[Koha-devel] patches with DB change, workflow

[Chris Nighswonger]

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Paul Poulain <paul.poulain at biblibre.com> wrote:
> Le 23/05/2011 14:48, Chris Nighswonger a écrit :
>> So my vote is to use this method unless there is a very compelling
>> reason to do otherwise.
> What's happening with
>
> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6328 (see comment 20)

So should I assume that "does not apply cleanly" in this case is due
to the 'XXX' in the version number? If so, as I said, that is a 30 to
60 second fix. But without looking into it further, I'd guess that
there were other problems with this patch set which caused it not to
apply cleanly and that the DB version number was still only a less
than one minute fix with the "other problems" (unrelated to the DB
version number) being the real time consumer.

>
> is interesting. I think the idea of atomic updates is very interesting. And the workflow/wiki must be updated anyway !

I agree that the wiki needs to speak with one tongue regarding
whatever work flow is decided upon. :-)

Kind Regards,
Chris