhere should be > set... > > ? ? ?> ?- a bug in importing MARC: 700.9 should be cleaned before > import... > > ? ? ?> ?- another possibility ? > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> Currently, no bug report filled, as I don't no if it is a > misusing > > ? ? ?> or a bug. > > ? ? ?> > > ? ? ?> Thanks. > > ? ? ?> -- > > ? ? ?> Fr?re S?bastien Marie > > ? ? ?> Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe > > ? ? ?> 61380 Soligny-la-Trappe > > ? ? ?> T?l: 02.33.84.17.00 > > ? ? ?> Fax: 02.33.34.98.57 > > ? ? ?> Web: [3][6]http://www.latrappe.fr/ > > ? ? ?_______________________________________________ > > ? ? ?Koha-devel mailing list > > ? ? ?[4][7]Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > > ? ? > ?[5][8]http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > > ? ? ?website : [6][9]http://www.koha-community.org/ > > ? ? ?git : [7][10]http://git.koha-community.org/ > > ? ? ?bugs : [8][11]http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > > > > ? ?-- > > ? ?Fridolyn SOMERS > > ? ?ICT engineer > > ? ?PROGILONE - Lyon - France > > ? ?[9][12]fridolyn.somers at gmail.com > > > > References > > > > ? ?Visible links > > ? ?1. mailto:[13]semarie-koha at latrappe.fr > > ? ?2. [14]http://www.latrappe.fr/ > > ? ?3. [15]http://www.latrappe.fr/ > > ? ?4. mailto:[16]Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > > ? ?5. > [17]http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > > ? ?6. [18]http://www.koha-community.org/ > > ? ?7. [19]http://git.koha-community.org/ > > ? ?8. [20]http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > > ? ?9. mailto:[21]fridolyn.somers at gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Koha-devel mailing list > > [22]Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > > > [23]http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > > website : [24]http://www.koha-community.org/ > > git : [25]http://git.koha-community.org/ > > bugs : [26]http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > > -- > Chris Cormack > Catalyst IT Ltd. > [27]+64 4 803 2238 > PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington 6142, New Zealand > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAk1a04UACgkQZgbcHEvgMLP8wgCgk+uADfW1pIdH4bg3NqhRJBy4 > VEkAmgLTX84coNwkJT7j18YgXV2OOiCt > =3N0Z > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- > Fridolyn SOMERS > ICT engineer > PROGILONE - Lyon - France > [28]fridolyn.somers at gmail.com > > References > > Visible links > 1. mailto:chrisc at catalyst.net.nz > 2. mailto:fridolyn.somers at gmail.com > 3. http://link_bibs_to_authorities.pl/ > 4. mailto:semarie-koha at latrappe.fr > 5. http://www.latrappe.fr/ > 6. http://www.latrappe.fr/ > 7. mailto:Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > 8. http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > 9. http://www.koha-community.org/ > 10. http://git.koha-community.org/ > 11. http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > 12. mailto:fridolyn.somers at gmail.com > 13. mailto:semarie-koha at latrappe.fr > 14. http://www.latrappe.fr/ > 15. http://www.latrappe.fr/ > 16. mailto:Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > 17. http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > 18. http://www.koha-community.org/ > 19. http://git.koha-community.org/ > 20. http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > 21. mailto:fridolyn.somers at gmail.com > 22. mailto:Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > 23. http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > 24. http://www.koha-community.org/ > 25. http://git.koha-community.org/ > 26. http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > 27. file:///tmp/tel:%2B64%204%20803%202238 > 28. mailto:fridolyn.somers at gmail.com -- Chris Cormack Catalyst IT Ltd. +64 4 803 2238 PO Box 11-053, Manners St, Wellington 6142, New Zealand -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: From semarie-koha at latrappe.fr Wed Feb 16 09:08:29 2011 From: semarie-koha at latrappe.fr (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E8re_S=E9bastien?= Marie) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:08:29 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Imported MARC notice and Authorities: : inconsistent database In-Reply-To: References: <20110215105330.GB20709@latrappe.fr> Message-ID: <20110216080829.GH20709@latrappe.fr> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:44:22PM +0100, Fridolyn SOMERS wrote: > > But has far as I know, the link between biblio and authorities is not > managed during import (it would be quite difficult I think). > Subfield 700$9 is considered as a normal data. I think a better behavior should be to strip 700$9 (in the export stage, where its known unambigiously that 700$9 is really the koha_internal_number) ? Its resolv inconsistences in the import stage (no reference to a wrong authority), and should simplify future relinking. > > You may find a script in Koha to synchronise the biblio fields with the > existing authorities. > If not, you'll have to create it. Maybe a SQL script is enought. > misc/link_bibs_to_authorities.pl should be the right (thanks Chris), but it failed with UNIMARC flavour... $ ./link_bibs_to_authorities.pl --test --verbose Can't locate object method "new" via package "C4::Heading::UNIMARC" (perhaps you forgot to load "C4::Heading::UNIMARC"?) at /srv/koha/koha-git-tree/C4/Heading.pm line 168. In my repository, there is no "C4/Heading/UNIMARC.pm" ... only "C4/Heading/MARC21.pm". But "C4/Heading.pm" refers to C4::Heading::UNIMARC . ----- BEGIN C4/Heading.pm: lines 164-173 ----- sub _marc_format_handler { my $marcflavour = shift; if ($marcflavour eq 'UNIMARC') { return C4::Heading::UNIMARC->new(); } else { return C4::Heading::MARC21->new(); } } ----- END C4/Heading.pm ----- And I can't verify against the git tree (git.koha-community.org seem currently hanged: ping ok, connect 80 ok, but no responses from server), but my current version its from Jan 6, 2011 , and the _marc_format_handler function dated to 2008 (date based with git blame) : so I think ok, but its lacks UNIMARC support for ./link_bibs_to_authorities.pl . > Tell us if you suceed. Working progress... Thanks. -- Fr?re S?bastien Marie Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe 61380 Soligny-la-Trappe T?l: 02.33.84.17.00 Fax: 02.33.34.98.57 Web: http://www.latrappe.fr/ From kohadevel at agogme.com Wed Feb 16 11:54:03 2011 From: kohadevel at agogme.com (Thomas Dukleth) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:54:03 -0000 (UCT) Subject: [Koha-devel] SimpleServer using Solr progress In-Reply-To: <35132216e858a2e00a6b966fa9552380.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> References: <4D510CE4.70409@biblibre.com> <4ef2c1d826b8ef42ff870d0fba44be54.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> <4D54EFE5.2070403@biblibre.com> <02ac1f4ee319671a732cc1440d28be21.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> <4D550BB2.1090801@gmail.com> <35132216e858a2e00a6b966fa9552380.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> Message-ID: <439451ef82533d45c001261e04ffc069.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> [Original subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Solr and Z3950 server some news.] 1. YAZ CONFIGURATION. SimpleServer, like all IndexData products is dependent upon YAZ. My thought on the bad MARC error from testing BibLibre work on SimpleServer as a Z39.50/SRU server using Solr/Lucene is that the record syntax/schema serialisation is not working correctly because no GFS configuration file has been specified for YAZ. A SimpleServer implementation without a configuration file for YAZ would lack CQL to PQF conversion, Explain support, etc. The built in defaults seem to be insufficient for proper record syntax/schema serialisation. SimpleServer can be started with the -f option to specify a GFS configuration file for YAZ, http://www.indexdata.com/yaz/doc/server.vhosts.html . YAZ retrieval facility documentation, http://www.indexdata.com/yaz/doc/tools.retrieval.html , is needed to help understand serialisation for the GFS configuration file. Z39.50 object identifiers (OIDs) are listed at http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/defns/oids.html . A YAZ GFS configuration example is in etc/yazgfs.xml in the YAZ source code. Other needed configuration files such as pqf.properties, cqlpass.properties, and maps.xml are linked from yazgfs.xml. In Koha, the YAZ GFS configuration file is etc/koha-conf.xml which links to other files, such as etc/zebradb/explain-biblios.xml, and differently named files, such as etc/zebradb/cql.properties. The Koha examples have several mistakes and omissions including the following. Generic XML might include MARCXML and Dublin Core along with any other XML schema , therefore, generic XML should not be conflated with MARCXML which have distinctive serialisations. UNIMARC and USMARC are distinctive and having UNIMARC use USMARC defaults causes confusion and may lead to bugs. There are other mistakes and omissions for Koha YAZ configuration but those seem most relevant to BibLibre's current work on SimpleServer. The ambiguity of the Z39.50 standard over whether records from the result set would need to be retrieved again from the server for the present command if they had already been retrieved as part of the response to the search command complicates my understanding of what may be happening on the server and client side when using the present command. YAZ behaviour is expected to parse MARCXML records in a distinctive MARC formatted manner also used to parse ISO 2709 records when the present command is issued. In the current state of work on SimpleServer, with the apparent absence of proper serialisation, the present command returns incompletely parsed MARC records. YAZ does not attempt parsing for generic XML. Saving MARCXML in raw format would avoid the MARC parsing from present. 2. INVARIANT RESULT SET. A more important problem remains that any SimpleServer query has been returning exactly the same result set whether or not there would be any legitimate matches. 1011 records had always been returned on when I tested on Friday. 1027 records were always being returned when I tested on Monday. 3. DIRECTION FOR NOW. I hope that my testing and direction to a possible solution has been helpful to people working on SimpleServer using Solr/Lucene at BibLibre. As much fun as more actively helping to fix the problems would be, I have to return to some non-library commitments presently. Thomas Dukleth Agogme 109 E 9th Street, 3D New York, NY 10003 USA http://www.agogme.com +1 212-674-3783 From henridamien.laurent at gmail.com Wed Feb 16 12:27:38 2011 From: henridamien.laurent at gmail.com (LAURENT Henri-Damien) Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:27:38 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] SimpleServer using Solr progress In-Reply-To: <439451ef82533d45c001261e04ffc069.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> References: <4D510CE4.70409@biblibre.com> <4ef2c1d826b8ef42ff870d0fba44be54.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> <4D54EFE5.2070403@biblibre.com> <02ac1f4ee319671a732cc1440d28be21.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> <4D550BB2.1090801@gmail.com> <35132216e858a2e00a6b966fa9552380.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> <439451ef82533d45c001261e04ffc069.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> Message-ID: <4D5BB4AA.3080502@gmail.com> Le 16/02/2011 11:54, Thomas Dukleth a ?crit : > [Original subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Solr and Z3950 server some news.] > > > 1. YAZ CONFIGURATION. > > SimpleServer, like all IndexData products is dependent upon YAZ. > > My thought on the bad MARC error from testing BibLibre work on > SimpleServer as a Z39.50/SRU server using Solr/Lucene is that the record > syntax/schema serialisation is not working correctly because no GFS > configuration file has been specified for YAZ. A SimpleServer > implementation without a configuration file for YAZ would lack CQL to PQF > conversion, Explain support, etc. The built in defaults seem to be > insufficient for proper record syntax/schema serialisation. > > SimpleServer can be started with the -f option to specify a GFS > configuration file for YAZ, > http://www.indexdata.com/yaz/doc/server.vhosts.html . YAZ retrieval > facility documentation, > http://www.indexdata.com/yaz/doc/tools.retrieval.html , is needed to help > understand serialisation for the GFS configuration file. Z39.50 object > identifiers (OIDs) are listed at > http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/defns/oids.html . > > A YAZ GFS configuration example is in etc/yazgfs.xml in the YAZ source > code. Other needed configuration files such as pqf.properties, > cqlpass.properties, and maps.xml are linked from yazgfs.xml. In Koha, the > YAZ GFS configuration file is etc/koha-conf.xml which links to other > files, such as etc/zebradb/explain-biblios.xml, and differently named > files, such as etc/zebradb/cql.properties. > > The Koha examples have several mistakes and omissions including the > following. Generic XML might include MARCXML and Dublin Core along with > any other XML schema , therefore, generic XML should not be conflated > with MARCXML which have distinctive serialisations. UNIMARC and USMARC > are distinctive and having UNIMARC use USMARC defaults causes confusion > and may lead to bugs. There are other mistakes and omissions for Koha YAZ > configuration but those seem most relevant to BibLibre's current work on > SimpleServer. > > The ambiguity of the Z39.50 standard over whether records from the result > set would need to be retrieved again from the server for the present > command if they had already been retrieved as part of the response to the > search command complicates my understanding of what may be happening on > the server and client side when using the present command. YAZ behaviour > is expected to parse MARCXML records in a distinctive MARC formatted > manner also used to parse ISO 2709 records when the present command is > issued. In the current state of work on SimpleServer, with the apparent > absence of proper serialisation, the present command returns incompletely > parsed MARC records. YAZ does not attempt parsing for generic XML. > Saving MARCXML in raw format would avoid the MARC parsing from present. > Many thanks for your time invested, your feedback and thoughtfull hints. We will try and get things out of this. And we will try adding a yaz xml file and make that file used in the SimpleServer. > > 2. INVARIANT RESULT SET. > > A more important problem remains that any SimpleServer query has been > returning exactly the same result set whether or not there would be any > legitimate matches. 1011 records had always been returned on when I > tested on Friday. 1027 records were always being returned when I tested > on Monday. I think this problem comes from the fact that whatever the query is, if there is no answer possible, we are exposing the whole lot. > > > 3. DIRECTION FOR NOW. > > I hope that my testing and direction to a possible solution has been > helpful to people working on SimpleServer using Solr/Lucene at BibLibre. > As much fun as more actively helping to fix the problems would be, I have > to return to some non-library commitments presently. > Thanks Thomas. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT From nengard at gmail.com Thu Feb 17 14:18:53 2011 From: nengard at gmail.com (Nicole Engard) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:18:53 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] KohaCon 2011 : The Votes Are In Message-ID: Hello all, The KohaCon 2011 Location Survey is closed. We had a total of 877 responses. If you voted for a location as your first choice it got 4 points, your second choice 3 points, and so on. Below is the break down in points. ** Thane, India [ End October - Beginning November ] 2640+150+62+33= 2885 ** Kathmandu, Nepal [ November / December 2011 ] 432+96+186+24= 738 Kolkata, India [ November / December 2011 ] 156+339+104+33= 632 Somerset or Bristol, UK [ September / October 2011 ] 160+141+72+108 = 481 The raw results will be posted to the wiki (I can't upload a CSV file - I need some admin help). I do want to know what your opinions are about posting the full CSV file to the wiki - it does have all our email addresses. I might remove that column before posting if enough people express a concern about that or just email the CSV to those who want to see the raw results and not worry about posting it publicly at all. Even if we ignore votes from those who didn't fill in all the information I'm pretty sure we have a winner. Thanks Nicole C. Engard PS. I recommend that we soon move on to voting for the location for 2012 so that we can get on top of things and conference planners have more time to prepare. From gmcharlt at gmail.com Thu Feb 17 14:39:04 2011 From: gmcharlt at gmail.com (Galen Charlton) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 08:39:04 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] KohaCon 2011 : The Votes Are In In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Nicole Engard wrote: > The raw results will be posted to the wiki (I can't upload a CSV file > - I need some admin help). I do want to know what your opinions are > about posting the full CSV file to the wiki - it does have all our > email addresses. ?I might remove that column before posting if enough > people express a concern about that or just email the CSV to those who > want to see the raw results and not worry about posting it publicly at > all. I prefer that we not post the version with the email addresses publicly. It can be made available on request if a question arises. Congratulations to the organizers of the Thane bid - I look forward to Koha 2011 in Thane, India. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton gmcharlt at gmail.com From M.de.Rooy at rijksmuseum.nl Thu Feb 17 15:24:38 2011 From: M.de.Rooy at rijksmuseum.nl (Marcel de Rooy) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:24:38 +0000 Subject: [Koha-devel] zebra / Heading-Main Message-ID: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA311DFFBF@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> Hi, Some time ago Heading-Main was introduced in both authorities and biblios record.abs in marc_defs/marc21 and marc_defs/unimarc. Apparently, it was added to extend authority search with the option to search only in 100a, 110a, .. fields. But Heading-Main is not listed in one the attsets (bib1,..) This gives the warning: zebraidx(18056) [warn] Index 'Heading-Main' not found in attset(s) This bug was reported March 2009 (!) under: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3072 Related reports are: 3052, 3386 and 3429. We still have the following temporary fix in AuthoritiesMarc.pm : ##If mainentry search $a tag if (@$tags[$i] eq "mainmainentry") { # FIXME: 'Heading-Main' index not yet defined in zebra # $attr =" \@attr 1=Heading-Main "; $attr =" \@attr 1=Heading "; Would anyone of you object against defining a new 8XXX field in authorities bib1.att to activate Heading-Main and at the same time fixing AuthoritiesMarc.pm ? We now have there: att 8001 Heading att 8002 See-from att 8003 See-also-from att 8804 Match-heading att 8805 Match-subdivision att 8806 Subdivision att 8807 Subdivision-see-also-from att 8808 Subdivision-see-from att 8809 Match-heading-see-from att 8810 Match-subdivision-see-from BTW, an interesting way of incrementing from 8001 to 8810? We could add 8004 for Heading-Main ? Better idea? Regards, Marcel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From M.de.Rooy at rijksmuseum.nl Thu Feb 17 15:39:04 2011 From: M.de.Rooy at rijksmuseum.nl (Marcel de Rooy) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:39:04 +0000 Subject: [Koha-devel] FW: zebra / Heading-Main Message-ID: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA311E0262@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> Only in authorities.. Van: koha-devel-bounces at lists.koha-community.org [mailto:koha-devel-bounces at lists.koha-community.org] Namens Marcel de Rooy Verzonden: donderdag 17 februari 2011 15:25 Aan: koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org Onderwerp: [Koha-devel] zebra / Heading-Main Hi, Some time ago Heading-Main was introduced in both authorities and biblios record.abs in marc_defs/marc21 and marc_defs/unimarc. Apparently, it was added to extend authority search with the option to search only in 100a, 110a, .. fields. But Heading-Main is not listed in one the attsets (bib1,..) This gives the warning: zebraidx(18056) [warn] Index 'Heading-Main' not found in attset(s) This bug was reported March 2009 (!) under: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3072 Related reports are: 3052, 3386 and 3429. We still have the following temporary fix in AuthoritiesMarc.pm : ##If mainentry search $a tag if (@$tags[$i] eq "mainmainentry") { # FIXME: 'Heading-Main' index not yet defined in zebra # $attr =" \@attr 1=Heading-Main "; $attr =" \@attr 1=Heading "; Would anyone of you object against defining a new 8XXX field in authorities bib1.att to activate Heading-Main and at the same time fixing AuthoritiesMarc.pm ? We now have there: att 8001 Heading att 8002 See-from att 8003 See-also-from att 8804 Match-heading att 8805 Match-subdivision att 8806 Subdivision att 8807 Subdivision-see-also-from att 8808 Subdivision-see-from att 8809 Match-heading-see-from att 8810 Match-subdivision-see-from BTW, an interesting way of incrementing from 8001 to 8810? We could add 8004 for Heading-Main ? Better idea? Regards, Marcel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gmcharlt at gmail.com Thu Feb 17 15:45:26 2011 From: gmcharlt at gmail.com (Galen Charlton) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:45:26 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] KohaCon 2011 : The Votes Are In In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Nicole Engard wrote: > The raw results will be posted to the wiki (I can't upload a CSV file > - I need some admin help). I do want to know what your opinions are > about posting the full CSV file to the wiki - it does have all our > email addresses. ?I might remove that column before posting if enough > people express a concern about that or just email the CSV to those who > want to see the raw results and not worry about posting it publicly at > all. An anonymized CSV file with the survey responses can now be found at http://wiki.koha-community.org/w/images/Kohacon2011-site-survey-results-anonymized.csv This file includes the site preferences and the voter's institutional affiliation but does not include the voter's name or email address. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton gmcharlt at gmail.com From ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Thu Feb 17 16:55:05 2011 From: ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com (Ian Walls) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:55:05 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] FW: zebra / Heading-Main In-Reply-To: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA311E0262@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> References: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA311E0262@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> Message-ID: I'd be happy to stop getting those warning messages in my inbox... so if what you propose will accomplish that, I'm game for testing. -Ian 2011/2/17 Marcel de Rooy > Only in authorities.. > > > > *Van:* koha-devel-bounces at lists.koha-community.org [mailto: > koha-devel-bounces at lists.koha-community.org] *Namens *Marcel de Rooy > *Verzonden:* donderdag 17 februari 2011 15:25 > *Aan:* koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > *Onderwerp:* [Koha-devel] zebra / Heading-Main > > > > Hi, > > > > Some time ago Heading-Main was introduced in both authorities and biblios > record.abs in marc_defs/marc21 and marc_defs/unimarc. > > Apparently, it was added to extend authority search with the option to > search only in 100a, 110a, .. fields. > > But Heading-Main is not listed in one the attsets (bib1,..) > > > > This gives the warning: zebraidx(18056) [warn] Index 'Heading-Main' not > found in attset(s) > > > > This bug was reported March 2009 (!) under: > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3072 > > Related reports are: 3052, 3386 and 3429. > > We still have the following temporary fix in AuthoritiesMarc.pm : > > ##If mainentry search $a tag > > if (@$tags[$i] eq "mainmainentry") { > > > > # FIXME: 'Heading-Main' index not yet defined in zebra > > # $attr =" \@attr 1=Heading-Main "; > > $attr =" \@attr 1=Heading "; > > > > > > Would anyone of you object against defining a new 8XXX field in authorities > bib1.att to activate Heading-Main and at the same time fixing > AuthoritiesMarc.pm ? > > We now have there: > > > > att 8001 Heading > > att 8002 See-from > > att 8003 See-also-from > > att 8804 Match-heading > > att 8805 Match-subdivision > > att 8806 Subdivision > > att 8807 Subdivision-see-also-from > > att 8808 Subdivision-see-from > > att 8809 Match-heading-see-from > > att 8810 Match-subdivision-see-from > > > > BTW, an interesting way of incrementing from 8001 to 8810? We could add > 8004 for Heading-Main ? Better idea? > > > > Regards, > > > > Marcel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Ian Walls Lead Development Specialist ByWater Solutions Phone # (888) 900-8944 http://bywatersolutions.com ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Twitter: @sekjal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tomascohen at gmail.com Thu Feb 17 17:08:43 2011 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:08:43 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] FW: zebra / Heading-Main In-Reply-To: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA311E0262@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> References: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA311E0262@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> Message-ID: 2011/2/17 Marcel de Rooy : > Only in authorities.. +1 From oleonard at myacpl.org Thu Feb 17 18:51:55 2011 From: oleonard at myacpl.org (Owen Leonard) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:51:55 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking opinions on Koha's calendar widget Message-ID: I would like to propose that we stop using the calendar widget which is currently included with Koha and start using the jQuery UI version at the same time that we incorporate jQuery UI into other areas of Koha (see bug 5481 - Replace YUI JS libraries with Jquery UI http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5481). Some reasons: - It's simpler to manage a single group of jQuery UI widgets than to continue to maintain a separate set of files just for the calendar. - jQueryUI is actively developed and packaged with Debian - Our current calendar widget is not longer being developed under GPL. The author asks $80 per domain for the current version. - The current calendar widget uses now-deprecated CSS properties which are causing problems in some browsers. The jQueryUI calendar widget can be tested here: http://jqueryui.com/demos/datepicker/ The configuration which most closely approaches the version we use is this one: http://jqueryui.com/demos/datepicker/#dropdown-month-year Note that when we implement jQuery UI we will be creating a "theme" for all jQuery UI widgets which will be consistent with Koha's colors. In other words, it doesn't have to be orange :) Can anyone suggest any reasons why we should not switch? -- Owen -- Web Developer Athens County Public Libraries http://www.myacpl.org From ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Thu Feb 17 18:55:40 2011 From: ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com (Ian Walls) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:55:40 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking opinions on Koha's calendar widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Owen, I can't see any compelling reason not to make the switch. Thanks for laying it out clearly for us! -Ian On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Owen Leonard wrote: > I would like to propose that we stop using the calendar widget which > is currently included with Koha and start using the jQuery UI version > at the same time that we incorporate jQuery UI into other areas of > Koha (see bug 5481 - Replace YUI JS libraries with Jquery UI > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5481). > > Some reasons: > > - It's simpler to manage a single group of jQuery UI widgets than to > continue to maintain a separate set of files just for the calendar. > - jQueryUI is actively developed and packaged with Debian > - Our current calendar widget is not longer being developed under GPL. > The author asks $80 per domain for the current version. > - The current calendar widget uses now-deprecated CSS properties which > are causing problems in some browsers. > > The jQueryUI calendar widget can be tested here: > > http://jqueryui.com/demos/datepicker/ > > The configuration which most closely approaches the version we use is this > one: > > http://jqueryui.com/demos/datepicker/#dropdown-month-year > > Note that when we implement jQuery UI we will be creating a "theme" > for all jQuery UI widgets which will be consistent with Koha's colors. > In other words, it doesn't have to be orange :) > > Can anyone suggest any reasons why we should not switch? > > -- Owen > > -- > Web Developer > Athens County Public Libraries > http://www.myacpl.org > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Ian Walls Lead Development Specialist ByWater Solutions Phone # (888) 900-8944 http://bywatersolutions.com ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Twitter: @sekjal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gmcharlt at gmail.com Thu Feb 17 19:21:44 2011 From: gmcharlt at gmail.com (Galen Charlton) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:21:44 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking opinions on Koha's calendar widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Owen Leonard wrote: > Can anyone suggest any reasons why we should not switch? For the calendar widget qua date-picker, switching to the jQuery UI widget makes sense for the reasons you've mentioned. I do have a question -- have you checked whether it can be made to work as a stand-alone calendar widget that is not tied to a form's input field, e.g., the way the current calendar widget is used on the holidays page? Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton gmcharlt at gmail.com From reedwade at gmail.com Thu Feb 17 20:38:16 2011 From: reedwade at gmail.com (Reed Wade) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:38:16 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking opinions on Koha's calendar widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Galen Charlton wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Owen Leonard wrote: >> Can anyone suggest any reasons why we should not switch? > > For the calendar widget qua date-picker, switching to the jQuery UI > widget makes sense for the reasons you've mentioned. ?I do have a > question -- have you checked whether it can be made to work as a > stand-alone calendar widget that is not tied to a form's input field, > e.g., the way the current calendar widget is used on the holidays > page? I'd like to add my voice to the 'yes, definitely you want to switch'. I've had a large project going that is eventually migrating from exactly that old stinky calendar widget to the jQuery UI calendar widget -- much more please to use from the user and developer ends. The only issue we've had is the old stinky widget support time and date setting so needed to handle time inputs separately. Galen, it can be used inline and I suspect would work how you're thinking. See: http://jqueryui.com/demos/datepicker/#inline -reed From gmcharlt at gmail.com Thu Feb 17 20:55:37 2011 From: gmcharlt at gmail.com (Galen Charlton) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:55:37 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking opinions on Koha's calendar widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Reed Wade wrote: > Galen, it can be used inline and I suspect would work how you're thinking. See: > ?http://jqueryui.com/demos/datepicker/#inline Thanks for confirming. +1 to the switch. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton gmcharlt at gmail.com From reedwade at gmail.com Thu Feb 17 21:02:10 2011 From: reedwade at gmail.com (Reed Wade) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:02:10 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking opinions on Koha's calendar widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Further--- It's well worth considering a whole hog shift to the jQuery UI widgets throughout. -reed On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Reed Wade wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Galen Charlton wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Owen Leonard wrote: >>> Can anyone suggest any reasons why we should not switch? >> >> For the calendar widget qua date-picker, switching to the jQuery UI >> widget makes sense for the reasons you've mentioned. ?I do have a >> question -- have you checked whether it can be made to work as a >> stand-alone calendar widget that is not tied to a form's input field, >> e.g., the way the current calendar widget is used on the holidays >> page? > > > I'd like to add my voice to the 'yes, definitely you want to switch'. > > I've had a large project going that is eventually migrating from > exactly that old stinky calendar widget to the jQuery UI calendar > widget -- much more please to use from the user and developer ends. > > The only issue we've had is the old stinky widget support time and > date setting so needed to handle time inputs separately. > > Galen, it can be used inline and I suspect would work how you're thinking. See: > ?http://jqueryui.com/demos/datepicker/#inline > > -reed > From henridamien.laurent at gmail.com Thu Feb 17 22:04:50 2011 From: henridamien.laurent at gmail.com (LAURENT Henri-Damien) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:04:50 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking opinions on Koha's calendar widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D5D8D72.60609@gmail.com> Le 17/02/2011 20:55, Galen Charlton a ?crit : > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Reed Wade wrote: >> Galen, it can be used inline and I suspect would work how you're thinking. See: >> http://jqueryui.com/demos/datepicker/#inline > > Thanks for confirming. > > +1 to the switch. > > Regards, > > Galen I have seen #localize... +1 for the switch. (and as far as I am concerned, everything that comes to unification and simplification of the tools used, you can count on me) -- Henri-Damien LAURENT From colin.campbell at ptfs-europe.com Thu Feb 17 22:18:23 2011 From: colin.campbell at ptfs-europe.com (Colin Campbell) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 21:18:23 +0000 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking opinions on Koha's calendar widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D5D909F.3030707@ptfs-europe.com> On 17/02/11 17:51, Owen Leonard wrote: > I would like to propose that we stop using the calendar widget which > is currently included with Koha and start using the jQuery UI version > at the same time that we incorporate jQuery UI into other areas of > Koha (see bug 5481 - Replace YUI JS libraries with Jquery UI > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5481). Definitely concur +1 Colin -- Colin Campbell Chief Software Engineer, PTFS Europe Limited Content Management and Library Solutions +44 (0) 845 557 5634 (phone) +44 (0) 7759 633626 (mobile) colin.campbell at ptfs-europe.com skype: colin_campbell2 http://www.ptfs-europe.com From mao at lins.fju.edu.tw Fri Feb 18 05:32:13 2011 From: mao at lins.fju.edu.tw (=?UTF-8?B?5q+b5oW256aO?=) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:32:13 +0800 Subject: [Koha-devel] KohaCon 2011 : The Votes Are In In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Congratulations to the organizers of the Thane. What happen if we remove those who vote for himself? A lot of vote come from the organizers themselves. http://wiki.koha-community.org/w/images/Kohacon2011-site-survey-results-anonymized.csv 2011/2/17 Galen Charlton : > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Nicole Engard wrote: > >> The raw results will be posted to the wiki (I can't upload a CSV file >> - I need some admin help). I do want to know what your opinions are >> about posting the full CSV file to the wiki - it does have all our >> email addresses. ?I might remove that column before posting if enough >> people express a concern about that or just email the CSV to those who >> want to see the raw results and not worry about posting it publicly at >> all. > > An anonymized CSV file with the survey responses can now be found at > > http://wiki.koha-community.org/w/images/Kohacon2011-site-survey-results-anonymized.csv > > This file includes the site preferences and the voter's institutional > affiliation but does not include the voter's name or email address. > > Regards, > > Galen > -- > Galen Charlton > gmcharlt at gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -- Wishing you all the best. . . . Anthony Mao ??? http://bit.ly/maolins Department of Library and Information Science Fu Jen Catholic University ?http://bit.ly/lins 510 Jhongjheng Rd., Sinjhuang City, Taipei County 24205, Taiwan From fridolyn.somers at gmail.com Fri Feb 18 07:23:23 2011 From: fridolyn.somers at gmail.com (Fridolyn SOMERS) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:23:23 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] FW: zebra / Heading-Main In-Reply-To: References: <809BE39CD64BFD4EB9036172EBCCFA311E0262@S-MAIL-1B.rijksmuseum.intra> Message-ID: By the way, why isn't the query for authorities searching in CCL ? I would be more clear and use named-indexes. Regards, On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Tomas Cohen Arazi wrote: > 2011/2/17 Marcel de Rooy : > > Only in authorities.. > > +1 > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Fridolyn SOMERS ICT engineer PROGILONE - Lyon - France fridolyn.somers at gmail.com -------------- section suivante -------------- Une pi?ce jointe HTML a ?t? nettoy?e... URL: From chris at bigballofwax.co.nz Fri Feb 18 08:51:20 2011 From: chris at bigballofwax.co.nz (Chris Cormack) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:51:20 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] KohaCon 2011 : The Votes Are In In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 18 February 2011 17:32, ??? wrote: > Congratulations to the organizers of the Thane. > What happen if we remove those who vote for himself? > > A lot of vote come from the organizers themselves. > http://wiki.koha-community.org/w/images/Kohacon2011-site-survey-results-anonymized.csv > For a purely academic exercise, lets say we decided to discard those votes (NOTE Im not saying we should do that. this is just for an exercise) That leaves 209 first place votes for Thane = 836 points Next closest is Nepal with 107 = 428 Then with 32 second place votes for nepal = 96 = 524 93 third place votes = 186 = 710 24 fourth place votes = 734 So throwing out all the votes for Thane from VPM Thane, and not counting any of the 2nd, 3rd and forth place votes for it, it still wins. Chris From cnighswonger at foundations.edu Fri Feb 18 13:36:55 2011 From: cnighswonger at foundations.edu (Chris Nighswonger) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:36:55 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking opinions on Koha's calendar widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Galen Charlton wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Reed Wade wrote: > > Galen, it can be used inline and I suspect would work how you're > thinking. See: > > http://jqueryui.com/demos/datepicker/#inline > > Thanks for confirming. > > +1 to the switch. > > Trying again.... ;-) +1 to switch as well. Kind Regards, Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paul.poulain at biblibre.com Fri Feb 18 13:59:34 2011 From: paul.poulain at biblibre.com (Paul Poulain) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:59:34 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Seeking opinions on Koha's calendar widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D5E6D36.3090703@biblibre.com> Le 17/02/2011 18:51, Owen Leonard a ?crit : > The jQueryUI calendar widget can be tested here: > > http://jqueryui.com/demos/datepicker/ +1 ;-) -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 From tomascohen at gmail.com Fri Feb 18 19:26:30 2011 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:26:30 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Add authorities add/del/mod logging Message-ID: Hi, I'm planning to add logging to the authorities management. In the 'action_logs' table we have, for biblios: module : CATALOGUING action : ADD/DELETE/MODIFY for biblios, and other actions for issuing, object : a biblionumber or itemnumber info : string: 'biblio' or 'item' or previous 'marc' field (when MODIFYing) My first thought was that we could use 'CATALOGUING' too, and that instead of 'biblio' in the info field we could use 'authority'. Something like module : CATALOGUING action : ADD/DELETE/MODIFY object : a authid info : string: 'authority' or previous 'marc' field (when MODIFYing) But I realized that it is impossible to differentiate, from tools/viewlog.pl point of view, if we're talking about a biblionumber or an itemnumber (and now an authid) when the operation is MODIFY. Check this from Items.pm: logaction("CATALOGUING", "MODIFY", $itemnumber, $new_item_marc->as_formatted) if C4::Context->preference("CataloguingLog"); In the results in fact, they are all shown as biblios (bug?)! So, adding 'authid' to the mix will make it worse. Should I add AUTHCAT module? Should we split CATALOGUING module into BIBLIOCAT and ITEMCAT? Also: should we avoid logging when calling ModItem from Issues::AddIssue? It looks too much overhead as there is a call to $new_item_marc->as_formatted. Have a nice weekend! To+ From kmkale at anantcorp.com Sat Feb 19 04:27:27 2011 From: kmkale at anantcorp.com (Koustubha Kale) Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 08:57:27 +0530 Subject: [Koha-devel] [Koha] KohaCon 2011 : The Votes Are In In-Reply-To: References: <20110218112701.0CB194F733@nail.towers.org.uk> Message-ID: Hi All, I am just back from a Koha training trip in Konkan. And this is great news to come back to. :) Thanks to all who voted for VPM, Thane, India. And also special thanks to Nicole for conducting the vote. I will start preparations and discussions immediately as soon as I reach office. Looking forward to participation, help and advise from all the Koha community in making KohaCon11 a success.. Regards, Koustubha Kale Anant Corporation Contact Details : Address? : 103, Armaan Residency, R. W Sawant Road, Nr. Golden Dyes Naka, Thane (w), ? ? ? ? ??? ? ? Maharashtra, India, Pin : 400601. TeleFax? : +91-22-21720108, +91-22-21720109 Mobile? ?? : +919820715876 Website? : http://www.anantcorp.com Blog : http://www.anantcorp.com/blog/?author=2 On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Nicole Engard wrote: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:27 AM, MJ Ray wrote: >> So... how can we win next time? ?In particular, should we bid with >> Weston-super-Mare or Edinburgh and are there any other pointers or >> tips that people would like to pass on, on-list or privately? > > MJ, I think it was pure numbers! ?With India off the table next year > (based on talks on #koha) I think we're gonna see a European location > next year :) I liked your location choice - all I wanted was for it to > be in the spring instead of the fall (but that's just me). > > Nicole > _______________________________________________ > Koha mailing list ?http://koha-community.org > Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz > http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha > From jransom at library.org.nz Mon Feb 21 03:53:29 2011 From: jransom at library.org.nz (Joann Ransom) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:53:29 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Who are the various Koha vendors in the USA? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: ByWater have an excellent reputation in the States - check out Marshall Breeding's Perception guide: http://www.librarytechnology.org/perceptions2010.pl I wouldn't go near PTFS if you are looking for open source Koha. Cheers Jo. 2011/2/21 Buster > And which one do you use, if any? > > > I know about LibLime and Bay Water. Anybody else? > > --JimMaroon > > -- > > ================================================== > "The man, who, by his own and his family's labour, can provide a > sufficiency of food and raiment and a comfortable dwelling place, is not a > poor man." --William Cobbett, *Cottage Economy*, 1826. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org > Koha at lists.katipo.co.nz > http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha > > -- Joann Ransom RLIANZA Head of Libraries, Horowhenua Library Trust. *Q: Why is this email three sentences or less? A: http://three.sentenc.es* -- Joann Ransom RLIANZA Head of Libraries, Horowhenua Library Trust. *Q: Why is this email three sentences or less? A: http://three.sentenc.es* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kmkale at anantcorp.com Mon Feb 21 08:01:13 2011 From: kmkale at anantcorp.com (Koustubha Kale) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:31:13 +0530 Subject: [Koha-devel] KohaCon2011 Message-ID: Hi All, To get the ball rolling, I have put up a page in Koha wiki at http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/KohaCon2011 I have also put up a supporting site at http://kohacon11.vpmthane.org/ Its just a stub yet but I will be working on it. Looking for ideas, volunteers, suggestions, comments..... Regards, Koustubha Kale Anant Corporation Contact Details : Address? : 103, Armaan Residency, R. W Sawant Road, Nr. Golden Dyes Naka, Thane (w), ? ? ? ? ??? ? ? Maharashtra, India, Pin : 400601. TeleFax? : +91-22-21720108, +91-22-21720109 Mobile? ?? : +919820715876 Website? : http://www.anantcorp.com Blog : http://www.anantcorp.com/blog/?author=2 From irmalibraries at gmail.com Mon Feb 21 09:26:55 2011 From: irmalibraries at gmail.com (Irma Birchall) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 19:26:55 +1100 Subject: [Koha-devel] KohaCon2011 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D6221CF.9050400@gmail.com> Hi Koustubha, Thank you for starting the ball rolling and creating the KohaCon2011 wiki page. Is this the correct address of the campus where the conference might be hosted? Location: Vidya Prasarak Mandal Chendani Bunder Road, Thane (West) - 400601 http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/KohaCon2011#KohaCon_2011_:_VPM.2C_Thane.2C_India Best wishes. Irma CALYX On 21/02/11 18:01, Koustubha Kale wrote: > Hi All, > To get the ball rolling, I have put up a page in Koha wiki at > http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/KohaCon2011 > > I have also put up a supporting site at http://kohacon11.vpmthane.org/ > Its just a stub yet but I will be working on it. > > Looking for ideas, volunteers, suggestions, comments..... > > Regards, > Koustubha Kale > Anant Corporation > > Contact Details : > Address : 103, Armaan Residency, R. W Sawant Road, Nr. Golden Dyes > Naka, Thane (w), > Maharashtra, India, Pin : 400601. > TeleFax : +91-22-21720108, +91-22-21720109 > Mobile : +919820715876 > Website : http://www.anantcorp.com > Blog : http://www.anantcorp.com/blog/?author=2 > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ From Cole.Hudson at hc.msu.edu Mon Feb 21 14:05:58 2011 From: Cole.Hudson at hc.msu.edu (Cole Hudson) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 08:05:58 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Editing the Comments feature on Koha Message-ID: <89A35FEF98F9384BBB1360526A846BC7041D87B7@TEAM-EXCHANGE1.hc.msu.edu> *Note: my apologies to all who have already seen this post on the koha general list-serv* Hi all, I'm running Koha 3.02 on Ubuntu 10.10. I'm trying to edit the comments feature that displays with each record in the opac. I'd like to edit it where the name of the patron is not pulled from each patron record-so as to make comments anonymous. Could someone point me in the right direction here on what code to edit/remove? Thanks. Cole Hudson Library Assistant MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Macomb University Center -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From henridamien.laurent at gmail.com Mon Feb 21 15:36:08 2011 From: henridamien.laurent at gmail.com (LAURENT Henri-Damien) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:36:08 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Solr and Z3950 server some news. In-Reply-To: <35132216e858a2e00a6b966fa9552380.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> References: <4D510CE4.70409@biblibre.com> <4ef2c1d826b8ef42ff870d0fba44be54.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> <4D54EFE5.2070403@biblibre.com> <02ac1f4ee319671a732cc1440d28be21.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> <4D550BB2.1090801@gmail.com> <35132216e858a2e00a6b966fa9552380.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> Message-ID: <4D627858.7060105@gmail.com> Hi Just some more interesting news. Le 11/02/2011 20:01, Thomas Dukleth a ?crit : > When briefly testing the BibLibre test configuration of SimpleServer > Z39.50 server I have found same problem as BibLibre are reporting when > using yaz-client. I have also noted some other issues. > > 1. BAD MARC ERROR. > > When setting format to UNIMARC in yaz-client, the following error message > is returned along with the record when displaying a record with the show > command. > > "[]Record type: Unimarc > > bad MARC. Dumping as it is:" > > When setting format to XML in yaz-client, no error message is returned > when displaying a record with the show command. > > "[]Record type: XML" > > The issue seems to be consistent for all records in the result set. > > YAZ is converting between ISO 2709 and MARCXML on the client side. > > yaz-client does not report a "bad MARC" error when displaying UNIMARC > MARCXML records returned from Zebra in ISO 2709 form. > > Whatever the MARC error may be, it prevents YAZ from parsing the records > properly in ISO 2709. Consequently, unlike yaz-client, my very well > tested PHP YAZ based Z39.50 client obtains the result set but cannot even > attempt to display the records because it relies upon YAZ for parsing > them. This issue is still worked upon... Work in progress. I hope we can find a solution this week. We are diving into the SimpleServer code + yaz source code to find a way to get this right. > 2. INVARIANT RESULT SET. > > In the configuration which I tested, any query would return exactly the > same 1011 record result set whether or not there would be any legitimate > matches. This has been fixed. This was owed to the fact that the RegExp::Grammars installed was too old. > > > 3. MISSING EXPLAIN RECORD. > > Lack of an Explain record should not be fatal but might be helpful for > obtaining more debugging information from YAZ. I have added a call to a minimal zebra configuration file. And should be fixed now. > > > 4. DEBUGGING. > > I do not have time to try intensive tests myself. > > First, fix the issue where the result set is an invariant 1011 records. > > I suggest having yaz-client save the ISO 2709 records, then attempt to > validate them with MARC::Lint keeping in mind that most errors would be > from the MARC 21 checks in MARC::Lint. > > I have not verified that MARCXML is working with SimpleServer using > Solr/Lucene but I would be happy to test that if some SimpleServer target > would be configured to return only MARCXML. > > If all else fails, Index Data can help solve the problems for a very > significant fee. Hope that helps. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT From nengard at gmail.com Mon Feb 21 22:47:25 2011 From: nengard at gmail.com (Nicole Engard) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Call for Articles: February Newsletter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I have gotten only one article so far - please send along your news - no matter how small. Nicole On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Nicole Engard wrote: > Hi all, > > It's that time again - please get me your newsletter articles by the > 23rd (your time zone) of February so that I can include them in the > newsletter. > > Thanks a bunch, > Nicole C. Engard > From chris.nighswonger at gmail.com Tue Feb 22 04:24:16 2011 From: chris.nighswonger at gmail.com (Christopher Nighswonger) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:24:16 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha 3.2.4 is now available Message-ID: It is with pleasure that I announce the release of Koha 3.2.4. The package can be retrieved from: http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.04.tar.gz You can use the following checksum and signature files to verify the download: http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.04.tar.gz.MD5 http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.04.tar.gz.MD5.asc http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.04.tar.gz.sig Release notes for 3.2.3 are below the fold. Come and get it! RELEASE NOTES FOR KOHA 3.2.4 - 22 February 2011 ======================================================================== Koha is the first free and open source software library automation package (ILS). Development is sponsored by libraries of varying types and sizes, volunteers, and support companies from around the world. The website for the Koha project is http://koha-community.org/ Koha 3.2.4 can be downloaded from: http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.04.tar.gz Installation instructions can be found at: http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Installation_Documentation Koha 3.2.4 is a bugfix/maintenance release. Highlights of 3.2.4 ====================== Some of the higher profile bugs addressed in this release are: 2341 items marked 'On Order' (notforloan == -1) don't interact correctly with opac-reserve.tmpl 4263 repeatable subfields in items 5376 Batch Edit and Delete need Superlibrarian Permissions 5683 link_bibs_to_authorities.pl can corrupt records 5477 Test cases requiring database access fail 5681 Autobarcode using C4::Barcode has issues with leading zeros and large values 5731 If an item doesn't have a collection code set, moredetail.pl will error This release also contains a variety of minor enhancements improving Koha's interface and underlying scripts as well as updates to several translations. Bugs fixed in 3.2.4 ====================== 2742 Wrong language name in the preferences 3009 Change items.content field so it prints due date by default 3212 MARC21 leader plugins should force Leader/09 to 'a' 3319 Need a nicer error message when attempting to add a patron with no libraries defined 4160 Currency Conversion dosn't handle rates other than 100 5115 Tags JavaScript includes many untranslatable strings 5140 In Chrome, drop-down menus disappear after using pop-up calendar 5230 MARC export by call number range results in a zero byte file 5661 Authority search return an "Error 500" when "Sort by" is set to "No order" 5673 Incorrect Test of guarantorid 5689 System preference notifications are not translatable 5690 items.timestamp was not being updated when an item was edited 5691 If someone deletes all items, with independent branches on, it deletes all 5699 Don't ignore subfield 3 when building a new record (UNIMARC specfic) 5700 Statuses not being set properly 5718 Moveitem has the wrong permissions 5735 Expanding/collapsing cloned fields in editor takes original field 5736 Fixing some zebra configuration errors in marc21/biblios/record.abs 5741 Extra comma causes JavaScript error in Internet Explorer 5745 overdues with fines not showing titles 5777 System preferences Tab content title and Save button partially translatable 4306 Label manage batch listing should show item-level itemtype 5452 Overdue date color in borrower's today issues 5616 UTF-8 problem in Card View 5629 Adding anchor to holdings link in opac-detail.pl tabs 5665 Routing slip prints too wide for narrow printers 5702 Opac - Results : Highlight link need IF condition 5726 Fix a bug in the selection of biblios to merge 5727 Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string 5734 Fix column order in issue history 5751 Removing refetences to unused members quicksearch code/template 5759 When printing a borrowers information the secondary email address is not printed 5769 notice tab disappearing on edit patron 5776 menu on funds wraps when only 1 fund 5649 Change wording on review.tmpl from white/blacklists to approved/rejected 5654 misc/installer_devel_notes not needed 5716 Whitespace correction for browse shelf link 4931 Stocktaking must be based on holdingbranch instead of homebranch 5506 Translation Process Simplification 5532 "Saved" message for sysprefs editor should show names of saved prefs 5733 Empty cart in intranet when session is closed 5760 Add the jquery table sorter to borrowers reading record System requirements ====================== Changes since 3.0: * The minimum version of Perl required is now 5.8.8. * There are a number of new Perl module dependencies. Run ./koha_perl_deps.pl -u -m to get a list of any new modules to install during upgrade. Upgrades ====================== The structure of the acquisitions tables have changed significantly from 3.0.x. In particular, the budget hierarchy is quite different. During an upgrade, a new database table is created called fundmapping that contains a record of how budgets were mapped. It is strongly recommended that users of Koha 3.0.x acquisitions carefully review the results of the upgrade before resuming ordering in Koha 3.2.x. Documentation ====================== As of Koha 3.2, the Koha manual is now maintained in DocBook. The home page for Koha documentation is http://koha-community.org/documentation/ As of the date of these release notes, several translations of the Koha manual are available: English: http://koha-community.org/documentation/3-2-manual/ Spanish: http://koha-community.org/documentation/3-2-manual-es/ French: http://koha-community.org/documentation/3-2-manual-fr/ The Git repository for the Koha manual can be found at http://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=kohadocs.git;a=summary Translations ====================== Complete or near-complete translations of the OPAC and staff interface are available in this release for the following languages: * Chinese * Danish * English (New Zealand) * English (USA) * French (France) * French (Canada) * German * Greek * Hindi * Italian * Norwegian * Portuguese * Spanish * Turkish Partial translations are available for various other languages. The Koha team welcomes additional translations; please see http://www.kohadocs.org/usersguide/apb.html for information about translating Koha, and join the koha-translate list to volunteer: http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-translate The most up-to-date translations can be found at: http://translate.koha-community.org/ Release Team ====================== The release team for Koha 3.2 is Release Manager: Galen Charlton Documentation Manager: Nicole Engard Translation Manager: Chris Cormack Release Maintainer (3.0.x): Henri-Damien Laurent Release Maintainer (3.2.x): Chris Nighswonger Credits ====================== We thank the following individuals who contributed patches to Koha 3.2.4: D Ruth Bavousett Jared Camins-Esakov Colin Campbell Fr?d?rick Capovilla Jerome Charaoui Galen Charlton Chris Cormack Fr?d?ric Demians Magnus Enger Katrin Fischer Henri-Damien LAURENT Owen Leonard Chris Nighswonger Liz Rea Marcel de Rooy Paul Poulain Brice Sanchez David Schuster Robin Sheat Reed Wade Ian Walls We regret any omissions. If a contributor has been inadvertantly missed, please send patch against these release notes to koha-patches at lists.koha-community.org. The 3.2.x Release Maintainer especially thanks the 3.4 Release Team and all who participated in QA for their diligent labors in testing and pushing well over 330 patches since the 3.2.0 relese. Their continued work very much makes possible the release of 3.2.4 on its announced schedule. Revision control notes ====================== The Koha project uses Git for version control. The current development version of Koha can be retrieved by checking out the master branch of git://git.koha-community.org/koha.git The branch for Koha 3.2.x (i.e., this version of Koha and future bugfix releases) is 3.2.x. The next major feature release of Koha will be Koha 3.4.0. Bugs and feature requests ====================== Bug reports and feature requests can be filed at the Koha bug tracker at http://bugs.koha-community.org/ Naku te rourou, nau te rourou, ka ora ai te iwi. From kmkale at anantcorp.com Tue Feb 22 04:45:43 2011 From: kmkale at anantcorp.com (Koustubha Kale) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:15:43 +0530 Subject: [Koha-devel] KohaCon2011 In-Reply-To: <4D6221CF.9050400@gmail.com> References: <4D6221CF.9050400@gmail.com> Message-ID: Yes it is. Here is the link to the campus on Google maps http://www.google.co.in/mapmaker?gw=39&fid=0x3be7b927cd6912b9:0xcd4b44329d5ed6bb Planning to add lots of info on the wiki asap.. Regards, Koustubha Kale Anant Corporation Contact Details : Address? : 103, Armaan Residency, R. W Sawant Road, Nr. Golden Dyes Naka, Thane (w), ? ? ? ? ??? ? ? Maharashtra, India, Pin : 400601. TeleFax? : +91-22-21720108, +91-22-21720109 Mobile? ?? : +919820715876 Website? : http://www.anantcorp.com Blog : http://www.anantcorp.com/blog/?author=2 On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Irma Birchall wrote: > Hi Koustubha, > > Thank you for starting the ball rolling and creating the KohaCon2011 wiki > page. > > Is this the correct address of the campus where the conference might be > hosted? > > Location: Vidya Prasarak Mandal Chendani Bunder Road, Thane (West) - 400601 > > http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/KohaCon2011#KohaCon_2011_:_VPM.2C_Thane.2C_India > > Best wishes. > Irma > CALYX > > > > > On 21/02/11 18:01, Koustubha Kale wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> To get the ball rolling, I have put up a page in Koha wiki at >> http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/KohaCon2011 >> >> I have also put up a supporting site at http://kohacon11.vpmthane.org/ >> Its just a stub yet but I will be working on it. >> >> Looking for ideas, volunteers, suggestions, comments..... >> >> Regards, >> Koustubha Kale >> Anant Corporation >> >> Contact Details : >> Address ?: 103, Armaan Residency, R. W Sawant Road, Nr. Golden Dyes >> Naka, Thane (w), >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Maharashtra, India, Pin : 400601. >> TeleFax ?: +91-22-21720108, +91-22-21720109 >> Mobile ? ? : +919820715876 >> Website ?: http://www.anantcorp.com >> Blog : http://www.anantcorp.com/blog/?author=2 >> _______________________________________________ >> Koha-devel mailing list >> Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org >> http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >> website : http://www.koha-community.org/ >> git : http://git.koha-community.org/ >> bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > > From cybermon at gmail.com Tue Feb 22 09:54:03 2011 From: cybermon at gmail.com (Cybermon) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:54:03 +0800 Subject: [Koha-devel] koha cataloging Message-ID: Dear All, I would like to ask about few questions for koha configuration. I was successfully installed the koha used following address. http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Koha_3.2_on_Debian_Squeeze. But my opac address not working only show the apache the default web page /it works/, which configuration is missing for me. I would like to add *084/other classification/* field for Koha cataloging, what should i do ? Best regards, Gana -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mjr at phonecoop.coop Tue Feb 22 10:24:08 2011 From: mjr at phonecoop.coop (MJ Ray) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:24:08 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Koha-devel] koha cataloging In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20110222092408.3EACAF7EEF@nail.towers.org.uk> Cybermon wrote: > I would like to ask about few questions for koha configuration. I was > successfully installed the koha used following address. > http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Koha_3.2_on_Debian_Squeeze. But my opac > address not working only show the apache the default web page /it works/, > which configuration is missing for me. > > I would like to add *084/other classification/* field for Koha cataloging, > what should i do ? These are not development questions. They would be better asked in the general discussion area, not koha-devel. Quick answers: 1. you probably have a default virtual host taking priority over your koha virtual host. "a2dissite default" may be a quick fix, but reading the /usr/share/doc/apache2-common files and http://httpd.apache.org/docs/ will explain why that happened. It's a problem with apache httpd setup, not with koha setup. 2. you edit the framework(s) to add that field if it's not present or not as you want. Hope that helps, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. Past Koha Release Manager (2.0), LMS programmer, statistician, webmaster. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire for Koha work http://www.software.coop/products/koha From paul.poulain at biblibre.com Tue Feb 22 12:04:32 2011 From: paul.poulain at biblibre.com (Paul Poulain) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:04:32 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] bugzilla workflow, question when "pushed, pls test" rejected Message-ID: <4D639840.4070507@biblibre.com> Hello, On http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3495, chris has pushed a patch, it's now "patch pushed" "please test". I tested and have found a problem (see comment 3) Should I modify the patch status ? which value to set to have the RM seing there's something more to do ? What i know for sure is that it can't stay "patch pushed", as there's a problem ;-) -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 From cnighswonger at foundations.edu Tue Feb 22 12:46:53 2011 From: cnighswonger at foundations.edu (Chris Nighswonger) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:46:53 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] bugzilla workflow, question when "pushed, pls test" rejected In-Reply-To: <4D639840.4070507@biblibre.com> References: <4D639840.4070507@biblibre.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Paul Poulain wrote: > Hello, > > On http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3495, chris > has pushed a patch, it's now "patch pushed" "please test". > I tested and have found a problem (see comment 3) > Should I modify the patch status ? which value to set to have the RM > seing there's something more to do ? > > What i know for sure is that it can't stay "patch pushed", as there's a > problem ;-) > Chris can correct me if I'm wrong.... Once the patch has been pushed to a QA branch it is "Pushed for QA." If it fails QA it should be "Failed QA." If it passes it should be "Needs sign off" or "Signed off." Once pushed to master it is "Patch Pushed." If at any time it fails a test the status should return to "Failed QA." At least that's how I read it. Kind Regards, Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paul.poulain at biblibre.com Tue Feb 22 12:59:22 2011 From: paul.poulain at biblibre.com (Paul Poulain) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:59:22 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] bugzilla workflow, question when "pushed, pls test" rejected In-Reply-To: References: <4D639840.4070507@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <4D63A51A.5070303@biblibre.com> Le 22/02/2011 12:46, Chris Nighswonger a ?crit : > Chris can correct me if I'm wrong.... > > Once the patch has been pushed to a QA branch it is "Pushed for QA." > > If it fails QA it should be "Failed QA." > > If it passes it should be "Needs sign off" or "Signed off." > > Once pushed to master it is "Patch Pushed." > > If at any time it fails a test the status should return to "Failed QA." That's how I read it too, but when "patch pushed", there's something in master and something that is wrong. So it should not just be "failed QA" because in this status a patch can be hidden in a middle of many other "failed QA" that have no consequences in master. the more I think of it the more I suspect it would be a good idea to have a new status. -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 From fridolyn.somers at gmail.com Tue Feb 22 13:33:00 2011 From: fridolyn.somers at gmail.com (Fridolyn SOMERS) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:33:00 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Editing the Comments feature on Koha In-Reply-To: <89A35FEF98F9384BBB1360526A846BC7041D87B7@TEAM-EXCHANGE1.hc.msu.edu> References: <89A35FEF98F9384BBB1360526A846BC7041D87B7@TEAM-EXCHANGE1.hc.msu.edu> Message-ID: Hie, In file "opac-details.tmpl", line 692 :
Comment by
This part shows the name of the user who made the comment. Just erase what you don't want to see. Regards, 2011/2/21 Cole Hudson > *Note: my apologies to all who have already seen this post on the koha > general list-serv* > > > > Hi all, > > > > I?m running Koha 3.02 on Ubuntu 10.10. I?m trying to edit the comments > feature that displays with each record in the opac. I?d like to edit it > where the name of the patron is not pulled from each patron record?so as to > make comments anonymous. Could someone point me in the right direction here > on what code to edit/remove? Thanks. > > > > Cole Hudson > > Library Assistant > > MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine > > Macomb University Center > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Fridolyn SOMERS ICT engineer PROGILONE - Lyon - France fridolyn.somers at gmail.com -------------- section suivante -------------- Une pi?ce jointe HTML a ?t? nettoy?e... URL: From cnighswonger at foundations.edu Tue Feb 22 13:42:37 2011 From: cnighswonger at foundations.edu (Chris Nighswonger) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 07:42:37 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] bugzilla workflow, question when "pushed, pls test" rejected In-Reply-To: <4D63A51A.5070303@biblibre.com> References: <4D639840.4070507@biblibre.com> <4D63A51A.5070303@biblibre.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Paul Poulain wrote: > Le 22/02/2011 12:46, Chris Nighswonger a ?crit : > > Chris can correct me if I'm wrong.... > > > > Once the patch has been pushed to a QA branch it is "Pushed for QA." > > > > If it fails QA it should be "Failed QA." > > > > If it passes it should be "Needs sign off" or "Signed off." > > > > Once pushed to master it is "Patch Pushed." > > > > If at any time it fails a test the status should return to "Failed QA." > That's how I read it too, but when "patch pushed", there's something in > master and something that is wrong. So it should not just be "failed QA" > because in this status a patch can be hidden in a middle of many other > "failed QA" that have no consequences in master. > > the more I think of it the more I suspect it would be a good idea to > have a new status. > > I understand what you are thinking now. I think if we just followed the use of the status and resolution fields (see http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/page.cgi?id=fields.html#status) then in the case you suggest we would just re-open the bug. I wonder if we are not creating solutions for a problem which is really due to a lack of utilizing solutions which already exist? Kind Regards, Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paul.poulain at biblibre.com Tue Feb 22 13:58:31 2011 From: paul.poulain at biblibre.com (Paul Poulain) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:58:31 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] bugzilla workflow, question when "pushed, pls test" rejected In-Reply-To: References: <4D639840.4070507@biblibre.com> <4D63A51A.5070303@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <4D63B2F7.8030300@biblibre.com> Le 22/02/2011 13:42, Chris Nighswonger a ?crit : > I understand what you are thinking now. > > I think if we just followed the use of the status and resolution > fields (see > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/page.cgi?id=fields.html#status) > then in the case you suggest we would just re-open the bug. > > I wonder if we are not creating solutions for a problem which is > really due to a lack of utilizing solutions which already exist? I don't think so: the status (not patch status) is "assigned, so the bug is not considered as "resolved". chris is just waiting for feedback to confirm it can be closed (I'm doing that on all bugs where biblibre.com is reporter or assigned or cc: atm, already closed something like 20 !). Sometimes the bug can't be closed because the applied solution has a problem (other examples : 3550, 3816, 3924, 4044). Staying "assigned" and "patch pushed" is incomplete: OK, a patch has been pushed, but i've detected a problem on it ! let's chris waking up and we will see (he may have more important things to do those days if he has family or friends on christchurch :\ ) -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 From tomascohen at gmail.com Tue Feb 22 14:22:40 2011 From: tomascohen at gmail.com (Tomas Cohen Arazi) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:22:40 -0300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Bug 5791 - Robust handling of deleted biblios/authorities Message-ID: I've filled a bug for better non existent record handling for biblios and authorities. I propose to use the same approach used for patrons. I hope I can submit a patch within a few hours. For authorities I plan to add to authorities/detail.pl a check like this: if ( defined $authtypecode ) { record show stuff } else { generate proper error message } To+ From Cole.Hudson at hc.msu.edu Tue Feb 22 14:38:04 2011 From: Cole.Hudson at hc.msu.edu (Cole Hudson) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Editing the Comments feature on Koha In-Reply-To: References: <89A35FEF98F9384BBB1360526A846BC7041D87B7@TEAM-EXCHANGE1.hc.msu.edu> Message-ID: <89A35FEF98F9384BBB1360526A846BC7041D8A4D@TEAM-EXCHANGE1.hc.msu.edu> Splendid! Works like a charm! Thanks so much. Cole From: Fridolyn SOMERS [mailto:fridolyn.somers at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 7:33 AM To: Cole Hudson Cc: koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] Editing the Comments feature on Koha Hie, In file "opac-details.tmpl", line 692 :
Comment by
This part shows the name of the user who made the comment. Just erase what you don't want to see. Regards, 2011/2/21 Cole Hudson *Note: my apologies to all who have already seen this post on the koha general list-serv* Hi all, I'm running Koha 3.02 on Ubuntu 10.10. I'm trying to edit the comments feature that displays with each record in the opac. I'd like to edit it where the name of the patron is not pulled from each patron record-so as to make comments anonymous. Could someone point me in the right direction here on what code to edit/remove? Thanks. Cole Hudson Library Assistant MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Macomb University Center _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -- Fridolyn SOMERS ICT engineer PROGILONE - Lyon - France fridolyn.somers at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From colin.campbell at ptfs-europe.com Tue Feb 22 15:04:59 2011 From: colin.campbell at ptfs-europe.com (Colin Campbell) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:04:59 +0000 Subject: [Koha-devel] Bug 5791 - Robust handling of deleted biblios/authorities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D63C28B.8080407@ptfs-europe.com> On 22/02/11 13:22, Tomas Cohen Arazi wrote: > I've filled a bug for better non existent record handling for biblios > and authorities. I propose to use the same approach used for patrons. > I hope I can submit a patch within a few hours. > > For authorities I plan to add to authorities/detail.pl a check like this: > > if ( defined $authtypecode ) { > record show stuff > } else { > generate proper error message > } I'm assuming GetAuthority and GetBiblio are returning undef as the returned $record so you should be able to test if ($record) Catching these errors will be a major improvement, thanks Colin -- Colin Campbell Chief Software Engineer, PTFS Europe Limited Content Management and Library Solutions +44 (0) 845 557 5634 (phone) +44 (0) 7759 633626 (mobile) colin.campbell at ptfs-europe.com skype: colin_campbell2 http://www.ptfs-europe.com From semarie-koha at latrappe.fr Tue Feb 22 17:38:31 2011 From: semarie-koha at latrappe.fr (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E8re_S=E9bastien?= Marie) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:38:31 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Imported MARC notice and Authorities: : inconsistent database In-Reply-To: <20110215105330.GB20709@latrappe.fr> References: <20110215105330.GB20709@latrappe.fr> Message-ID: <20110222163831.GH27171@latrappe.fr> Hi, I ask review for my (start of) solution, against inconsitent between authority (auth_header.auth_id) and koha_internal_code (like 700$9). The restoration of the consistent should be in 2 stages: - stop inconsistent growing - relinks authorities This is for the first stage: stop inconsistent growing... (as we continue to catalog using some external marc files) Currently, 'cataloguing/addbiblio.pl' not check authorities if field like 700$9 exists (see BiblioAddAuthorities function). If a subfield '3' or '9' exists in field 500, 600,..., 700... there is not search for authority and the function assume the koha_internal_number is right (I think this behaviour is wrong). So, I want to strip this subfield: if no subfield, BiblioAddAuthorities will search for authority and create it if not found. Here a piece of code (the most part is taken from 'BiblioAddAuthorities') : sub BiblioCleanKohaInternalCode { my ( $record, $frameworkcode ) = @_; my $dbh=C4::Context->dbh; my $query=$dbh->prepare(qq| SELECT authtypecode,tagfield FROM marc_subfield_structure WHERE frameworkcode=? AND (authtypecode IS NOT NULL AND authtypecode<>\"\")|); $query->execute($frameworkcode ? $frameworkcode : ''); while (my $data=$query->fetchrow_hashref){ foreach my $field ($record->field($data->{tagfield})){ #?clean code 3 and 9 (if exists) $field->delete_subfield(code => ['3', '9']); } } } and I call it just after 'MARCfindbreeding', in order to sanitize the record just getted. It seems to function well: the page show record without xxx$9, and at the creation of the notice, authorities are search, found or created, and linked. But what do you think: is it safe or not, to strip '3' and '9' code in these fields ? Thanks. -- Fr?re S?bastien Marie Abbaye Notre Dame de La Trappe 61380 Soligny-la-Trappe T?l: 02.33.84.17.00 Fax: 02.33.34.98.57 Web: http://www.latrappe.fr/ From kmkale at anantcorp.com Wed Feb 23 04:43:09 2011 From: kmkale at anantcorp.com (Koustubha Kale) Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:13:09 +0530 Subject: [Koha-devel] Trial install of "OPEN CONFERENCE SYSTEMS" Message-ID: Hi All, I have set up a trial install of "OPEN CONFERENCE SYSTEMS" ( http://pkp.sfu.ca/ocs/) at http://kohacon11.vpmthane.org/ocs/ Please have a look and let me have your thoughts on its usefulness for organizing Kohacon. I can provide "Conference Director" access on request.. Regards, Koustubha Kale Anant Corporation Contact Details : Address : 103, Armaan Residency, R. W Sawant Road, Nr. Golden Dyes Naka, Thane (w), Maharashtra, India, Pin : 400601. TeleFax : +91-22-21720108, +91-22-21720109 Mobile : +919820715876 Website : http://www.anantcorp.com Blog : http://www.anantcorp.com/blog/?author=2 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jcamins at cpbibliography.com Wed Feb 23 20:56:46 2011 From: jcamins at cpbibliography.com (Jared Camins-Esakov) Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Subject tracings Message-ID: Hello. Can anyone think of any reason not to specify that subject tracings should match only complete subfields? For example, at the moment, if you are looking at a book about Religions (with a subject term "Religions") in the catalog of a library that does not use Koha's authority control, when you click on the subject tracing in the OPAC, you will be given a result set that contains every single record that has the word "Religions" anywhere in its subject. Including, for example, books with the subject "Christianity and other religions." If we make the query on the subject tracings su,complete-subfield: the only false positives will be items where the subject heading being searched is used for both a main entry and a subdivision, which still seems like a significant improvement over the current behavior. Thoughts? Regards, Jared -- Jared Camins-Esakov Freelance bibliographer, C & P Bibliography Services, LLC (phone) +1 (917) 727-3445 (e-mail) jcamins at cpbibliography.com (web) http://www.cpbibliography.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Thu Feb 24 04:29:05 2011 From: ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com (Ian Walls) Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Separating MARC Framework Structure from Display Message-ID: Colleagues and Friends, I've been doing a training for a library in Maine, and working with their cataloguers has got me thinking a lot about the MARC Frameworks. Right now, our Frameworks are doing two jobs: defining what MARC means, and determining how that information will display in the editor and MARC views. It seems to me that we may benefit from separating these two functions more thoroughly. Doing so would allow us to have one or two framework structures per MARC flavour, but as many displays as we like. I'm thinking of the further future of Koha where we support more than just MARC (like native DC, MOD, METS or EAD data), and having the semantics and display separated is more critical (so we can provide a common display layer to all those formats) To that end, I'd recommend some changes to how the display information is handled in the GUI. First off, having 'basic' constraints and 'advanced' constraints (hidden by JQuery) should be eliminated in favour of a semantic section and a display section. Secondly, the 'hidden' value should no longer be an integer (at least in the GUI), but a dropdown, or series of dropdowns, laying out in plain text under what conditions you're hiding the value. Does this make sense to others, or am I writing too late into the evening? Cheers, -Ian -- Ian Walls Lead Development Specialist ByWater Solutions Phone # (888) 900-8944 http://bywatersolutions.com ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Twitter: @sekjal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fridolyn.somers at gmail.com Thu Feb 24 08:30:48 2011 From: fridolyn.somers at gmail.com (Fridolyn SOMERS) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 08:30:48 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Subject tracings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hie, I agry. And add that this should also be in relevance (when weighted query) : exact match subjects must be above others. Regards, 2011/2/23 Jared Camins-Esakov > Hello. > > Can anyone think of any reason not to specify that subject tracings should > match only complete subfields? For example, at the moment, if you are > looking at a book about Religions (with a subject term "Religions") in the > catalog of a library that does not use Koha's authority control, when you > click on the subject tracing in the OPAC, you will be given a result set > that contains every single record that has the word "Religions" anywhere in > its subject. Including, for example, books with the subject "Christianity > and other religions." > > If we make the query on the subject tracings su,complete-subfield: the only > false positives will be items where the subject heading being searched is > used for both a main entry and a subdivision, which still seems like a > significant improvement over the current behavior. Thoughts? > > Regards, > Jared > > -- > Jared Camins-Esakov > Freelance bibliographer, C & P Bibliography Services, LLC > (phone) +1 (917) 727-3445 > (e-mail) jcamins at cpbibliography.com > (web) http://www.cpbibliography.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Fridolyn SOMERS ICT engineer PROGILONE - Lyon - France fridolyn.somers at gmail.com -------------- section suivante -------------- Une pi?ce jointe HTML a ?t? nettoy?e... URL: From henridamien.laurent at gmail.com Thu Feb 24 11:18:05 2011 From: henridamien.laurent at gmail.com (LAURENT Henri-Damien) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:18:05 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Subject tracings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D66305D.1070404@gmail.com> Le 23/02/2011 20:56, Jared Camins-Esakov a ?crit : > Hello. > > Can anyone think of any reason not to specify that subject tracings > should match only complete subfields? Hi, I agree too. Note that completeness is not always enabled by default on the zebra configuration. With our default configuration, it would be available for :p indexes only. Hope that helps. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT > For example, at the moment, if you > are looking at a book about Religions (with a subject term "Religions") > in the catalog of a library that does not use Koha's authority control, > when you click on the subject tracing in the OPAC, you will be given a > result set that contains every single record that has the word > "Religions" anywhere in its subject. Including, for example, books with > the subject "Christianity and other religions." > > If we make the query on the subject tracings su,complete-subfield: the > only false positives will be items where the subject heading being > searched is used for both a main entry and a subdivision, which still > seems like a significant improvement over the current behavior. Thoughts? > > Regards, > Jared > > -- > Jared Camins-Esakov > Freelance bibliographer, C & P Bibliography Services, LLC > (phone) +1 (917) 727-3445 > (e-mail) jcamins at cpbibliography.com > (web) http://www.cpbibliography.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ From nengard at gmail.com Thu Feb 24 13:13:21 2011 From: nengard at gmail.com (Nicole Engard) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:13:21 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Separating MARC Framework Structure from Display In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2011/2/23 Ian Walls > > To that end, I'd recommend some changes to how the display information is > handled in the GUI. First off, having 'basic' constraints and 'advanced' > constraints (hidden by JQuery) should be eliminated in favour of a semantic > section and a display section. Secondly, the 'hidden' value should no > longer be an integer (at least in the GUI), but a dropdown, or series of > dropdowns, laying out in plain text under what conditions you're hiding the > value. > I've had this conversation with Ian many times and I usually throw in that I'd go a step further and say that cataloging shouldn't be dependent on Frameworks at all! We should have the option to use a Framework if we want one, but for us professional catalogers we want freedom to add and remove fields as we see fit - while cataloging - not before we start cataloging. I'd like to see a blank cataloging form that I can tab through and add fields and subfields as needed. If I'm understanding right, the first step in this process would be to make the changes Ian is suggesting and then we can move forward from there. > > Does this make sense to others, or am I writing too late into the evening? > > Makes sense to me - but like I said I've heard it all before :) Thanks Nicole -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nengard at gmail.com Thu Feb 24 13:17:52 2011 From: nengard at gmail.com (Nicole Engard) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:17:52 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Subject tracings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2011/2/23 Jared Camins-Esakov > Hello. > > Can anyone think of any reason not to specify that subject tracings should > match only complete subfields? For example, at the moment, if you are > looking at a book about Religions (with a subject term "Religions") in the > catalog of a library that does not use Koha's authority control, when you > click on the subject tracing in the OPAC, you will be given a result set > that contains every single record that has the word "Religions" anywhere in > its subject. Including, for example, books with the subject "Christianity > and other religions." > I was doing a training a few months ago and the librarians there loved the fact that it didn't do an exact match. The reasoning made sense to me (but then again I was never a stickler for the rules when I was cataloging). If you have a book with about the United States and a book that takes place in the United States the subject term "United States" will appear in different spots (with other possible identifiers). The way it searches now allows you to find all of those subjects. Other examples include keywords like 'Juvenile' or 'Fiction' (just to name a few). I like that the search chains the subjects together as keyword searches (on the subject) because then you get more than if you were limited only to that exact subject. Further, if your library isn't using Authorities then it makes perfect sense that the search be flexible as it is now because there is no telling how two people cataloged two books on the same topics. > > If we make the query on the subject tracings su,complete-subfield: the only > false positives will be items where the subject heading being searched is > used for both a main entry and a subdivision, which still seems like a > significant improvement over the current behavior. Thoughts? > This might need to be an authorities system preference that asks outright if the library uses authority control - and if so then you can make the search only search the full authority - otherwise I'd say it should stay the way it is. Thanks Nicole -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Thu Feb 24 13:21:56 2011 From: ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com (Ian Walls) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:21:56 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Subject tracings In-Reply-To: <4D66305D.1070404@gmail.com> References: <4D66305D.1070404@gmail.com> Message-ID: When doing an initial search, I'd recommend we stay with the current set up (more results is better, as they can be narrowed with the filters), but if you're clicking the subject tracing on a specific record (or on one of the filters), yes, I think it should be forced to completeness. You want precisely _that thing_. You're seeking, rather than searching. We could also apply this to names and series entries in a similar fashion. My understanding is that this completeness is on a subfield-level only; so clicking the tracing for "Religion -- Europe" would generate the search "su,complete-subfield:Religion AND su,complete-subfield:Europe", still retrieving more records (like those with two headings, "Religion" and "Christianity -- Europe -- 19th Century") Is my understanding correct? -Ian On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:18 AM, LAURENT Henri-Damien < henridamien.laurent at gmail.com> wrote: > Le 23/02/2011 20:56, Jared Camins-Esakov a ?crit : > > Hello. > > > > Can anyone think of any reason not to specify that subject tracings > > should match only complete subfields? > Hi, > I agree too. > Note that completeness is not always enabled by default on the zebra > configuration. > With our default configuration, it would be available for :p indexes only. > Hope that helps. > -- > Henri-Damien LAURENT > > > > For example, at the moment, if you > > are looking at a book about Religions (with a subject term "Religions") > > in the catalog of a library that does not use Koha's authority control, > > when you click on the subject tracing in the OPAC, you will be given a > > result set that contains every single record that has the word > > "Religions" anywhere in its subject. Including, for example, books with > > the subject "Christianity and other religions." > > > > If we make the query on the subject tracings su,complete-subfield: the > > only false positives will be items where the subject heading being > > searched is used for both a main entry and a subdivision, which still > > seems like a significant improvement over the current behavior. Thoughts? > > > > Regards, > > Jared > > > > -- > > Jared Camins-Esakov > > Freelance bibliographer, C & P Bibliography Services, LLC > > (phone) +1 (917) 727-3445 > > (e-mail) jcamins at cpbibliography.com > > (web) http://www.cpbibliography.com/ > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Koha-devel mailing list > > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Ian Walls Lead Development Specialist ByWater Solutions Phone # (888) 900-8944 http://bywatersolutions.com ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Twitter: @sekjal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From paul.poulain at biblibre.com Thu Feb 24 13:39:49 2011 From: paul.poulain at biblibre.com (Paul Poulain) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:39:49 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Subject tracings In-Reply-To: References: <4D66305D.1070404@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4D665195.8010403@biblibre.com> Le 24/02/2011 13:21, Ian Walls a ?crit : > When doing an initial search, I'd recommend we stay with the current > set up (more results is better, as they can be narrowed with the > filters), but if you're clicking the subject tracing on a specific > record (or on one of the filters), yes, I think it should be forced to > completeness. You want precisely _that thing_. You're seeking, > rather than searching. > > We could also apply this to names and series entries in a similar fashion. We have made a development for Nimes public library that is related to this too. You can see the result here : http://cat-bib.nimes.fr/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=84738 click on an author or a subject. A popup is spawn, letting the user specify better how he want to jump. -- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 From nengard at gmail.com Thu Feb 24 13:53:31 2011 From: nengard at gmail.com (Nicole Engard) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:53:31 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Subject tracings In-Reply-To: <4D665195.8010403@biblibre.com> References: <4D66305D.1070404@gmail.com> <4D665195.8010403@biblibre.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Paul Poulain wrote: > We have made a development for Nimes public library that is related to > this too. > > You can see the result here : > http://cat-bib.nimes.fr/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=84738 > click on an author or a subject. A popup is spawn, letting the user > specify better how he want to jump. > While that is cool, I'd argue that it's too complicated for your average library user. If we went that way it should be a system preference so that it's not the only way to do a subject search. > > -- > Paul POULAIN > http://www.biblibre.com > Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc > Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From lculber at mdah.state.ms.us Thu Feb 24 14:35:36 2011 From: lculber at mdah.state.ms.us (Linda Culberson) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:35:36 -0600 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha Separating MARC Framework Structure from Display In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4D665EA8.2090203@mdah.state.ms.us> I very much agree with Nicole on this one. One of my problems with the frameworks in our institutions is that while it is true that visual materials, books, serials, and manuscripts can use different frameworks, it would be very helpful to be able to add/remove fields and subfields as needed while cataloging. On 2/24/2011 6:13 AM, Nicole Engard wrote: > > 2011/2/23 Ian Walls > > > > To that end, I'd recommend some changes to how the display > information is handled in the GUI. ? First off, having 'basic' > constraints and 'advanced' constraints (hidden by JQuery) should be > eliminated in favour of a semantic section and a display section. > ? Secondly, the 'hidden' value should no longer be an integer (at > least in the GUI), but a dropdown, or series of dropdowns, laying > out in plain text under what conditions you're hiding the value. > > > I've had this conversation with Ian many times and I usually throw in > that I'd go a step further and say that cataloging shouldn't be > dependent on Frameworks at all!? We should have the option to use a > Framework if we want one, but for us professional catalogers we want > freedom to add and remove fields as we see fit - while cataloging - not > before we start cataloging.? I'd like to see a blank cataloging form > that I can tab through and add fields and subfields as needed.? If I'm > understanding right, the first step in this process would be to make the > changes Ian is suggesting and then we can move forward from there. > > > Does this make sense to others, or am I writing too late into the > evening? ? > > > Makes sense to me - but like I said I've heard it all before :) > > > Thanks > Nicole > > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ -- Linda Culberson lculber at mdah.state.ms.us Archives and Records Services Division Ms. Dept. of Archives & History P. O. Box 571 Jackson, MS 39205-0571 Telephone: 601/576-6873 Facsimile: 601/576-6824 From lculber at mdah.state.ms.us Thu Feb 24 14:45:50 2011 From: lculber at mdah.state.ms.us (Linda Culberson) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:45:50 -0600 Subject: [Koha-devel] Subject tracings In-Reply-To: <4D665195.8010403@biblibre.com> References: <4D66305D.1070404@gmail.com> <4D665195.8010403@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <4D66610E.2060003@mdah.state.ms.us> I like this development by BibLibre very much. We have a variety of patrons. Some are very serious researchers who know exactly what they want and don't appreciate the vagueness of the fuzzy-type searches. On the other hand, we have some people who are new to researching, aren't quite sure what they want, and they do want (or think they want) *everything* we have on "civil rights" or "Vicksburg" even if such a search gives a mind-numbing number of results. I think the "drill down" filters would be very helpful. On 2/24/2011 6:39 AM, Paul Poulain wrote: > Le 24/02/2011 13:21, Ian Walls a ??crit : >> When doing an initial search, I'd recommend we stay with the current >> set up (more results is better, as they can be narrowed with the >> filters), but if you're clicking the subject tracing on a specific >> record (or on one of the filters), yes, I think it should be forced to >> completeness. You want precisely _that thing_. You're seeking, >> rather than searching. >> >> We could also apply this to names and series entries in a similar fashion. > We have made a development for Nimes public library that is related to > this too. > > You can see the result here : > http://cat-bib.nimes.fr/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=84738 > click on an author or a subject. A popup is spawn, letting the user > specify better how he want to jump. > -- Linda Culberson lculber at mdah.state.ms.us Archives and Records Services Division Ms. Dept. of Archives & History P. O. Box 571 Jackson, MS 39205-0571 Telephone: 601/576-6873 Facsimile: 601/576-6824 From bargioni at pusc.it Thu Feb 24 14:59:11 2011 From: bargioni at pusc.it (Stefano Bargioni) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:59:11 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Separating MARC Framework Structure from Display In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: In my opinion, Koha has a very good UI for cataloguing. However, this proposal is interesting because -if I'm not wrong- framework personalization could be up to the cataloguer level. This will allow to rise productivity of cataloguers who know MARC rules very well. Stefano From ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Thu Feb 24 16:55:30 2011 From: ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com (Ian Walls) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:55:30 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Separating MARC Framework Structure from Display In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Right. This would let us keep the same underlying MARC structure for all the records coming in, but put different interfaces on it for different cataloguers. The advanced, well-trained cataloguer could see the full MARC specification, while a librarian or volunteer without cataloging training could see a simplified screen for entering the kinds of items they're responsible for. -Ian On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:59 AM, Stefano Bargioni wrote: > In my opinion, Koha has a very good UI for cataloguing. > However, this proposal is interesting because -if I'm not wrong- framework > personalization could be up to the cataloguer level. > This will allow to rise productivity of cataloguers who know MARC rules > very well. > Stefano > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Ian Walls Lead Development Specialist ByWater Solutions Phone # (888) 900-8944 http://bywatersolutions.com ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Twitter: @sekjal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From henridamien.laurent at biblibre.com Thu Feb 24 19:07:26 2011 From: henridamien.laurent at biblibre.com (LAURENT Henri-Damien) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:07:26 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] Script to remove authorities Message-ID: <4D669E5E.6050803@biblibre.com> Hi you will find here a command line script which allows deduping authorities based on the parameters passed. You can test and tell me what you think of that. I also fixed the merge script in C4::AuthoritiesMarc.pm http://git.biblibre.com/?p=koha;a=blob;f=C4/AuthoritiesMarc.pm;h=af99fa632ee886a636a83feea6f737f2069bf448;hb=refs/heads/master I think it is quite handy at the moment. It requires though that your authorities index are declared with completeness and p and you can declare on which index and which data you want to deduplicate $0 --match index/123sub##index2/123a####index2/001 AUTHTYPECODE1 AUTHTYPECODE2 Hope that helps. -- Henri-Damien LAURENT -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dedduping_authorities.pl Type: application/x-perl Size: 8457 bytes Desc: not available URL: From cnighswonger at foundations.edu Thu Feb 24 22:22:43 2011 From: cnighswonger at foundations.edu (Chris Nighswonger) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:22:43 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Koha 3.2.5 is now available Message-ID: Please note: This release is a security release. It is strongly recommended that users apply this upgrade immediately to production systems. If you are installing a new system, please use this version rather than earlier versions. It is with pleasure that I announce the release of Koha 3.2.5. The package can be retrieved from: http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.05.tar.gz You can use the following checksum and signature files to verify the download: http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.05.tar.gz.MD5 http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.05.tar.gz.MD5.asc http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.05.tar.gz.sig Release notes for 3.2.5 are below. Come and get it! RELEASE NOTES FOR KOHA 3.2.5 - 24 February 2011 ======================================================================== Koha is the first free and open source software library automation package (ILS). Development is sponsored by libraries of varying types and sizes, volunteers, and support companies from around the world. The website for the Koha project is http://koha-community.org/ Koha 3.2.5 can be downloaded from: http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.05.tar.gz Installation instructions can be found at: http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/Installation_Documentation Highlights of 3.2.5 ====================== NOTE: This release is a security release. It is strongly recommended that users apply this upgrade immediately to production systems. If you are installing a new system, please use this version rather than earlier versions. Bugs fixed in 3.2.5 ====================== 1953 remove possible SQL injection attacks 2742 Wrong language name in the preferences 5745 overdues with fines not showing titles 5759 When printing a borrowers information the secondary email address is not printed 5769 notice tab disappearing on edit patron System requirements ====================== Changes since 3.0: * The minimum version of Perl required is now 5.8.8. * There are a number of new Perl module dependencies. Run ./koha_perl_deps.pl -u -m to get a list of any new modules to install during upgrade. Upgrades ====================== The structure of the acquisitions tables have changed significantly from 3.0.x. In particular, the budget hierarchy is quite different. During an upgrade, a new database table is created called fundmapping that contains a record of how budgets were mapped. It is strongly recommended that users of Koha 3.0.x acquisitions carefully review the results of the upgrade before resuming ordering in Koha 3.2.x. Documentation ====================== As of Koha 3.2, the Koha manual is now maintained in DocBook. The home page for Koha documentation is http://koha-community.org/documentation/ As of the date of these release notes, several translations of the Koha manual are available: English: http://koha-community.org/documentation/3-2-manual/ Spanish: http://koha-community.org/documentation/3-2-manual-es/ French: http://koha-community.org/documentation/3-2-manual-fr/ The Git repository for the Koha manual can be found at http://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=kohadocs.git;a=summary Translations ====================== Complete or near-complete translations of the OPAC and staff interface are available in this release for the following languages: * Chinese * Danish * English (New Zealand) * English (USA) * French (France) * French (Canada) * German * Greek * Hindi * Italian * Norwegian * Portuguese * Spanish * Turkish Partial translations are available for various other languages. The Koha team welcomes additional translations; please see http://www.kohadocs.org/usersguide/apb.html for information about translating Koha, and join the koha-translate list to volunteer: http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-translate The most up-to-date translations can be found at: http://translate.koha-community.org/ Release Team ====================== The release team for Koha 3.2 is Release Manager: Galen Charlton Documentation Manager: Nicole Engard Translation Manager: Chris Cormack Release Maintainer (3.0.x): Henri-Damien Laurent Release Maintainer (3.2.x): Chris Nighswonger Credits ====================== We thank the following individuals who contributed patches to Koha 3.2.5: Owen Leonard Chris Nighswonger marcel at libdevelop.rijksmuseum.nl Paul Poulain We regret any omissions. If a contributor has been inadvertantly missed, please send patch against these release notes to koha-patches at lists.koha-community.org. The 3.2.x Release Maintainer especially thanks the 3.4 Release Team and all who participated in QA for their diligent labors in testing and pushing well over 330 patches since the 3.2.0 relese. Their continued work very much makes possible the release of 3.2.5 on its announced schedule. Revision control notes ====================== The Koha project uses Git for version control. The current development version of Koha can be retrieved by checking out the master branch of git://git.koha-community.org/koha.git The branch for Koha 3.2.x (i.e., this version of Koha and future bugfix releases) is 3.2.x. The next major feature release of Koha will be Koha 3.4.0. Bugs and feature requests ====================== Bug reports and feature requests can be filed at the Koha bug tracker at http://bugs.koha-community.org/ Naku te rourou, nau te rourou, ka ora ai te iwi. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robin at catalyst.net.nz Fri Feb 25 00:19:23 2011 From: robin at catalyst.net.nz (Robin Sheat) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:19:23 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Koha 3.2.5 is now available In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1298589563.2664.47.camel@zarathud> Chris Nighswonger schreef op do 24-02-2011 om 16:22 [-0500]: > Please note: This release is a security release. It is strongly > recommended > that users apply this upgrade immediately to production systems. If > you are > installing a new system, please use this version rather than earlier > versions. The stable packages have been updated to this just now, I'm about to make some new squeeze-dev ones too. -- Robin Sheat Catalyst IT Ltd. ? +64 4 803 2204 GPG: 5957 6D23 8B16 EFAB FEF8 7175 14D3 6485 A99C EB6D -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Fri Feb 25 00:31:28 2011 From: ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com (Ian Walls) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Script to remove authorities In-Reply-To: <4D669E5E.6050803@biblibre.com> References: <4D669E5E.6050803@biblibre.com> Message-ID: Sounds great, looking forward to testing it out. Will let you know what I find. -Ian 2011/2/24 LAURENT Henri-Damien > Hi > you will find here a command line script which allows deduping > authorities based on the parameters passed. > You can test and tell me what you think of that. > I also fixed the merge script in C4::AuthoritiesMarc.pm > > http://git.biblibre.com/?p=koha;a=blob;f=C4/AuthoritiesMarc.pm;h=af99fa632ee886a636a83feea6f737f2069bf448;hb=refs/heads/master > I think it is quite handy at the moment. > It requires though that your authorities index are declared with > completeness and p and you can declare on which index and which data you > want to deduplicate > > $0 --match index/123sub##index2/123a####index2/001 AUTHTYPECODE1 > AUTHTYPECODE2 > Hope that helps. > -- > Henri-Damien LAURENT > > > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel at lists.koha-community.org > http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel > website : http://www.koha-community.org/ > git : http://git.koha-community.org/ > bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/ > -- Ian Walls Lead Development Specialist ByWater Solutions Phone # (888) 900-8944 http://bywatersolutions.com ian.walls at bywatersolutions.com Twitter: @sekjal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From magnus at enger.priv.no Fri Feb 25 09:05:54 2011 From: magnus at enger.priv.no (Magnus Enger) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:05:54 +0100 Subject: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Koha 3.2.5 is now available In-Reply-To: References: <1298589563.2664.47.camel@zarathud> Message-ID: On 25 February 2011 09:00, wrote: >> Is it safe to just update from 3.2.3 with an existing database? >> >> If so, is that generally safe with point releases at that third level >> (3.2.6 through 2.2.9 but perhaps not 3.3?) >> >> Does everything just automagically work while the system is in use, or >> does Apache or something need to be restarted, or is there an >> upgrade-data script that needs to be run? > Sorry I didn't specifically state my questions are regarding updating > automatically via the Debian package management system, not the > traditional, more manual methods, whatever those might be. . . That would be this, from INSTALL.debian (http://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=blob_plain;f=INSTALL.debian;hb=HEAD): UPGRADE ======= If you are upgrading from a previous installation of Koha 3, you can use the following: ./koha_perl_deps.pl -u -m # to identify new Perl dependencies perl Makefile.PL --prev-install-log /path/to/koha-install-log make make test sudo make upgrade After you have done that you should immediately go to your Intranet and if there are required changes to the database you will be prompted to login and and the web installer will do the updates for you. The OPAC will display a "this system is under maintenance" type message until you have done that. I imagine that last bit would work much the same way with the packages, although I haven't had much time to play with them yet... Best regards, Magnus Enger libriotech.no From nengard at gmail.com Fri Feb 25 13:12:27 2011 From: nengard at gmail.com (Nicole Engard) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:12:27 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] Official Koha Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 2: February 2011 Message-ID: Please read the newsletter online for live links: http://koha-community.org/koha-newsletter-volume-2issue-2-february-2011/ Official Koha Newsletter (ISSN 2153-8328) Volume 2, Issue 2: February 2011 Table of Contents * Koha Developments o Koha 3.2.5 Available o RFC Roundup: System Administration * Koha in Libraries o South Taranaki District Libraries move to Koha o Koha Article: OSS in Italy o Koha in Mongolia o Koha in the Maldives * Koha Events o KohaCon 2011 in India Koha Developments Koha 3.2.5 Available by Chris Nighswonger Please note: This release is a security release. It is strongly recommended that users apply this upgrade immediately to production systems. If you are installing a new system, please use this version rather than earlier versions. The package can be retrieved from: http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.05.tar.gz You can use the following checksum and signature files to verify the download: http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.05.tar.gz.MD5 http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.05.tar.gz.MD5.asc http://download.koha-community.org/koha-3.02.05.tar.gz.sig Release notes for 3.2.5 can be found here. RFC Roundup: System Administration by MJ Ray This month, I?m looking at some Requests For Comments pages about Systems Administration improvement ideas. If you?ve any comments on any of these, please visit the wiki and just edit the pages to add your ideas or comment on the suggestions that are already there. Alternatively, you could start a discussion on the email list or web forum at http://koha-community.org/support/. * Enhance renewals parameters o This page says the suggestion is aimed at Koha 3.4, so time is running out for it. It?s currently the really short idea that ?Renewable ? should be part of smart-rules.pl and take more parameters into account: ability to renew X time for patron Category Y, for item type Z in Branch A?. Could you tidy this idea up, link it to a bug and get it ready for development? If so, please visit the wiki and help Koha develop. * Managing permissions on acquisition module o This is a more complete request, suggesting we follow a similar model for the acquisitions module as for the tools module, with much more granular permissions. It suggests splitting acquisition permissions into nine smaller permissions which would allow different users to be authorised to do different parts of the process. If you?d like to see the suggested split and maybe suggest groupings or others, go to visit the wiki. * Improving statistics on acquisitions RFC o Well, the other side of monitoring acquisitions is to collect statistics for reporting afterwards. This RFC was aimed at Koha 3.2, so either it needs marking as completed, or it needs updating for 3.4 or 3.6. * Support for Syndetics enhanced content RFC o I think this might already be in Koha 3.2 ? at least my Koha site has a Syndetics section in the Enhanced Content system preferences page. If you use Syndetics with Koha, could you update this page to say that it is completed and working, please? * Translation Process: Installer and Javascript libraries improvements o This RFC needs some work to make it clearer what users want from the developers when it comes to installing other languages, and probably linking to an enhancement bug. * Guided reports serials RFC o A plan to expand the guided reports concept to the serials table, sponsored by St Etienne University and developed by BibLibre, expected for/deadline: 2011-05-01 ? I think that will make it just miss Koha 3.4?s release, so there should still be time to comment on the wiki. Please Contribute! Please, if you have any feedback or encouragement for any of the above, follow the link and add comments, or start a discussion. It really does make a difference, helping Koha to develop in the best way possible, in collaboration between users and developers. Koha Libraries South Taranaki District Libraries move to Koha by Susan McMillan The South Taranaki District Council (STDC) Libraries are pleased to announce that they are changing to Koha in March. While initially skeptical that a ?free? system could provide for the needs of a modern public library (in South Taranaki?s case made up of seven branches), staff were pleasantly surprised with the features that Koha offers straight out of the box. After Council?s IT Manager, Pete Sayers and Customer Services Librarian, Cath Sheard, attended Koha10 conference last year the IT department decided to trial Koha. Soon Cath and I were getting emails and excited phone calls from IT telling us how they had set up a borrower, added a book (their cataloguing was abysmal!) and issued items to themselves ? all with no training or library knowledge what-so-ever. Cath and I soon had some MARC records imported, set up lending rules, Google book covers, carousels and personalised the OPAC. What we found tricky was the change in terminology between our current management system and that used in Koha. We are looking forward to going live with Koha after Taranaki Anniversary weekend on 14 March. Koha Article: OSS in Italy by Zeno Tajoli Abstract: Koha is an open-source Integrated Library System (ILS) developed in New Zealand and deployed for the first time in January of 2000 for Horowhenua Library Trust. Koha is a full-fledged software with basic and advanced features. Koha has also a strong and wide community of librarians and developers. In particular, it is suitable to all institutions who want to automate their libraries using a system that allows a complete control over data and over software itself. CILEA worked to adapt Koha to Italian libraries and now it is a part of the community. * The official link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650751111106555 * The post-print link: http://eprints.rclis.org/handle/10760/15340 Koha in Mongolia by J. Begzsuren Central Public Library of Ulaanbaatar in Mongolia has been working to implement Koha in our library since August, 2010. As of now we have successfully tested the conversion of our Softlink Alice ?ansi? database into a Koha ?unicode? database. Our partners are KOICA, volunteer He Shin Young, librarian and Mongolian Libraries Consortium Gantulga, IT specialist. This is the first library in Mongolia to implement Koha to a public library and the first known ansi database conversion. We are still working on conversion but our system will be live soon at http://koha.pl.ub.gov.mn. Koha in the Maldives by Aminath Riyaz Koha is making waves in the Maldives library sector. A few personnel from the Maldives library and information sector have been exposed to Koha briefly during the last few years, at the short term training programs hosted by the SAARC Documentation Center, New Delhi, India. Koha made a loud enough impact in the Maldives with the formation of DLNetSA (Digital Library Network of South Asia) in July 2010. This was followed by a ?training of trainers? workshop on Koha held in Male?, Maldives, organized by the Maldives Greenstone support Network and facilitated by resource persons from HealthNet Nepal. A trial database was hosted by HealthNet Nepal at http://115.187.27.13. With online support of HealthNet Nepal, Maldives Library Association (MLA) is introducing Koha to the libraries in the Maldives. As a first step, the MLA will be setting up Koha in four libraries selected strategically from different parts of the island nation. More information about this pilot project is available at http://infomalias.wordpress.com/2011/01/29/computerise-your-library. The interest shown by the library sector is overwhelming. This is not unexpected, as there are only a few libraries in the country with even an online library catalogue. The only library known to be using an integrated library system at present is the Maldives National University Library. The MLA is very enthusiastic about this endeavor and is very thankful for the support from HealthNet Nepal, University of Waikato, and the Maldives Greenstone support Network. This project is a huge step for MLA given the small group of Library and Information Science professionals in the country. Koha Events KohaCon 2011 in India by Nicole C. Engard The KohaCon 2011 Location Survey is closed. We had a total of 877 responses. If you voted for a location as your first choice it got 4 points, your second choice 3 points, and so on. Below is the break down in points. * Thane, India [ End October - Beginning November ] 2640+150+62+33= 2885 * Kathmandu, Nepal [ November / December 2011 ] 432+96+186+24= 738 * Kolkata, India [ November / December 2011 ] 156+339+104+33= 632 * Somerset or Bristol, UK [ September / October 2011 ] 160+141+72+108 = 481 A break down of results can be found here and raw results available upon request. Even if we ignore votes from those who didn?t fill in all the information I?m pretty sure we have a winner. In addition, I recommend that we soon move on to voting for the location for 2012 so that we can get on top of things and conference planners have more time to prepare. Newsletter edited by Nicole C. Engard, Koha Documentation Manager. Please send future story ideas to me. From cnighswonger at foundations.edu Fri Feb 25 20:31:38 2011 From: cnighswonger at foundations.edu (Chris Nighswonger) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:31:38 -0500 Subject: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Koha 3.2.5 is now available In-Reply-To: References: <1298589563.2664.47.camel@zarathud> Message-ID: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:42 AM, wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Magnus Enger > wrote: > >>> Is it safe to just update from 3.2.3 with an existing database? > >>> > >>> If so, is that generally safe with point releases at that third level > >>> (3.2.6 through 2.2.9 but perhaps not 3.3?) > >>> > >>> Does everything just automagically work while the system is in use, or > >>> does Apache or something need to be restarted, or is there an > >>> upgrade-data script that needs to be run? > > > >> Sorry I didn't specifically state my questions are regarding updating > >> automatically via the Debian package management system, not the > >> traditional, more manual methods, whatever those might be. . . > > > > That would be this, from INSTALL.debian > > ( > http://git.koha-community.org/gitweb/?p=koha.git;a=blob_plain;f=INSTALL.debian;hb=HEAD > ): > > Thanks much for replying Magnus. The link above returns "no such > project" for me, perhaps a permissions issue? > Works fine from my neck of the woods. Kind Regards, Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kohadevel at agogme.com Sun Feb 27 12:37:45 2011 From: kohadevel at agogme.com (Thomas Dukleth) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:37:45 -0000 (UCT) Subject: [Koha-devel] Script to remove authorities In-Reply-To: <4D669E5E.6050803@biblibre.com> References: <4D669E5E.6050803@biblibre.com> Message-ID: Reply inline: On Thu, February 24, 2011 18:07, LAURENT Henri-Damien wrote: > Hi > you will find here a command line script which allows deduping > authorities based on the parameters passed. > You can test and tell me what you think of that. > I also fixed the merge script in C4::AuthoritiesMarc.pm > http://git.biblibre.com/?p=koha;a=blob;f=C4/AuthoritiesMarc.pm;h=af99fa632ee886a636a83feea6f737f2069bf448;hb=refs/heads/master The link does not seem to point to a command line script. > I think it is quite handy at the moment. > It requires though that your authorities index are declared with > completeness and p and you can declare on which index and which data you > want to deduplicate > > $0 --match index/123sub##index2/123a####index2/001 AUTHTYPECODE1 > AUTHTYPECODE2 > Hope that helps. [...] Thomas Dukleth Agogme 109 E 9th Street, 3D New York, NY 10003 USA http://www.agogme.com +1 212-674-3783 From kohadevel at agogme.com Mon Feb 28 06:40:40 2011 From: kohadevel at agogme.com (Thomas Dukleth) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 05:40:40 -0000 (UCT) Subject: [Koha-devel] Script to remove authorities In-Reply-To: <4D6AB815.6080502@biblibre.com> References: <4D669E5E.6050803@biblibre.com> <4D6AB815.6080502@biblibre.com> Message-ID: <1bc3af80ced1be5cc5bdecb62d7ee4b3.squirrel@wmail.agogme.com> Sorry, I had not noticed that Henri-Damien Laurent had sent the the authorities deduplication script as an attachment. I have become unaccustomed to looking for attachments to email messages on mailing lists. Thomas Dukleth Agogme 109 E 9th Street, 3D New York, NY 10003 USA http://www.agogme.com +1 212-674-3783 From chris at bigballofwax.co.nz Mon Feb 28 18:10:11 2011 From: chris at bigballofwax.co.nz (Chris Cormack) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 06:10:11 +1300 Subject: [Koha-devel] Jenkins (formerly known as hudson, until Oracle lost their minds) hosting Message-ID: Hi All As you are probably all aware I have been running a hudson (now jenkins) instance on my linode server. It has been invaluable for catching errors and for helping to drive us towards better testing. The problem I now have is that my linode instance is RAM starved with both bugzilla and jenkins on it. So I am looking for volunteers to offer a machine to host jenkins on. Ideally debian (running squeeze) as the packages for jenkins work really well. I would need a login so I could set up and configure jenkins, and get it running all the tests again, but then id be happy to have sudo access revoked and let someone else maintain it. Jenkins is a pile of java, so it is RAM hungry. Conversely I could leave it running on my linode, but others could chip in to help afford the upgrade to the next level to get more ram available. Or any other suggestions? Chris PS the Jenkins story is an interesting one, and one worth reading about, a lot of how not to interact with a free software community lessons to be learnt there.